Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer

Sponsor
Hani Alhadad (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04823832
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
24
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head cancer and high bilirubin level, were stratified into two equal groups according to the method of biliary drainage: endoscopic stenting or percutaneous drainage.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: pancreaticoduodenectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

Along with history taking and complete clinical examination, the results of complete blood count, international normalized ratio , renal and liver function tests were obtained. Patients with coagulopathy were corrected by fresh frozen plasma and repeated vitamin K injections to reach an INR of at least 1.4 before the intervention, otherwise, they were excluded. Besides, ultrasound and computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis (pancreatic protocol) were routinely undertaken. Tumors were staged for resectability according to TNM staging system.

Patients were randomly divided by closed envelope method into two groups; patients were allocated to the first group (ERCP) who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography coupled with placement of a 10-French plastic stent; and to the second group (PTD) who underwent Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage.

Preoperative biliary drainage Parenteral broad spectrum antibiotics were administered prior and after each intervention. ERCP was performed under general anesthesia in the operation room and a 10-french (3.2 mm) covered polyethylene stent with side flaps to prevent migration was placed below the level of biliary bifurcation. Stents were inserted over a guidewire via an Olympus 4.2 mm channel endoscope, by standard techniques.

PTD was placed in the interventional radiology department under local anesthesia via the left duct sub-xiphoid approach, only via the external approach. A 6 french gauge catheter was positioned with its tip above the biliary obstruction. After PTD, patients were instructed to drink a lot of fluids to replace fluid loss or they were given temporary intravenous fluid supplementation.

After either procedure, patients were either discharged home or kept in hospital. Those who were discharged were readmitted for preoperative preparation. Patients were followed up clinically as well as by laboratory results. The total and direct bilirubin level and other liver function tests were repeated after ten days from the procedure to estimate the decline in their levels. Post-intervention complications either PTD-related such as bleeding, cholangitis, bile leak and catheter occlusion/displacement; or ERCP-related such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding and stent displacement; were recorded.

Surgery After improvement of liver functions, patients were scheduled for PD. All operations were performed through a hockey-stick incision by consultant surgeons experienced in pancreatic surgery. The standard surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation. The effects of pre-operative drainage were evaluated during the operation in terms of operative resection time, blood loss, difficulties of dissection and intra-operative bleeding. While the endoscopic stent is removed intra-operatively after transection of the common hepatic duct, the catheter of PTD is left and inserted in the hepaticojejunostomy (stented anastomosis) to be removed two weeks later. Perioperative complications (< 30 days) were stratified for each group according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer With Hyperbilirubinemia and Impact on Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: ERCP group

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with plastic stent insertion

Procedure: pancreaticoduodenectomy
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
Other Names:
  • whipple operation
  • Active Comparator: PTD group

    ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic catheter insertion

    Procedure: pancreaticoduodenectomy
    resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
    Other Names:
  • whipple operation
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. number of participants with operative difficulties as assessed by the operating surgeon [up to 6 hours at the time of surgery]

      measuring the difficulty of dissection, number of operative complications encountered

    2. number of participants with post operative complications [up to one month]

      detection of postoperative complications in the early postoperative period

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. number of participants with postprocedural complications [up to one month after each procedure]

      detection of postprocedure complications

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with malignant obstruction of the distal common bile duct e.g. adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or periampullary tumor

    • Hyperbilirubinemia, total bilirubin level more than 10 mg/dL

    • Cholangitis, pruritis, coagulopathy, nausea and anorexia

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with advanced disease

    • metastatic disease

    • Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Faculty of Medicine Alexandria Egypt

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hani Alhadad

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Wael N Abdelsalam, doctor, dean of faculty

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hani Alhadad, assistant professor, Alexandria University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04823832
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 30/11
    First Posted:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 1, 2021