Shock Wave Therapy Versus Neuromuscular Training in Women With Patellofemoral Pain

Sponsor
Medical University of Silesia (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03324204
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
2
53
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) versus neuromuscular training (TR) in reducing pain in women with patellofemoral pain (PFP). Women with PFP will be randomly divided into two therapeutic groups: ESWT and TR. The ESWT group will undergo extracorporeal shock wave therapy to the iliotibial band and tensor fascia latae. The TR group will be treated with neuromuscular training. The women's gait will be analysed and the strength of hip abductors and internal rotators will be measured. Additionally, the women's pain and health status will be assessed with the visual analogue scale and the Lysholm Scale. Outcomes will be registered at baseline, and then at five weeks and at three months post-therapy

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Neuromuscular Training
  • Other: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Shock Wave Therapy Versus Neuromuscular Training in Women With Patellofemoral Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Neuromuscular Training

Each session lasted 30 minutes and consisted of three sets of exercises with 20-30 repetitions. Emphasis is placed on proper knee alignment during exercise. Most of the women exhibit excessive medial rotation and adduction of the femur, resulting in knee valgus. The women will be instructed how to correct their abnormalities using mirrors as visual feedback. All exercises will be completed without pain. If the exercises are too easy, the level of difficulty will be increased individually in accordance with the rehabilitation protocol

Other: Neuromuscular Training
Each session lasted 30 minutes and consisted of three sets of exercises with 20-30 repetitions. Emphasis was placed on proper knee alignment during exercise. Most of the women exhibited excessive medial rotation and adduction of the femur, resulting in knee valgus, although knee varus was also observed. The women were instructed how to correct their abnormalities using mirrors as visual feedback. All exercises were completed without pain. If the exercises were too easy, the level of difficulty was increased individually in accordance with the rehabilitation protocol

Active Comparator: Shock Wave Therapy

The ESWT group will will meet the therapist twice in the first week, and once a week after it. ESWT will be applied to the iliotibial band and tensor fascia latae with the following parameters: pressure - 4.5 bar, emission frequency -8 Hz, number of pulses per dose -2,500 per session.

Other: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)
ESWT will be applied to the iliotibial band and tensor fascia latae muscle with the following parameters: pressure - 4.5 bar, emission frequency -8 Hz, number of pulses per dose -2,500 per session

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual Analog Scale is used to assess the subjective Pain. [Outcome measures are obtained at baseline (pre-intervention)]

    The participants are asked to make a mark on a 10 cm line that corresponds to the perceived maximal pain, peripatellar or retropatellar, they experienced during any activity or position (0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain possible)

  2. Visual Analog Scale is used to assess the subjective Pain. [Outcome measures are obtained, at five weeks after intervention.]

    The participants are asked to make a mark on a 10 cm line that corresponds to the perceived maximal pain, peripatellar or retropatellar, they experienced during any activity or position (0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain possible)

  3. Visual Analog Scale is used to assess the subjective Pain. [Outcome measures are obtained at three months after intervention]

    The participants are asked to make a mark on a 10 cm line that corresponds to the perceived maximal pain, peripatellar or retropatellar, they experienced during any activity or position (0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain possible)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Gait analysis using the Zebris FDM-TDL instrumented treadmill with pressure sensors. [Outcome measures are obtained at baseline (pre-intervention)]

    The women walk on the treadmill barefoot for three minutes in order to become accustomed to the speed belt. After that time, the angles of the joints are measured for 30 seconds. Internal rotation is demarcated at the highest peak in midstance when the contralateral limb is in the terminal stance (toe-off phase). Hip adduction is determined at the highest peak in midstance

  2. Gait analysis using the Zebris FDM-TDL instrumented treadmill with pressure sensors. [Outcome measures are obtained, at five weeks after intervention.]

    The women walk on the treadmill barefoot for three minutes in order to become accustomed to the speed belt. After that time, the angles of the joints are measured for 30 seconds. Internal rotation is demarcated at the highest peak in midstance when the contralateral limb is in the terminal stance (toe-off phase). Hip adduction is determined at the highest peak in midstance

  3. Gait analysis using the Zebris FDM-TDL instrumented treadmill with pressure sensors. [Outcome measures are obtained at three months after intervention]

    The women walk on the treadmill barefoot for three minutes in order to become accustomed to the speed belt. After that time, the angles of the joints are measured for 30 seconds. Internal rotation is demarcated at the highest peak in midstance when the contralateral limb is in the terminal stance (toe-off phase). Hip adduction is determined at the highest peak in midstance

  4. Muscle strength is tested using the Micro Fet Handheld Dynamometer. [Outcome measures are obtained at baseline (pre-intervention)]

    Muscle strength of lateral rotators, abductors of the hip is tested. Three repetitions of muscle strength testing are performed with two 30-second intervals. The participants a of re asked to press against the Dynamometer with the maximum effort for 5-7 seconds.

  5. Muscle strength is tested using the Micro Fet Handheld Dynamometer. [Outcome measures are obtained, at five weeks after intervention.]

    Muscle strength of lateral rotators, abductors of the hip is tested. Three repetitions of muscle strength testing are performed with two 30-second intervals. The participants a of re asked to press against the Dynamometer with the maximum effort for 5-7 seconds.

  6. Muscle strength is tested using the Micro Fet Handheld Dynamometer. [Outcome measures are obtained at three months after intervention]

    Muscle strength of lateral rotators, abductors of the hip is tested. Three repetitions of muscle strength testing are performed with two 30-second intervals. The participants a of re asked to press against the Dynamometer with the maximum effort for 5-7 seconds.

  7. The self-reported health status is measured using the Lysholm Questionaire (LQ) [Outcome measures are obtained at baseline (pre-intervention)]

    The participants are asked to complete the eight-item questionnaire, scored on a 0-100 weighted scale

  8. The self-reported health status is measured using the Lysholm Questionaire (LQ) [Outcome measures are obtained, at five weeks after intervention.]

    The participants are asked to complete the eight-item questionnaire, scored on a 0-100 weighted scale

  9. The self-reported health status is measured using the Lysholm Questionaire (LQ) [Outcome measures are obtained at three months after intervention]

    The participants are asked to complete the eight-item questionnaire, scored on a 0-100 weighted scale

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Knee pain for more than three months greater than three on the visual analogue scale (VAS) during at least two out of four typical activities:

  1. ascending or descending the stairs,

  2. prolonged sitting with flexed knee,

  3. running or jumping,

  4. squatting or kneeling.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Orthopaedic diagnosis other than PFP.

  2. Patients with neurological disorders, history of injury or operations within the symptomatic leg, rheumatoid disease, or pregnancy were also excluded from the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Kinesitherapy and Special Methods, SHS in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland Katowice Śląskie Poland 40-752

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Silesia

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mgdalena Dabrowska-Galas, PhD, Department of Kinesitherapy and Special Methods, SHS in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Piotr Michalik, Principal Investigator, Medical University of Silesia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03324204
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • kolanostudentki
First Posted:
Oct 27, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Oct 27, 2017
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 27, 2017