Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework for Management of Maxillectomy Cases: Across Over Study

Sponsor
Mansoura University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06070727
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
2
13
1.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Prosthetic rehabilitation of acquired maxillary defects represents a challenging mission for both the prosthodontist and psychologically traumatized patients. These defects may be due to trauma, pathological conditions, or surgical resection of oral tumors. The resulting main problem is oronasal communication leading to impairment in mastication, swallowing, speech, and facial esthetics

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Obturator
N/A

Detailed Description

Maxillary obturator prostheses are usually fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) if the patient is completely edentulous, or from PMMA and a cast frame-work if partially edentulous. As the size of the surgical resection increases, the weight of the prosthesis also increases. Traditionally, the weight of the prosthesis has been minimized through the use of hollow bulb obturators and change of manufacturing material.

Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has been widely tested in a number of dental applications, such as PEKK dental implants, PEKK obturators, and PEEK RPD frameworks. PEKK has a relatively low Young's modulus of 3 to 4 GPa, which is close to that of human bones, and its tensile properties are similar to those of bone, enamel, and dentin. These properties make it a suitable material for fixed and removable prostheses.(6-8) PEKK is a lightweight material with excellent biocompatibility as it can be used in combination with Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses.(9) So the aim of this study will be, evaluation of Patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of PEKK and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases. The null hypothesis is that, there would be no significant difference between both frameworks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Healthy Related Quality of Life of Polyetherketoneketone and Metal Framework for Management of Maxillectomy Cases: Across Over Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 4, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 4, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 4, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Metal framework group

group A: Patients will receive metallic framework with obturator for 6 months, then the metallic obturator will be replaced by PEKK obturator for another 6 months.

Other: Obturator
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of Polyetherketoneketone(PEKK) and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases.

Other: PEKK framework group

Group B: Patients will receive PEKK obturator for 6 months, then the same patients will receive metallic framework obturator for another 6 months.

Other: Obturator
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and oral healthy related quality of life of Polyetherketoneketone(PEKK) and metal framework for management of maxillectomy cases.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient satisfaction [6 months]

    Obturator functioning scale (OFS) used for evaluation of patient satisfaction, such as improvement in speech, better swallowing with the obturator, feeling and appearance of the upper lip, general feeling in the mouth, self confidence, and avoidance of social family events

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient will be selected according to the following criteria:
  • Patient with unilateral total maxillectomy.

  • Patients will have sufficient number of remaining teeth.

  • Free from any signs of inflammation in defect area.

  • Patient 3 years after receiving radiation.

  • The defect size is small or large.

  • Patient with susceptibility of recurrence.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient is still receiving radiation.

  • Defect result from trauma.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mohammed ELSawy Mansoura Egypt 12345

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mansoura University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06070727
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • M0107023RP
First Posted:
Oct 6, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Oct 6, 2023
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Mansoura University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 6, 2023