DBS: Nurse Management of Neuromodulation Therapy

Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT02177149
Collaborator
(none)
0
2
11

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The central hypothesis is that the use of a DBS (Deep Brain Stimulation) clinical decision support system for individual patient management will enable considerable time savings compared to standard care. This hypothesis was formulated from pilot studies that showed dramatic decreases in DBS programming time compared to standard care for clinicians who used an iPad-based decision support system (99% time savings from over 4 hours to 2 minutes. Study group Parkinson's patients with DBS Systems

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Standard of Care
  • Device: DBS using Clinical Support System.
N/A

Detailed Description

In most cases these subjects have failed to maintain adequate control of their symptoms on medications alone.

The Diagnosis of PD (Parkinson's Disease) and the decision to have DBS qualifies a subject for enrollment. Subjects would be selected because they will require DBS programming.

The investigators will prospectively enroll 20 PD DBS patients at the Froedtert Movement Disorders Center (surgical targets: subthalamic nucleus (STN) or internal segment of globus pallidus (GPi). Post-operative care, patients will be randomized 1/1 to standard care or using the clinical decision support system. The DBS RN will use ImageVis3D Mobile app on the iPad to program the DBS system, this software does not interact with Froedtert imaging systems. The study team uses identified images provided by the Froedtert PACS system, de identifies them, adds a study code. The images are loaded into the software system and used to identify the leads locations. The Patients will be assessed for 6 months starting with the initial DBS programming session. Importantly, the investigators do not anticipate that the clinical decision support tool will provide the final DBS settings, nor do we anticipate that this approach will obviate the need for motor exams. The clinical decision support system will help nurses choose good initial settings and then explore around those initial settings.

The investigators will measure the time spent on DBS programming for patients in each group. The investigators will capture programming session duration, number of programming sessions and total time spent on DBS programming. The investigators will compare total time spent programming for the standard care versus the intervention group.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Mobile Computing Platform to Improve Outcomes From Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care

DBS using standard of care.

Device: Standard of Care
Patients in the standard of care arm will have their DBS programmed per standard of care which is testing multiple settings and looking for symptom relief through a trial and error process.

Experimental: DBS Clinical Support System

DBS using Clinical Support System.

Device: DBS using Clinical Support System.
The DBS RN (Registered Nurse) will use ImageVis3D Mobile app on the iPad to program the DBS system, this software does not interact with imaging systems. The study team uses identified images provided by the Froedtert PACS system, de identifies them, adds a study code. The images are loaded into the software system and used to identify the leads locations. The Patients will be assessed for 6 months starting with the initial DBS programming session. Importantly, the investigators do not anticipate that the clinical decision support tool will provide the final DBS settings, nor do the investigators anticipate that the approach will obviate the need for motor exams. The clinical decision support system will help nurses choose good initial settings and then explore around those initial settings.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Measure the effectiveness of DBS decision support system in an established clinic. [6 months]

    Patients will be assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, motor section) by a blinded rater (Dr. Hiner, movement disorders neurologist). Patients will be tested in their best "On" state (e.g.on medication, on stimulation). The investigators will compare UPDRS-III scores for the standard care versus the intervention group. The UPDRS, Motor section is performed at each visit. Patient-Reported Outcomes The study team will capture patient-reported QOL (Quality of Life) using PDQ-39 (Parkinson 's Disease Questionnaire. The PDQ-39 is a validated, widely used scale completed by the patient, and is used to assess health-related quality of life in this cohort (Jenkinson, Peto, Fitzpatrick, Greenhall, & Hyman, 1995). Patients will fill out rating scales using a web-based form on an iPad or workstation during each clinic visit.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects 18 and older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease that are scheduled for Deep Brain Stimulation for control of their symptoms and are seen at the Froedtert Neurology Outpatient Clinic.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient's that are not candidates for Deep Brain Stimulation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Butson, PhD, Medical College of Wiscosnisn

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Christopher Butson, Associate Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02177149
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB_00078062
First Posted:
Jun 27, 2014
Last Update Posted:
May 15, 2015
Last Verified:
May 1, 2015

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 15, 2015