POST: Palliative Care and Oncology Survey on Terminology
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The term '"cancer survivors" is widely used but has different definitions. One definition describes "cancer survivors" as individuals from the time of diagnosis throughout their lives, which includes people living with cancer and people free of cancer. The views of some groups included in this definition of "cancer survivors" have rarely been assessed, including those with cancer on anticancer treatment and those known to palliative care. How they view these terms could have important implications for how they receive care services.
This is an international multi-centre observational study. It aims to recruit 3830 patients internationally across Australia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. Participants known to cancer and/or palliative care hospital or hospice services as inpatients, outpatients or community patients will be asked to complete a survey during a one-off visit which should last under 30 minutes. The survey asks a series of questions to determine the perceptions of patients know to cancer and palliative care services about the terminologies used to describe them.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Despite widespread use of the term "cancer survivor", its meaning is not standardised or universally understood. The most widely used definition incorporates individuals from the time of diagnosis throughout their lives, which includes people living with cancer and people free of cancer. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2022) subscribes to this description, and divides survivorship into three phases: individuals with early-stage cancer where the goal is curative intent, individuals with advanced or metastatic cancer where the goal is to prolong life, and individuals with end-stage cancer where the goal is end-of-life care. It presents these as a continuum. It has been suggested that the term, "cancer survivor," is not designed to be a label, but rather to describe a population of people who have a history of cancer (NCI, 2022), recognising that the heterogeneous group encompassed by this term may not all subscribe to it. The perception of patients towards "cancer survivor" in their context has been sought for a variety of groups, generally including patients without progressive disease who have completed treatment, or those undergoing treatment. These individuals have various attitudes towards their inclusion in the term, with some considering it inappropriate, and others finding the group too diverse to be acceptable. One group may be patients known to palliative care services. Palliative care aims to provide holistic care for individuals with health-related suffering due to severe illness to improve the quality of life of patients, their families and caregivers, particularly at the end of life. These patients also fit the definition of 'cancer survivors' using the NCI's definition. There is a particular paucity of evidence on their opinion on survivorship terminology, which may have important implications for patients' receipt of care and the adoption and understanding of this terminology within palliative care services.
The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions of heterogeneous groups of patients known to oncology and palliative care services regarding the terminologies used to describe them, and in particular the term "cancer survivor." This is an international, multicentre, observational study. The study will seek participants known to oncology and palliative care services in 2 target groups in Australia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA). The overall lead investigator of the study will be based in Our Lady's Hospice & Care Services, Dublin, Ireland. Each country will have a national site lead who will obtain ethical approval and manage patient recruitment within their country. The overall Principal Investigator (PI) and his research team will lead recruitment in Ireland and overall governance for the study. Established researchers will be identified to lead the project in Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA. They will be required to identify local sites, obtain local ethical / research approval, and provide local support to the overall PI and research team. The study will recruit 383 individuals in Groups 1 and 2 in each area i.e., 1915 individuals for each Group, and 3830 individuals overall.
The study involves a single assessment, which should take 15-30 minutes (and involves completion of a study-specific English-language questionnaire). Case Record Forms (CRFs) will be amended for each country relating to local specifications for education and ethnicity. There will be 2 sections - a researcher section and a participant section, consisting of 3 parts, to complete. Data will be recorded on paper CRFs and transferred onto a secure online platform.
The study will conform to the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) (2018) and equivalent legislation in the different countries. All data will be treated as confidential, and data will be pseudonymised to protect the participants' identities. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe individual country data. Quantitative data analysis will be carried out using SPSS software and appropriate statistical tests.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the International Conference on Harmonisation guidance on Good Clinical Practice. Investigators are responsible for ensuring that appropriate ethical (and other necessary) approvals are in place before the study commences at their study site. The study is considered low risk, and not burdensome for participants.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Group 1 Individuals with a diagnosis of cancer known to palliative care services. This group completes Case Report Form for Group 1. |
Other: Palliative Care and Oncology Survey on Terminology (POST)
Each group receives a survey to complete. The only difference between the two is the inclusion criteria; the surveys are the same.
|
| Group 2 Individuals with a diagnosis of cancer receiving anti-cancer treatment known to oncology services. This group completes Case Report Form for Group 2 |
Other: Palliative Care and Oncology Survey on Terminology (POST)
Each group receives a survey to complete. The only difference between the two is the inclusion criteria; the surveys are the same.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The proportion of individuals with cancer known to palliative care services (Group 1) and the proportion of individuals on anti-cancer treatment (Group 2) that would "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" being described as a cancer survivor. [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
The proportion of individuals with cancer throughout the study known to palliative care services (Group 1), and the proportion of individuals with cancer throughout the study on anti-cancer treatment (Group 2), that would "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" being described as a cancer survivor. This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the two Groups throughout the whole study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The proportions of these groups (Group 1 and Group 2) that "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" being described as a patient, client, consumer, customer, service user, cancer patient, patient with cancer, and person living with cancer. [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
The proportions of these groups of individuals (Group 1 and Group 2) throughout the study that "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" being described as a patient, client, consumer, customer, service user, cancer patient, patient with cancer, and person living with cancer. This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the two Groups throughout the whole study.
