The Effect of a Motor-cognitive Rehabilitation on Attention in Parkinsonian Patients

Sponsor
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02727257
Collaborator
(none)
103
1
2
3.9
26.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study the Investigators explore two questions: if the attentive reaction times differs in parkinsonian patients from health controls and if an intensive, focused and aerobic rehabilitation program (Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment - MIRT) tailored mainly for motor problems, could have a specific positive effect on multiple choices Reaction Times (RTs) as an indirect marker for an effect on attentional-executive frontal circuits. The hypothesis is that the MIRT could have a positive effect on the top-down control mechanisms, since the continuous feedback given by physiotherapist during exercises and the use of cues and devices (such as treadmill plus and stabilometric platform), stimulate the selective attention processes that enable goal-directed, internally-driven decision, helping the patients to overcome externally-driven decision based on stimulus salience and novelty

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: MIRT
N/A

Detailed Description

Objective: To evaluate the attentive performances in Parkinsonians in comparison with healthy controls and the effect of motor-cognitive rehabilitation program on attention.

Methods: 103 Parkinsonians (stage 2,5-3 H&Y) hospitalized for a 4-week Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment and 34 healthy controls were enrolled. All subjects underwent three different attentive tasks: visual reaction times, auditory reaction times and multiple choices reaction times tasks. To evaluate the effect of rehabilitation on attention, patients performed the same battery at discharge. To investigate the effects of MIRT on motor functions and quality of life we also assessed UPDRS III, Timed Up and Go test and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
103 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effect of a Motor-cognitive Rehabilitation on Attention in Parkinsonian Patients
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: MIRT

MIRT consists of a 4-week physical therapy that entails four daily sessions, five days a week, in a hospital setting. The first session comprise cardiovascular warm-up activities, relaxation, muscle-stretching, exercises to improve the range of motion of spinal, pelvic and scapular joints, exercises to improve the functionality of the abdominal muscles, and postural changes in the supine position. The second session includes aerobic exercises to improve balance and gait using a stabilometric platform, treadmill plus, crossover and cycloergometer. All the exercises are aerobic. The third is a session of occupational therapy to improve autonomy in day living activities. The last session includes one hour of speech therapy.

Procedure: MIRT
MIRT consists of a 4-week physical therapy that entails four daily sessions, five days a week, in a hospital setting. The duration of each session, including recovery periods, is about one hour. The first session comprise cardiovascular warm-up activities, relaxation, muscle-stretching, exercises to improve the range of motion of spinal, pelvic and scapular joints, exercises to improve the functionality of the abdominal muscles, and postural changes in the supine position. The second session includes aerobic exercises to improve balance and gait using a stabilometric platform, treadmill plus, crossover and cycloergometer. The third is a session of occupational therapy to improve autonomy in day living activities. The last session includes one hour of speech therapy.

No Intervention: healthy controls

we assessed the attentive Reaction Times in healthy controls, that don't receive rehabilitative treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Multiple Choice Reaction Time task [4 weeks]

    The task consisted of 40 trials. The target was a number (1, 2, 3) whose presentation, on the centre of the screen, was randomized. Each number was associated to a different response buttons . In each single trial subjects had to press as quickly as possible the response button associated with the number that appeared on the screen. We evaluated the accuracy of response and recorded the time between the appearance of target and the subject's response.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Simple Choice Reaction Time task [4 weeks]

    The task consisted of 40 trials. In each single trial, the subjects had to press the response button as quickly as possible when a red circle appeared on the screen. The appearance of targets was mixed to a variable number of distractors consisting in single green circles. Targets and distractors could appear in different positions of the screen at irregular intervals (1-3 seconds). Distractors remained on the screen for 500 ms, while the target disappeared with the subject's response. We evaluated the accuracy of response and recorded the time between the appearance of target and the subject's response.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Auditory Reaction Time task [4 weeks]

    The task consisted of 40 trials. In each single trial the subjects had to press a response button as quickly as possible at the presentation of the target that consisted of an acoustic stimulus (intensity of 94 dbA) presented at irregular intervals (1-3 seconds). The stimulus ended after the subject's response. The times between the presentation of the target and the subject's response were recorded.

  2. Visual Reaction Time task [4 weeks]

    The task consisted of 40 trials. In each single trial, the subjects had to press a response button as quickly as possible at the appearance of the target that disappeared after the subject's response. Target was a red circle that appeared on the centre of screen at irregular intervals (1-3 seconds). The times between the appearance of the target and the subject's response were recorded.

  3. Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale [4 weeks]

  4. Parkinson Disease Questionnaire - 39 [4 weeks]

  5. Timed Up and Go Test [4 weeks]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
55 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • stage 2.5-3 according to the Hoehn & Yahr scale

  • pharmacological treatment for the last 8 weeks and during the hospitalization

  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24

Exclusion Criteria:
  • any focal brain lesion detected in brain imaging studies (Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging) performed in the previous twelve months

  • disabling drug-induced dyskinesias

  • disturbing resting and/or action tremor, corresponding to scores 2 to 4 in the specific items of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section 3 (UPDRS III)

  • behavioral disturbances (evaluated with Neuropsychiatric Inventory)

  • visual and auditory dysfunctions according to the general clinical evaluation and medical history

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Parkinson's Disease and Brain Injury Rehabilitation, of the 'Moriggia-Pelascini' Hospital Gravedona ed Uniti Como Italy 22015

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giuseppe Frazzitta, MD, Department of Parkinson's Disease and Brain Injury Rehabilitation, of the 'Moriggia-Pelascini' Hospital - Gravedona ed Uniti (CO, Italy)

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ilaria Zivi, MD, Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02727257
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Rehabilitation and RT in PD
First Posted:
Apr 4, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Jul 29, 2016
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Ilaria Zivi, MD, Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 29, 2016