Patient Satisfaction With Different Numbers of Implants
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
the goal of this randomized controlled trial aimed to assess patient satisfaction for completely edentulous patients with implant overdenture retained by ball attachment over a single symphyseal , or four interforaminal implants when compared to two interforaminal ones
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
48 edentulous patients were recruited and randomized to receive either 1,2 or 4 implants for a mandibular overdenture,3 months later implants were uncovered, and ball attachments were torqued, and all overdentures were picked up ,patient satisfaction questionnaires were recorded for all patients 2 weeks after pickup 3 months ,6 months, 9 months and 1year.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: experimental single impalnts supported overdenture |
Other: implants supported overdentures
implant supported and retained with different number of implants retained by ball attachments
|
Active Comparator: active comparator two implants supported overdenture |
Other: implants supported overdentures
implant supported and retained with different number of implants retained by ball attachments
|
Other: others four implants supported overdenture |
Other: implants supported overdentures
implant supported and retained with different number of implants retained by ball attachments
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- patient satisfaction for masticatory ability, mental life comfortability with dentures [one year]
A translated into Arabic form of patient satisfaction questionnaire to match the language and environmental background of the patients was answered by all subjects, Each response was given a score range from 0 to 4 where zero represents the best result . Questionnaire was divided into three categories questions, the first section was a direct questions to the patient answered by one of some choices, and each choice had a number which will be summed up and giving a score, The second section was a visual answered question; in which patient chose from best to worst on a given scale. The marked point will be translated into a number from zero (the best) to ten (the worst). The third section was a YES/ NO questions, answered shortly by the patient in the terms of yes or No. A translated into Arabic form of patient satisfaction questionnaire to match the language and environmental background of the patients was answered by all subjects
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria
-
completely edentulous patients with restorative space of 12-15 mm,
-
keratinized gingiva of 5 mm
Exclusion criteria
-
Exclusion Criteria:
-
uncontrolled diabetes
-
bruxers
-
smokers
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Doaa Mahmoud Elkady | Cairo | Egypt | 11351 | |
2 | Nesma Mohamed Awaad | Cairo | Egypt | 11351 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
- Study Director: Doaa Elkady phd, lecturer
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 33922