The Effect of Bilateral Erector Spina Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section Under SpinalAnaesthesia

Sponsor
Ankara University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05695625
Collaborator
Ahmet Onat Bermede (Other), Süheyla Karadağ Erkoç (Other), Volkan Baytaş (Other), Bulut Varlı (Other), Hanife Asuman Uysalel (Other)
116
1
2
21.1
5.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute pain after cesarean section (SC) can be variable. Untreated pain can affect patients' life quality. Currently regional nerve blocks are frequently used as a part of multimodal analgesia. Erector spina plane block (ESPB), a recently defined interfacial plane block, provides multisegmental analgesia by spreading to both ventral and dorsal branches of the spinal nerve roots in the cranio-caudal plane with a single injection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ESPB on postoperative pain, analgesic use and patient satisfaction in patients delivered by CS under spinal anesthesia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Spinal anesthesia + bilateral erector spine plane block
  • Other: Spinal anesthesia
N/A

Detailed Description

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the world. Acute pain intensity after cesarean section can be variable, making difficult to predict pain severity. Untreated pain can affect patients' life quality. Currently regional nerve blocks are frequently used as a part of multimodal analgesia. Erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a recently defined interfascial plane block. As a result of ultrasound (USG) guided local anesthetic drug injection into the fascial plane between erector spina muscle and vertebral transverse process, multisegmental analgesia provided by spreading to the both ventral and dorsal branches of the spinal nerve roots in cranio-caudal plane with a single injection. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of bilateral ESPB on postoperative pain, using the visual analog scale (VAS) in patients delivered by CS under spinal anesthesia. The secondary aims of the study are to evaluate the effects of ESPB on analgesic drug use and patient satisfaction in the postoperative period.

116 pregnants, aged between 18-45 years, delivered by CS from May 2020 to June 2021 included the prospective, randomised, single centre study. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, over 45 years, body mass index (BMI) over 35 kg/m2, ASA status over III, multiple pregnancy, preeclampsia, bleeding diathesis, opioid use and allergy to drugs to be used in the study. Spinal anesthesia was administered with 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl 12.5mcg at the level of L4-5 interspace with 26G quincke spinal needle in the sitting position. At the end of the surgery, in ESPB group, patients were given a sitting position with the help of 2 people for USG-guided ESPB. The high-frequency linear USG probe was placed in the midline at T12 level, after the spinous process visualized, the transverse process was visualized by moving probe 3-4cm laterally. After confirming the location of the needle tip with 1-2ml hydrodissection, 10 ml bupivacaine + 10 ml salin was applied both right and left sides. At the postoperative 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24th hours, patients' rest, cough, movement, low back and headache VAS values, analgesic drug use, first analgesic use time and satisfaction were evaluated. ESPB spread level was evaluated with pin-prick at the 4-6th hours. The SPSS 11.5 program was used for statistical analysis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
116 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
The Effect of Bilateral Erector Spina Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 6, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group ESPB

Spinal anesthesia + bilateral ESPB (total of 40 ml, %0.5 bupivacaine)

Other: Spinal anesthesia + bilateral erector spine plane block
Intraoperative period: Spinal anesthesia was administered with 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl 12.5mcg at the level of L4-5 interspace in the sitting position. At the end of the surgery, patients were given a sitting position with the help of 2 people for USG-guided ESPB. The high-frequency linear USG probe was placed in the midline at T12 level, after the spinous process visualized, the transverse process was visualized by moving probe 3-4cm laterally. After confirming the location of the needle tip with 1-2ml hydrodissection, 10 ml bupivacaine + 10 ml salin was applied both right and left sides. Postoperative period: If patients' VAS value >4, 75mg diclofenac intramuscular was administered. After 30 mins if patients' VAS values >4, 1000mg paracetamol intravenously was administered.

Active Comparator: Group SA

Only spinal anesthesia

Other: Spinal anesthesia
Intraoperative period: Spinal anesthesia was administered with 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl 12.5mcg at the level of L4-5 interspace in the sitting position. Postoperative period: If patients' VAS value >4, 75mg diclofenac intramuscular was administered. After 30 mins if patients' VAS values >4, 1000mg paracetamol intravenously was administered.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Postoperative pain [24 hours]

    VAS scores at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24th hours. (VAS is an 11 point numeric scale ranges from 0 to 10. )

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Postoperative analgesic drug consumption [24 hours]

    Diclofenac consumption in the first 24 hours was measured.

  2. Need for rescue analgesic [24 hours]

    The number of patients who required rescue analgesic in the first 24 hours and paracetamol consumption were recorded.

  3. Number of patients with postoperative nausea-vomiting and need of antiemetic usage [24 hours]

    Number of patients with postoperative nausea-vomiting and need of antiemetic usage were recorded.

  4. Patients' satisfaction [24 hours]

    At the postoperative 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24th hours patients' satisfaction was assessed using a descriptive verbal scale (11 point scale from 0 to 10. 0: not satisfied, 10: very satisfied).

  5. First analgesic using time, first mobilization time, hospitalization time [Postoperative 4 days on an average]

    Postoperative first analgesic using time, first mobilization time and hospitalization time were recorded.

  6. ESPB spread level [4-6th hours]

    The range of sensory block level in ESPB group was evaluated as dermatomal after the effect of spinal anesthesia passed, at 4-6th hours with pin-prick test.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • between 18-45 years, pregnants delivered by CS from May 2020 to June 2021
Exclusion Criteria:
  • age under 18 years, over 45 years, body mass index (BMI) over 35 kg/m2, ASA status over III, multiple pregnancy, preeclampsia, bleeding diathesis, opioid use and allergy to drugs to be used in the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Bengi Şafak Ankara Turkey 06230

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ankara University
  • Ahmet Onat Bermede
  • Süheyla Karadağ Erkoç
  • Volkan Baytaş
  • Bulut Varlı
  • Hanife Asuman Uysalel

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bengi Şafak, Ankara University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Bengi Safak, Principal Investigator, Ankara University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05695625
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AnkaraU-CS-ESPB
First Posted:
Jan 25, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jan 25, 2023
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Bengi Safak, Principal Investigator, Ankara University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 25, 2023