Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1 Interrupted vaginal closure |
Procedure: Interrupted vaginal closure
Horizontal mattress closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh
|
Active Comparator: 2 Continuous vaginal closure |
Procedure: Continuous vaginal closure
Running closure of vaginal mucosa over mesh
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Mesh exposure [One year]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Pain [One year]
- Dyspareunia [One year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Danielle Patterson, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2007p002015