ED50 and ED95 of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transthoracic Echocardiography Study

Sponsor
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02780427
Collaborator
(none)
320
1
4
12
26.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The median effective dose (ED50) and ED95 of intranasal dexmedetomidine as a single bolus have not been described for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TEE) study. This information is important to compare agents and to determine the most effective sedative dose. The investigators performed a two-stage study to determine the ED50 and the ED95 of intranasal dexmedetomidine to investigate age-related differences in participants undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: intranasal dexmedetomidine
Phase 4

Detailed Description

The investigators performed a two-stage study to determine the ED50 and the ED95 of intranasal dexmedetomidine in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study. In phase 1, 120 participants were randomized in a Dixon-Massey study to describe the minimum local sedative dose. In phase 2, a further 160 participants were randomly allocated to receive sedation with doses in the upper dose-response range to define the ED95

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
320 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
ED50 and ED95 of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transthoracic Echocardiography Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 1-6 months (Group 1)

Drug: intranasal dexmedetomidine
Phase 1, Children received a bolus of intranasal dexmedetomidine which adjusted by the "Dixon up-and-down method for TEE study. The first child received 2.5 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine dose (100mcg/ml), and the dose varied by 0.1 mcg/kg according to the up-and-down method Phase 2 was a dose-escalation study. After interim analysis of the phase 1 results, four dose levels above the calculated ED50 were defined. Dose spacing was set at 0.25 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine consistent with the re-estimated standard deviation (SD).

Active Comparator: 7-12 months (Group 2)

Drug: intranasal dexmedetomidine
Phase 1, Children received a bolus of intranasal dexmedetomidine which adjusted by the "Dixon up-and-down method for TEE study. The first child received 2.5 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine dose (100mcg/ml), and the dose varied by 0.1 mcg/kg according to the up-and-down method Phase 2 was a dose-escalation study. After interim analysis of the phase 1 results, four dose levels above the calculated ED50 were defined. Dose spacing was set at 0.25 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine consistent with the re-estimated standard deviation (SD).

Active Comparator: 13-18 months (Group 3)

Drug: intranasal dexmedetomidine
Phase 1, Children received a bolus of intranasal dexmedetomidine which adjusted by the "Dixon up-and-down method for TEE study. The first child received 2.5 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine dose (100mcg/ml), and the dose varied by 0.1 mcg/kg according to the up-and-down method Phase 2 was a dose-escalation study. After interim analysis of the phase 1 results, four dose levels above the calculated ED50 were defined. Dose spacing was set at 0.25 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine consistent with the re-estimated standard deviation (SD).

Active Comparator: 19-24 months (Group 4)

Drug: intranasal dexmedetomidine
Phase 1, Children received a bolus of intranasal dexmedetomidine which adjusted by the "Dixon up-and-down method for TEE study. The first child received 2.5 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine dose (100mcg/ml), and the dose varied by 0.1 mcg/kg according to the up-and-down method Phase 2 was a dose-escalation study. After interim analysis of the phase 1 results, four dose levels above the calculated ED50 were defined. Dose spacing was set at 0.25 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine consistent with the re-estimated standard deviation (SD).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The ED50 doses for intranasal dexmedetomidine [up to 0.5 hours after transthoracic echocardiography]

    Phase 1: The starting dose of dexmedetomidine was 2.5 mcg/kg. These doses varied by 0.1 mcg/kg, according to the up-and-down method 18. If the detected MOAA/S score was >3 within 45 minutes after intranasal administration, or clinically adequate diagnostic-quality images could not be acquired, sedation was considered a failure; and the dexmedetomidine dose was increased by 0.1 mcg/kg in the next patient of the same age group. In contrast, if the detected MOAA/S score was ≤3 and the acquisition of clinically adequate diagnostic-quality images was possible, the sedation was considered successful; and the dexmedetomidine dose was decreased by 0.1 mcg/kg in the next patient o

  2. The ED95 doses for intranasal dexmedetomidine [up to 0.5 hours after transthoracic echocardiography]

    Phase 2 was a dose-escalation study. After interim analysis of the phase 1 results, four dose levels above the calculated ED50 were defined. Dose spacing was set at 0.3 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine consistent with the re-estimated standard deviation (SD). Defined levels were set at about 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, and 3.25 mcg/kg of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Criteria for success and failure were identical to those in phase 1. Successful sedation was defined as a MOAA/S score between 0-3 and allowed the acquisition of clinically adequate diagnostic-quality images, while failure was defined as a MOAA/S score >3 within 45 minutes or clinically adequate diagnostic-quality images could not be acquired

  3. Score of physical movement [up to 0.5 hours after transthoracic echocardiography]

    Movement score was recorded by sonographers who were blinded to the sedative regimen. No movement Occasional, slight movement Frequent, slight movement Vigorous movement limited to extremities Vigorous movement, including torso and head

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. sedation induction time [up to 2 hours after drug administration]

    Successful sedation was defined as an MOAA/S of between 0 and 3, and sedation induction time was defined as the time from drug administration to the onset of satisfactory sedation

  2. Wake -up time [up to 2 hours after drug administration]

    Children were classified as awake if the MOAA/S was between 4 and 6. Wake -up time was defined as the time from successful sedation until the time that the child awoke

Other Outcome Measures

  1. heart rate [up to 3 hours after drug administration]

    Bradycardia was defined as a reduction in heart rate more than 20% from the baseline values

  2. Oxyhemoglobin desaturation [up to 3 hours after drug administration]

    Significant Oxyhemoglobin desaturation was defined as < 90%.

  3. non-invasive systolic blood pressure [up to 3 hours after drug administration]

    Hypotension was defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure more than 20% from the baseline values

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
1 Month to 24 Months
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Children, aged between one and 24 months. classified as (American Society of Anesthesiologists) ASA physical status I or II, undergoing TEE were enrolled in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known allergy or hypersensitive reaction to dexmedetomidine

  • Organ dysfunction, and significant developmental delays or behavior problems

  • Cardiac arrhythmia

  • Known. acyanotic congenital heart disease or children after cardiac interventional procedures for follow-up examination.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Anesthesiology of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Guangdong China 510000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Wenhua Zhang, Director, Clinical Resesearch, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02780427
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Wzhang03
First Posted:
May 23, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Aug 2, 2019
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Wenhua Zhang, Director, Clinical Resesearch, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 2, 2019