Automated Versus Conventional Hospital Discharge Summaries and Prescriptions

Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00670865
Collaborator
(none)
209
1
2
2
104.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a semi-automated electronic patient discharge summary program leads to increased community physician and housestaff satisfaction and patient outcomes as compared to conventional discharge reports.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Electronic discharge summary system
N/A

Detailed Description

For patients hospitalized with an acute illness, the days following discharge constitute a critical period. Patients must adjust to changes in their medications, follow up with family doctors and other specialists and know what symptoms should prompt a return to hospital. The community physicians who follow them rely on information from their hospitalization to facilitate this transition, and provide continuity of care.

Communication between hospital and community physicians is essential to this process, and has traditionally been accomplished by a dictated discharge summary. Previous studies have shown that while dictated discharge summaries can be inaccurate, incomplete, or untimely, computer generated summaries are produced more quickly and accurately. Moreover, database-generated discharge summaries are preferred by physicians in the community.

We have designed a web-based computer program with quality assurance features that automatically generates timely discharge summaries. We aim to study this program over a 2 month period on our general medicine unit by means of a randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis is that community physicians will prefer the computer generated summaries, over the standard dictated summaries. If effective, our system could be implemented more widely, and would stand to improve communication with community physicians, continuity of care, and patient safety.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
209 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Automated Versus Conventional Hospital Discharge Summaries and Prescriptions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2008

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: eDischarge

The eDischarge arm will consist of two teams on the General Internal Medicine ward at St. Michael's Hospital who have been randomly assigned to use the electronic discharge summary program.

Other: Electronic discharge summary system
The customized electronic discharge summary program will be used to generate patient discharge summaries.

No Intervention: Traditional

The traditional arm will consist of two teams on the General Internal Medicine ward at St. Michael's Hospital who have been randomly assigned to use "traditional," dictated discharge summaries.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Primary care physician satisfaction from satisfaction score assessment form with 100-mm visual analogue scale [Satisfaction score assessment form to be sent one week after patient's discharge from hospital. If form is not returned in 14 days, a reminder and second form will be sent.]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. St. Michael's Hospital housestaff satisfaction from satisfaction score assessment form with 100-mm visual analogue scale [Housestaff will fill out form upon completion of the rotation during which the study has been performed]

  2. Completion of specialist outpatient workups at St. Michael's Hospital recommended during course of hospitalization [Within the first 30 days of patient's discharge from hospital]

  3. Patient visits to Emergency Room at St. Michael's Hospital [Within the first 30 days after patient's discharge from hospital]

  4. Patient/proxy care transition assessment through the use of the CTM-3. [Phone call made to patient or proxy one week after discharge. If patient/proxy is not reached, follow up calls will be made daily until patient/proxy is reached.]

  5. Prescribing errors as assessed by comparing discharge summary to inpatient record [Upon discharge]

  6. Patient readmissions to St. Michael's Hospital [Within 30 days of discharge]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Hospitalization on General Internal Medicine ward at St. Michael's Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Transfer to another service

  • Death during admission

  • Remains in hospital past dates specified in study protocol

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5B 1W8

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Unity Health Toronto

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Maslove, MD, Unity Health Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Chaim M Bell, MD, PhD, FRCPC, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00670865
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 07-364
First Posted:
May 2, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Apr 16, 2010
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2010

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 16, 2010