Effects of Ecological Rythmic-acoustic Stimulation (E-RAS) on Motor Skills in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

Sponsor
University of Cagliari (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03228888
Collaborator
(none)
32
1
2
32
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances induced by Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the stimuli used to provide RAS consist of metronome or music-based sounds, which are not related with the auditory experience of walking. Based on previous laboratory research, it is hypothesized that the use of ecological sounds deriving from biological motion (i.e., footstep sounds) could have a greater impact compared to artificial sounds (i.e., metronome sounds), within a rehabilitation program. In a double-blind experiment, it was investigated the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-two individuals affected by PD (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1,5-3) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (artificial vs. ecological sounds). Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. The results revealed that the rehabilitation program integrated with RAS had positive effects on the majority of objective and subjective measures, independently of the type of sound. However, when the two groups were examined separately, the patients assigned to the ecological RAS condition were the only who improved both in terms of cadence and gait speed. Overall, the hypothesized greater effect of the ecological sounds compared to artificial sounds was only partially supported by data.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (artificial or ecological RAS) and were evaluated in three moments: before the rehabilitative treatment (T0), at the end of the 5 week rehabilitative treatment (T5), and 3 months after the end of the treatment, namely 17 weeks after the first assessment (T17).Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (artificial or ecological RAS) and were evaluated in three moments: before the rehabilitative treatment (T0), at the end of the 5 week rehabilitative treatment (T5), and 3 months after the end of the treatment, namely 17 weeks after the first assessment (T17).
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effects of Ecological Rythmic-acoustic Stimulation (E-RAS) on Motor Skills in Individuals
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Artificial Sounds

Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played a metronome tick at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence. Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.

Other: Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player

Experimental: Ecological Sounds

Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played an ecological rhythmic sound obtained by actual footsteps of human at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence. Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.

Other: Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Walking speed [5 weeks]

    Walking speed calculated on a 10 m path using motion-capture system

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Hip Flexion-extension [5 weeks]

    Angle of flexion-extension of hip joint during a gait cycle

  2. Knee Flexion-extension [5 weeks]

    Angle of flexion-extension of knee joint during a gait cycle

  3. Ankle Dorsi- Plantar-flexion [5 weeks]

    Angle of dorsi- plantar-flexion of ankle joint during a gait cycle

  4. GPS [5 weeks]

    Gait Profile Score (synthetic index of deviation from a physiologic gait pattern)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • diagnosis of PD according to the UK Brain Bank criteria;

  • ability to walk independently;

  • absence of relevant hearing impairments which could prevent the correct perception of the auditory cues;

  • absence of significant cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) > 24; Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) > 13);

  • absence of psychiatric or severe systemic illnesses;

  • mild-to-moderate disability assessed by means of the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) staging scale (1,5 ≤ H&Y ≤ 3);

  • no engagement in any rehabilitative program in the 3 months before the beginning of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 General Hospital "G. Brotzu" Cagliari Italy 09100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Cagliari

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Massimiliano Pau, Associate Professor, University of Cagliari
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03228888
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PG/2014/17870
First Posted:
Jul 25, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jul 25, 2017
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Massimiliano Pau, Associate Professor, University of Cagliari
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 25, 2017