Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis

Sponsor
GE Healthcare (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01376089
Collaborator
i3 Statprobe (Industry)
304
1
2
9.1
33.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between the Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) imaging of the abdomen/pelvis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
304 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Official Title:
A Phase 4 Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL and Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Arm 1-Iodixanol

Drug: Iodixanol
Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration.
Other Names:
  • Visipaque
  • Active Comparator: Arm 2-Iopamidol

    Drug: Iopamidol
    Comparator agent iopamidol (Isovue) 370 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration.
    Other Names:
  • Isovue
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. [Within 10 minutes post contrast administration]

      Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.

    2. Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. [Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.]

      Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. [Ten minutes post contrast administration.]

      Overall Image Quality rated as 'Excellent, Adequate or Poor' by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • The subject is over 18 years old.

    • Subjects are referred to undergo a CECT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis as part of their routine clinical care.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • The subject has known allergies to iodine or any prior history of adverse reaction to iodinated CM.

    • The subject received another administration of CM within 24 hours prior to baseline or is scheduled to receive one within the 24 hour follow-up period.

    • The subject is pregnant.

    • The subject is taking metformin (e.g., Glucophage®) but is not willing or unable to discontinue at the time of the study procedure.

    • The subject manifests thyrotoxicosis or is on dialysis.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 GE Healthcare Princeton New Jersey United States 08540

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • GE Healthcare
    • i3 Statprobe

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Lauren Lim, PharmD, GE Healthcare

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    GE Healthcare
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01376089
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • GE-012-097
    First Posted:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Keywords provided by GE Healthcare

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details A total of 304 subjects were enrolled in this study, however, 5 subjects did not receive contrast media due to administrative and /or technical reason leaving 299 subjects included in the analysis.
    Pre-assignment Detail A total of 304 subjects were enrolled in this study, however, 5 subjects did not receive contrast media due to administrative and /or technical reason leaving 299 subjects included in the analysis.
    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol Arm 2-Iopamidol
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were injected with Iodixanol (Visipaque). Subjects were injected with Iopamidol (Isovue).
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 151 148
    COMPLETED 148 144
    NOT COMPLETED 3 4

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol Arm 2-Iopamidol Total
    Arm/Group Description Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 151 148 299
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    91
    60.3%
    91
    61.5%
    182
    60.9%
    >=65 years
    60
    39.7%
    57
    38.5%
    117
    39.1%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    57.8
    (15.23)
    58.5
    (15.02)
    58.1
    (15.10)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    68
    45%
    80
    54.1%
    148
    49.5%
    Male
    83
    55%
    68
    45.9%
    151
    50.5%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    65
    43%
    62
    41.9%
    127
    42.5%
    Germany
    45
    29.8%
    43
    29.1%
    88
    29.4%
    Spain
    35
    23.2%
    35
    23.6%
    70
    23.4%
    United Kingdom
    6
    4%
    8
    5.4%
    14
    4.7%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
    Description Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
    Time Frame Within 10 minutes post contrast administration

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue)
    Arm/Group Description Subjects injected with Visipaque contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort. Subjects injected with Isovue contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
    Measure Participants 151 147
    Number [Number of Subjects with discomfort]
    53
    99
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
    Description Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
    Time Frame Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Arm/Group Description Subjects injected with Visipaque 320mgI/mL contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort. Subjects injected with Isovue 370mgI/mL contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
    Measure Participants 151 147
    Discomfort of Cold
    5
    11
    Discomfort of Heat
    45
    94
    Discomfort of Pain
    5
    3
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
    Description Overall Image Quality rated as 'Excellent, Adequate or Poor' by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
    Time Frame Ten minutes post contrast administration.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Arm/Group Description Subjects injected with Visipaque 320mgI/mL contrast media. Subject injected with Isovue 370mgI/mL contrast media.
    Measure Participants 151 148
    Image Quality was Excellent
    144
    133
    Image Quality was Adequate
    7
    14
    Image Quality was Poor
    0
    1

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Arm/Group Description Subjects injected with Visipaque 320mgI/mL contrast media. Subject injected with Isovue 370mgI/mL contrast media.
    All Cause Mortality
    Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/151 (0%) 1/148 (0.7%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Acute Appendicitis 0/151 (0%) 0 1/148 (0.7%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL) Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 121/151 (80.1%) 134/148 (90.5%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrointestinal 10/151 (6.6%) 10 10/148 (6.8%) 10
    General disorders
    General disorder: Feeling Cold 8/151 (5.3%) 8 8/148 (5.4%) 8
    General Disorders: Feeling Hot 77/151 (51%) 77 92/148 (62.2%) 92
    Administration Site Conditions: Injection Site Coldness 5/151 (3.3%) 5 9/148 (6.1%) 9
    Administration Site Conditions: Injection Site Reaction 30/151 (19.9%) 30 32/148 (21.6%) 32
    Nervous system disorders
    Nervousness 13/151 (8.6%) 13 9/148 (6.1%) 9

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Lauren Lim, PharmD
    Organization GE Healthcare
    Phone 1-626-356-1937
    Email lauren.lim@ge.com
    Responsible Party:
    GE Healthcare
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01376089
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • GE-012-097
    First Posted:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2013