- The proportion of these groups (Group 1 and Group 2) that think the specific subgroups of patients with cancer should be known as "cancer survivors": [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
The proportion of these groups of individuals (Group 1 and Group 2) throughout the study that think the specific subgroups of patients with cancer should be known as "cancer survivors". This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the two Groups throughout the whole study.
- The proportion of these groups (Group 1 and Group 2) that "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" the widely used definition of "cancer survivor". [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
The proportion of these groups of individuals (Group 1 and Group 2) throughout the study that "moderately dislike" or "strongly dislike" the widely used definition of "cancer survivor". This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the two Groups throughout the whole study.
- Any association between perception towards the term cancer survivor and phase of cancer illness, cancer diagnosis and performance status. [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
Any association between perception towards the term cancer survivor and phase of cancer illness, cancer diagnosis and performance status. This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the participants throughout the whole study.
- Any association between perception towards the term cancer survivor and personal demographic details including country of residence, age, gender, marital status, educational attainment, and ethnicity. [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
Any association between perception towards the term cancer survivor and personal demographic details including country of residence, age, gender, marital status, educational attainment, and ethnicity. This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining this outcome for the participants throughout the whole study.
- Any differences in the outcomes between the two Groups [at study completion, an average of 1 year]
Any differences in the outcomes between the two Groups. This is not assessing change between two time points in the study, but determining differences in the outcomes above between the two Groups, determined from data collected throughout the whole study.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Group 1: Individuals with a diagnosis of cancer known to palliative care services
Inclusion criteria:
-
Diagnosis of cancer
-
Under the care of palliative care services as an inpatient, outpatient or community patient
-
Age ≥18 years
-
Able to speak / read English (enough to complete questionnaire)
Exclusion criteria:
-
Unable to provide consent
-
Unable to complete questionnaire
Group 2: Individuals with a diagnosis of cancer receiving anti-cancer treatment known to oncology services
Inclusion criteria:
-
Diagnosis of cancer
-
Under the care of oncology services and currently receiving an anticancer treatment regimen of any kind
-
Age ≥18 years
-
Able to speak / read English (enough to complete questionnaire)
Exclusion criteria:
-
Unable to provide consent
-
Unable to complete questionnaire
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St James's Hospital | Dublin | Ireland | D08 X9HD | |
| 2 | Tallaght University Hospital | Dublin | Ireland | D24 NR0A | |
| 3 | Amy Taylor | Dublin | Ireland | D6W RY72 | |
| 4 | Royal Surrey County Hospital | Guildford | Surrey | United Kingdom | GU2 7XX |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrew N Davies, MBBS MSc MD, Our Lady's Hospice & Care Services
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Cheung SY, Delfabbro P. Are you a cancer survivor? A review on cancer identity. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):759-71. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0521-z. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
- Costa DSJ, Mercieca-Bebber R, Tesson S, Seidler Z, Lopez AL. Patient, client, consumer, survivor or other alternatives? A scoping review of preferred terms for labelling individuals who access healthcare across settings. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e025166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025166.
- Marzorati C, Riva S, Pravettoni G. Who Is a Cancer Survivor? A Systematic Review of Published Definitions. J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):228-237. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-0997-2.
- Radbruch L, De Lima L, Knaul F, Wenk R, Ali Z, Bhatnaghar S, Blanchard C, Bruera E, Buitrago R, Burla C, Callaway M, Munyoro EC, Centeno C, Cleary J, Connor S, Davaasuren O, Downing J, Foley K, Goh C, Gomez-Garcia W, Harding R, Khan QT, Larkin P, Leng M, Luyirika E, Marston J, Moine S, Osman H, Pettus K, Puchalski C, Rajagopal MR, Spence D, Spruijt O, Venkateswaran C, Wee B, Woodruff R, Yong J, Pastrana T. Redefining Palliative Care-A New Consensus-Based Definition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):754-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 6.
- Wee M, Dau H, Gastonguay L, De Vera MA. How do individuals with colorectal cancer perceive the term "cancer survivor": a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Apr;16(2):257-268. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01015-9. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
- 3602