Patient Performance on Virtual Reality Visual Field Devices as Compared to Standard of Care
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to study the effectiveness and patient experience when measuring visual fields using virtual reality goggles.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Adults with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma Adults with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma, who have previously had standard automated perimetry (SAP) and will receive virtual reality visual field (VRVF) as part of the standard of care |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
|
Visual Field Naive Adults Visual Field Naive Adults will receive SAP and VRVF |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry
Standard of care perimeter
|
Children with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma Children with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma, who have previously had SAP and will receive VRVF as part of the standard of care |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
|
Visual Field Naive Children Visual Field Naive Children will receive SAP and VRVF |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry
Standard of care perimeter
|
Remote Care Arm Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma participants, who have previously had SAP and will receive VRVF at their home |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
|
Ptosis Arm Patients diagnosed with Ptosis, brow ptosis, or dermatochalasis, will receive a specialized version of VRVF and SAP, specifically to detect ptosis |
Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses
Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry
Standard of care perimeter
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Sensitivity of VRVF compared to SAP [Day 1]
Sensitivity of VRVF will be determined by comparing Hodapp Anderson Parrish (HAP) Scores, which assess the severity of visual field defects, to those of SAP
- Specificity of VRVF compared to SAP [Day 1]
Specificity of VRVF will be determined by comparing Hodapp Anderson Parrish (HAP) Scores, which assess the severity of visual field defects, to those of SAP
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Variability of Mean Deviation [Day 1]
Variability of the mean deviation scores obtained from VRVF and SAP
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion:
-
Any individual who is physically able to take a virtual reality visual field test
-
Patients who either have glaucoma, are glaucoma suspects, or have a strong family history of glaucoma, or have other visual field defects, and normal individual
-
Age: Individuals who are old enough to comprehend the instructions and procedures (1-90)
Exclusion:
-
Adults unable to consent, prisoners
-
Participants who are too tired to take a visual field test
-
Participants who refuse to consent
-
Individuals who are functionally unable to use VRVF
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bascom Palmer Eye Institute | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Miami
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alana L Grajewski, MD, University of Miami
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 20210472