Paraspinous Anesthetic Block for Non-Responsive Pelvic Pain

Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01635205
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
19
3.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study examines randomized triple-blind clinical trial and the efficacy of paraspinous anesthetic block on the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in patients non-responsive to pharmacological management. Sixty patients will be randomly divided and allocated into group intervention (paraspinous anesthetic block) and control (placebo procedure in subcutaneous tissue).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: paraspinous anesthetic block
  • Procedure: subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Patients will be allocated into one of two groups (intervention or placebo), and will be submitted to the corresponding procedure (paraspinous anesthetic block or placebo puncture in subcutaneous tissue). In the first appointment, pain will be measured with the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale); quality of life and function basal level will be evaluated by scales SF-36 (Medical Outcome Short-Form (36)Health Survey)and FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), in Portuguese validated versions. Procedure will be realized as planned for each group.

Second appointment will occur one week after the procedure, and VAS scale will be applied.

Third appointment will occur in one month. VAS scale will be applied again,and procedure will be repeated if patient does not have a reduction of at least 30% of pain.

Next consultations will occur at two months, three months, four months and five months, with application of VAS scale to keep monitoring evolution of pain.

At six months of study, VAS scale will be applied along with SF-36 and FSFI questionnaires, to evaluate improvement in pain and in quality of life and function level.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Paraspinous Anesthetic Block in Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain Non-Responsive to Pharmacological Treatment
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: paraspinous block

Paraspinous anesthetic block in the thoracolumbar region, in sensitized segments

Procedure: paraspinous anesthetic block
Paraspinous anesthetic block with lidocaine 1% in sensitized segments of the thoracolumbar region

Sham Comparator: control

Subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect

Procedure: subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Subcutaneous puncture with injection needle (no substance will be injected)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change of pain from baseline [Change of pain from baseline at one week, at one month, at two months, at three months, at four months, at five months and at six months]

    Primary outcome is the reduction of pain, measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement of scores in SF-36 scale [At baseline and at six months]

    Quality of life will be evaluated with SF-36 scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.

  2. Improvement of scores in the FSFI scale [At baseline and at six months]

    Sexual function as a measure of functionality will be evalueted with the FSFI scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with benign pelvic pain non-responsive to pharmacological treatment, lasting at least 6 months, located in the anatomic pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, infra-umbilical region, lumbossacral region or buttocks. Pain must be hard enough to cause functional impairment or to motivate medical counseling. The absence of physical findings does not decreases the importance of pain, nether excludes the possibility of pelvic pathology.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who do not want to take part in the study

  • Age under 18 years old

  • Pelvic pain lasting less than 6 months

  • Relief or resolution of pain with pharmacological treatment

  • Pain of neoplastic origin

  • Known allergy or report of adverse reaction related to lidocaine

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen F Rosa, MD, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Study Chair: Antonio C Santos, doctor, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Study Chair: Ricardo F Savaris, doctor, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Study Chair: Vinícius A Amantéa, MD, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01635205
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GPPG 110082
First Posted:
Jul 9, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Apr 24, 2014
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2014
Keywords provided by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 24, 2014