Preventing Propofol-associated Injection Pain

Sponsor
Benaroya Research Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00864682
Collaborator
(none)
156
1
3
15
10.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Injection of propofol is associated with discomfort in subsets of patients. Local anesthetics have been shown to attenuate this response in some patients. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tests the hypothesis that lidocaine mixed with propofol will be superior to lidocaine administered directly into the vein, under tourniquet control, prior to injection of propofol. Both groups are expected to be superior to placebo.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Saline
  • Drug: Lidocaine / propofol admixture
  • Drug: lidocaine pretreatment
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
156 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Propofol Mixed With Lidocaine Versus Lidocaine Pretreatment With Tourniquet for Alleviation of Pain Associated With Propofol Injection
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Saline pretreatment, saline admixture

Drug: Saline
3.3 mL normal saline

Active Comparator: Lidocaine pretreatment

Lidocaine pretreatment / saline-propofol admixture

Drug: lidocaine pretreatment
lidocaine 50 mg iv under tourniquet-control

Active Comparator: Lidocaine-Propofol admixture

saline pretreatment / Lidocaine-propofol admixture

Drug: Lidocaine / propofol admixture
lidocaine 50 mg plus propofol 50 mg intravenous (iv)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Verbal Pain Score [Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment.]

    11 point verbal pain score (VPS) 0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Complete Alleviation of Injection Pain [Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment]

    Total subjects within the arm versus those subjects who had no pain with injection (VPS=0)

  2. Satisfaction With Anesthetic Technique [Prior to discharge. One time assessment]

    Were you satisfied with the anesthetic technique? Yes/No

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion criteria:
  • weight >40kg, <100kg

  • ambulatory surgery

Exclusion criteria:
  • allergy to propofol or lidocaine

  • taking opioids, benzodiazepines, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Benaroya Research Institute Seattle Washington United States 98101

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Benaroya Research Institute

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph M Neal, MD, Virginia Mason Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Joseph Neal, PI, Benaroya Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00864682
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 06091
First Posted:
Mar 19, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Jan 27, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021
Keywords provided by Joseph Neal, PI, Benaroya Research Institute
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Patients entered were recruited between January 2008 and March 2009. Hospital / ambulatory surgery setting
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 52 51 53
COMPLETED 50 50 51
NOT COMPLETED 2 1 2

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm Total
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 52 51 53 156
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
42
80.8%
41
80.4%
38
71.7%
121
77.6%
>=65 years
10
19.2%
10
19.6%
15
28.3%
35
22.4%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
53
(14)
54
(14)
52
(17)
53
(15)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
30
57.7%
23
45.1%
26
49.1%
79
50.6%
Male
22
42.3%
28
54.9%
27
50.9%
77
49.4%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
52
100%
51
100%
53
100%
156.0
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Verbal Pain Score
Description 11 point verbal pain score (VPS) 0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain
Time Frame Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture
Measure Participants 50 50 51
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Units on a scale]
3
0
0
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Arm, Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm, Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Comments Hypothesis: Lidocaine / propofol admixture would be superior to lidocaine pretreatment for attenuating propofol-induced injection pain. Sample size calculated to detect a difference of at least 2 VPS points; beta 0.8.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Kruskal-Wallis
Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Complete Alleviation of Injection Pain
Description Total subjects within the arm versus those subjects who had no pain with injection (VPS=0)
Time Frame Immediately after injection of study drug. One time assessment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture
Measure Participants 50 50 51
Number [Participants]
14
26.9%
28
54.9%
40
75.5%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Arm, Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm, Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.008
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments Fisher's exact test after chi-squared
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Satisfaction With Anesthetic Technique
Description Were you satisfied with the anesthetic technique? Yes/No
Time Frame Prior to discharge. One time assessment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture
Measure Participants 50 50 51
Yes
42
80.8%
48
94.1%
51
96.2%
No
8
15.4%
2
3.9%
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Arm/Group Description saline pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture saline pretreatment, lidocaine plus propofol admixture lidocaine pretreatment, saline plus propofol admixture
All Cause Mortality
Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/52 (0%) 0/51 (0%) 0/53 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Control Arm Lidocaine / Propofol Admixture Arm Lidocaine Pretreatment Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/52 (0%) 0/51 (0%) 0/53 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Joseph M. Neal, MD
Organization Virginia Mason Medical Center
Phone 206-223-6980
Email anejmn@vmmc.org
Responsible Party:
Joseph Neal, PI, Benaroya Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00864682
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 06091
First Posted:
Mar 19, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Jan 27, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021