FOLRT: Induction FOLFIRINOX Followed by Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Sponsor
Campus Bio-Medico University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05399394
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
71

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

There is no a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. There is a potential role for neoadjuvant therapy to treat micrometastatic disease with chemotherapy, as well as for the treatment of local disease with radiotherapy. The investigators evaluated the safety and efficacy of induction FOLFIRINOX followed by a high weekly dose of gemcitabine concurrent to radiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Continued optimization in multimodality therapy and an accurate patient selection remain crucial points for the appropriate treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. In all patients an accurate pre-treatment staging was performed, including multilayer CT scan, positron emission computed tomography (PET-CT) with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and laparoscopy with peritoneal washing. Patients with the evidence of metastatic disease were excluded, and thus only a small number of patients was consequently enrolled with this approach.The induction phase of the treatment plan was designed to administer FOLFIRINOX protocol (oxaliplatin 85 mg/mq and irinotecan 180 mg/mq plus leucovorin 400 mg/mq followed by bolus FU 400 mg/mq on day 1, then FU 2,400 mg/mq as a 46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days for four cycles. In the combined phase of the treatment radiotherapy target volumes were established by CT scan and PET-CT scan. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine at the dose of 600 mg/mq weekly. Four weeks after the completion of radiochemotherapy, restaging including CT scan and PET-CT scan was performed. Tumor response was defined in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition through CT scan and PET-CT scan. Surgery was considered in patients whose tumors were technically resectable. After resection, patients were evaluated every three months by means of a standard surveillance protocol that included history and physical examination, cross-sectional imaging and measurement of serum markers, and the intervals were extended to six months after two years

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Induction FOLFIRINOX Followed by Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: LAPC patients

Patients treated with induction FOLFIRINOX; for patients without disease progression as detected through restaging exams, chemotherapy was followed by chemoradiation which consisted of conformal radiation therapy and concurrent gemcitabine at the dose of 600 mg/mq weekly.

Drug: Chemotherapy
The induction phase of the treatment plan was designed to administer FOLFIRINOX protocol (oxaliplatin 85 mg/mq and irinotecan 180 mg/mq plus leucovorin 400 mg/mq followed by bolus fluorouracil (FU) 400 mg/mq on day 1, then FU 2,400 mg/mq as a 46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days for four cycles. In the combined phase, concurrent chemotherapy consisted of weekly gemcitabine at the dose of 600 mg/mq.
Other Names:
  • Induction therapy
  • Radiation: Radiation
    Radiotherapy target volumes are established by CT scan and PET-CT scan. Radiotherapy is delivered with a total dose of 54-59 Gy with fractionation of 1.8 Gy daily for 5 days a week. The Planning Target Volume (PTV) is defined by the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) with a safety margin to include organ motion and set-up errors. Organs at risk for radiation-induced side effects are contoured on the dose planning CT and dose volume histograms (DVH) are calculated. All treatments are delivered with a multifield isocentric technique using a multileaf collimator. A quality-control protocol are applied through cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT) for all patients to evaluate the precision of the set-up.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [four months]

      During treatment, patients are evaluated through a directed history, weekly physical examination and blood exams. The occurrence and nature of any adverse events are recorded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 4.02) scale. When multiple treatment-related adverse events of the same type occurred in the same patient, only the most severe ones are reported. Subsequently, the dose of chemotherapy is adjusted according to the number of occurrences of grade 2 or greater events.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall Survival [3 years]

      Overall Survival (OS) is determined from the day of the histological diagnosis. OS curves are calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

    2. Progression-free survival [3 years]

      Progression-free survival (PFS) is obtained from the beginning of treatment to the observation of progression/recurrence, or to last follow-up if no event is observed. PFS curves are calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

    3. Metastases-free survival [3 years]

      Metastases-free survival (MFS) is obtained from the beginning of treatment to the observation of distant progression, or to last follow-up if no event is observed. MFS curves are calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

    4. Incidence of Local-regional Tumor Control [3 years]

      Patients are not considered to have local-regional control unless they achieve at least a partial response of their primary tumor or stable disease by imaging. Patients who do not achieve objective response are considered to have local-regional failure. Local-regional control rates are analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • proven cytological or histological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma;

    • borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic tumours;

    • no previous radiochemotherapy to abdomen;

    • 0-I Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status;

    • adequate cardiac, liver and kidney function and a good bone marrow reserve.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • resectable and metastatic disease;

    • previous or concomitant malignant disease;

    • one or more of the following clinical conditions: infection, pregnancy or breast-feeding, liver failure, kidney failure, Pa O2 < 65 mmHg, Pa carbon dioxide (CO2) > 40 mmHg, mental disability.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Campus Bio-Medico University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Michele Fiore, MD, Campus Bio-Medico University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Campus Bio-Medico University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05399394
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2016-000696-25
    First Posted:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Campus Bio-Medico University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 1, 2022