Pudendal Nerve Block for Post-Episiotomy Pain Relief
Sponsor
Ain Shams University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03944291
Collaborator
(none)
102
1
2
8.7
11.8
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block for Post-Episiotomy Pain Relief: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment
:
102 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
BupivacaineBupivacaine
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block for Post-Episiotomy Pain Relief: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date
:
May 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date
:
Jan 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date
:
Jan 20, 2020
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Unilateral PNB Unilateral Pudendal Nerve Block |
Procedure: Pudendal Nerve Block
Pudendal Nerve Block
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Bilateral PNB Bilateral Pudendal Nerve Block |
Procedure: Pudendal Nerve Block
Pudendal Nerve Block
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analogue Scale for pain scoring [48 hours]
visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 with 0 corresponding to no pain at all and 100 as the worst pain the woman can describe
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years
to 40 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
- Term (37 to 42 weeks gestation), primigravid women with singleton vertex fetus
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women with bleeding disorders, known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics, chronic use of pain medication, had previous vaginal surgery, extensive vulvovaginal infection, malposition or malpresentation were excluded from the study. Also, women who failed to deliver vaginally, had extensive perineal or cervicat tears, or had instrumental delivery were excluded from the final analysis of the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital | Cairo | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ain Shams University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.Responsible Party:
Mohamed S Sweed, MD,
Principal Investigator,
Ain Shams University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03944291
Other Study ID Numbers:
- AS1871
First Posted:
May 9, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jan 28, 2020
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2020
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms: