Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06100172
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
2
16
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study, entitled "Delivering Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation as an Adjunct Non-Opioid Pain Management Therapy for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery", is to demonstrate whether transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) can non-invasively reduce the perception of pain in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. tAN is placed on and around the ear to non-invasively stimulate branches of the vagus and trigeminal nerves and modulate specific brain regions associated with pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Sparrow Ascent Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN)
  • Device: Sham Control Device
N/A

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single-center, clinical trial in which 20 patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment groups:

  1. Group 1 (n=10): Active tAN + standard care

  2. Group 2 (n=10): Sham tAN + standard care

Stimulation:

Participants undergoing lumbar fusion surgery will be randomized to receive either active or sham tAN treatment according to the following time points:

  • Pre-operative: 30 minutes in the hour prior to surgery

  • Intra-operative: 30 minutes before the end of surgery

  • Post-operative: 30 minutes at 3 and 6 hours after surgery

  • Inpatient: Four 30-minute sessions on Day 2

Blood Draws

Participants will have blood samples collected at the following time points:
  • Day 1 (Day of Surgery)

  • Day 2 (Day 1 post-surgical)

Follow up Visits Participants will have study follow up visits on Days 7 and Day 14. These visits can either be conducted either via a secure telehealth video visit, or in person visit.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized, double blind, sham controlled.Randomized, double blind, sham controlled.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Masking Description:
On the day of surgery, subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either the active stimulation group or the sham group. In the sham group, the device looks like the active device, but it will not deliver any electrical stimulation to the vagus or trigeminal nerves. Both groups will receive the SOC for post-operative pain management for lumbar fusion patients.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Delivering Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation as an Adjunct Non-Opioid Pain Management Therapy for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Active tAN + standard of care (SOC) for post-operative pain management for lumbar fusion patients.

Subjects will be randomized to receive the active device on the day of surgery. Subjects will receive treatment according to the following time points: Pre-operative: 30 minutes in the hour prior to surgery Intra-operative: 30 minutes before the end of surgery Post-operative: 30 minutes at 3 and 6 hours after surgery Inpatient: Four 30-minute sessions on Day 2

Device: Sparrow Ascent Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN)
This method of simultaneous vagal and trigeminal stimulation via the external ear is known as transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN), as the targets of electrical stimulation include the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and auriculotemporal nerve (ATN), which is a branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve. Electrodes applied to select dermatome regions can target ear neural structures and deliver non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS). Use of tAN for pain relief is an attractive alternative to pharmacologic and opioid-based approaches because it is safe and effective and presents no addiction liability.

Placebo Comparator: Sham tAN + standard of care (SOC) for post-operative pain management for lumbar fusion patients.

Subjects will be randomized to receive the sham device on the day of surgery. Subjects will receive treatment according to the following time points: Pre-operative: 30 minutes in the hour prior to surgery Intra-operative: 30 minutes before the end of surgery Post-operative: 30 minutes at 3 and 6 hours after surgery Inpatient: Four 30-minute sessions on Day 2

Device: Sham Control Device
This device looks like the active device, but no stimulation will be delivered.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3 hours post-operation [Baseline, 3 hours post-operation]

    Patients will be asked to report their level of pain using the Visual Analog Scale. Possible scores for VAS pain scale ranges from 0-10 where 0="no pain" to 10="severe pain"

  2. Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 hours post-operation [Baseline, 6 hours post-operation]

    Patients will be asked to report their level of pain using the Visual Analog Scale. Possible scores for VAS pain scale ranges from 0-10 where 0="no pain" to 10="severe pain"

  3. Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at day 2 post-operation [Baseline, day 2 post-operation]

    Patients will be asked to report their level of pain using the Visual Analog Scale. Possible scores for VAS pain scale ranges from 0-10 where 0="no pain" to 10="severe pain"

  4. Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at day 14 post-operation [Baseline, day 14 post-operation]

    Patients will be asked to report their level of pain using the Visual Analog Scale. Possible scores for VAS pain scale ranges from 0-10 where 0="no pain" to 10="severe pain"

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose) at 3 hours post-surgery [3 hours post-surgery]

    During the in-patient hospital stay, the dose and frequency of post -operative opioid use will recorded for both the placebo and active groups. The opioid usage between the 2 groups will be compared to determine if the active group required less opioid medications for pain reduction.

  2. Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose) at 6 hours post-surgery [6 hours post-surgery]

    During the in-patient hospital stay, the dose and frequency of post -operative opioid use will recorded for both the placebo and active groups. The opioid usage between the 2 groups will be compared to determine if the active group required less opioid medications for pain reduction.

  3. Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose) at Day 2 post-surgery [Day 2 post-surgery]

    During the in-patient hospital stay, the dose and frequency of post -operative opioid use will recorded for both the placebo and active groups. The opioid usage between the 2 groups will be compared to determine if the active group required less opioid medications for pain reduction.

  4. Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose) at Day 7 post-surgery [Day 7 post-surgery]

    During the in-patient hospital stay, the dose and frequency of post -operative opioid use will recorded for both the placebo and active groups. The opioid usage between the 2 groups will be compared to determine if the active group required less opioid medications for pain reduction.

  5. Mean total postoperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose) at Day 14 post-surgery [Day 14 post-surgery]

    During the in-patient hospital stay, the dose and frequency of post -operative opioid use will recorded for both the placebo and active groups. The opioid usage between the 2 groups will be compared to determine if the active group required less opioid medications for pain reduction.

  6. Mean percent change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline at Day 1 (intra-op) [Baseline and at Day 1 (intra-op)]

    CRP blood samples collected will be used to measure the amount of inflammation in the body at the time points stated, and changes will be recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein will be determined by the immunoprecipitation method using an in vitro diagnostic assay.

  7. Mean percent change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline at 6 hours post-op [Baseline and at 6 hours post-op]

    CRP blood samples collected will be used to measure the amount of inflammation in the body at the time points stated, and changes will be recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein will be determined by the immunoprecipitation method using an in vitro diagnostic assay.

  8. Mean percent change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline at Day 2 post-op [Baseline and at Day 2 post-op]

    CRP blood samples collected will be used to measure the amount of inflammation in the body at the time points stated, and changes will be recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein will be determined by the immunoprecipitation method using an in vitro diagnostic assay.

  9. Mean percent change in TNF-alpha levels from baseline at Day 1 (intra-op) [Baseline and at Day 1 (intra-op)]

    TNF-alpha blood samples collected will be used to measure the amount of inflammation in the body at the time points stated, and changes will be recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

  10. Mean percent change in TNF-alpha levels from baseline at 6 hours post-op [Baseline and at 6 hours post-op]

    TNF-alpha blood samples collected will be used to measure the amount of inflammation in the body at the time points stated, and changes will be recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

  11. Surgery time (incision to closure) [Day 1- during surgery [Surgery start (incision) to closure of surgical site]]

    A comparison of the surgery times from incision to closure will be compared between the 2 groups to determine if the tAN affects the surgery time. The times will be recorded for each case, and then compared between the two groups. Surgery time - calculated as time from first incision to closure.

  12. Estimated mean total blood loss [Day 1- During surgery [Surgery start (incision) to closure]]

    The volume of blood loss will be recorded for each case, and then the 2 groups will be compared. Comparision is based on end volume recorded at incision closure.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Medically cleared to undergo a lumbar fusion surgery

  2. 18-85 years of age

  3. English Proficiency

  4. Participants must be able to provide informed consent and function at an intellectual level sufficient for study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Current evidence of an uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition

  2. History of bleeding disorders or coagulopathy

  3. History of seizures or epilepsy

  4. History of neurological diseases or traumatic brain injury

  5. Use of illegal recreational drugs

  6. Presence of devices, e.g. pacemakers, cochlear prosthesis, neuro-stimulators

  7. Use of acupuncture within 4 weeks of surgery

  8. Grossly abnormal external ear anatomy or active ear infection

  9. Women of childbearing potential, not using effective contraception per investigator judgment or not willing to comply with contraception for the duration of the study

  10. Females who are pregnant or lactating

  11. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas United States 75390

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alex Valadka, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Alex Valadka, Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06100172
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • STU-2023-0197
First Posted:
Oct 25, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Oct 25, 2023
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Alex Valadka, Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 25, 2023