Cavitation Ultrasound in Treatment of Patients With PCOS
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of the current work was to compare the efficacy of cavitation ultrasound, metformin or combination of both in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) regarding clinical pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, insulin resistance, serum testosterone level, lipid profile.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects 5 to 10% of women of childbearing age and is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility. Common clinical manifestations include menstrual irregularities and signs of androgen excess such as hirsutism, acne, and alopecia. Metformin, a biguanide, is the most widely used drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes worldwide. Its primary action is to inhibit hepatic glucose production, but it also increases the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin. The increase in insulin sensitivity, which contributes to the efficacy of metformin in the treatment of diabetes, has also been shown in non diabetic women with the polycystic ovary syndrome.In women with PCOS, long-term treatment with metformin may increase ovulation, improve menstrual cyclicity, and reduce serum androgen levels; the use of metformin may also improve hirsutism. If published data on the effects of metformin in the prevention of diabetes can be extrapolated to women with the PCOS, then the drug may actually retard progression to glucose intolerance in affected women, as reported in a small, retrospective study. Ultrasonic vibrations spread in the form of a wave in medium such as a liquid or a solid. When the particles of an elastic medium are under ultrasonic vibration, they act continuously in only one direction. The lipolytic range of ultrasounds is 30-70 Kilohertz (KHz), and the best effects are obtained in a range between30-35 KHz. The depth of the treatment in the tissues is generally2-3 cm, to avoid muscles involvement. Biological effects of ultrasounds on adipocytes are: micro-mechanical, thermal, micro-streaming and cavitation. Cavitation ultrasound means that ultrasounds produce an alternation of decompression and compression waves in a fluid media which progressively increase the tension of the adipocyte until it implodes and frees the emulsified fat. The aim of the current work was to compare the efficacy of cavitation ultrasound, metformin or combination of both in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) regarding clinical pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, insulin resistance, serum testosterone level, lipid profile.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cavitation US Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months |
Device: Cavitation US
The areas with localized fat are treated 2 times per week for 3 months using Aesthetic cavitation via ultrasonic cavitation machine (Cavi SMART, South Korea, supplied with one piece cavitation probe of 40 KHz, 3-6 watt(W)/cm^2 adjustable, 60W with 20cm^2 active surface).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Metformin Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily |
Drug: Metformin
Metformin hydrochloride (Glucophage 500 mg/tablet, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, USA). Medication is initiated in a step-up fashion every 5 days, from one tablet per day to three. This dose is maintained as tolerated throughout the 3 months of the study.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cavitation US + metformin Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Other: Cavitation US + Metformin
Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin. the treatment duration lasts 3 months
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Pregnancy Rate [9 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Ovulation Rate as Determined by Ultrasonographic Folliculometry and Luteal Serum Progesterone Assay. [3 months]
The Number of participants who had evidence of successful ovulation during the 3 months. Ovulation was diagnosed based on ultrasonographic folliculometry and/or luteal serum progesterone assay.Every month, folliculometry was done to count the number of antral follicles (AFC), follow follicular growth, measure dominant follicle diameter and detect occurrence of ovulation. a mid-luteal serum progesterone assay was done to confirm ovulation. Ultrasound was performed serially till reaching preovulatory follicle(s of around 20 mm in diameter that then rupture to show a collapsed follicle in the same location with internal echoes consistent with its transformation to a corpus luteum. Progesterone assay was done using immulite 2000 apparatus chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Mid-luteal phase progesterone above 6 ng/mL was considered indicative of normal corpus. luteum function.
- Change in Insulin Resistance [Baseline and 3 months]
Change in Fasting insulin concentration
- Change in Serum Free Testosterone Level [Baseline and 3 months]
Change in serum free testosterone levels
- Change in Lipid Profile [Baseline and 3 months]
Change in LDL levels was taken as the indicator of change in lipid profile
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Obese infertile polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Women 40 years or older
-
Women using fertility treatments, oral contraceptives or other confounding medications during the last 3 months
-
Smokers or with history of general diseases like cardiovascular, liver, kidney or respiratory disease, diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or malignancy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ain shams university | Cairo | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ain Shams University
Investigators
- Study Director: Mostafa I. Ibrahem, M.D., Ain Shams University
- Study Chair: Mohamed I. Ellaithy, MD, Lecturer Obstetics & Gynecology Ain shams university faculty of medicine
- Principal Investigator: Ahmed K. Makled, MD, Assistant professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology Ain shams university faculty of medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ASU6-2011
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | 252 women were assessed for eligibility 54 women were excluded Not meeting inclusion criteria (n=38) Declined to participate (n=9) Other reasons (n=7) |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 66 | 66 | 66 |
COMPLETED | 66 | 66 | 66 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 | 198 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
25.7
(4.5)
|
26.1
(4.1)
|
26.3
(5.2)
|
26
(4.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
66
100%
|
66
100%
|
66
100%
|
198
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (Number) [Number] | ||||
Egypt |
66
100%
|
66
100%
|
66
100%
|
198
100%
|
Duration of infertility (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
3.3
(1.5)
|
3.4
(1.3)
|
3.2
(1.3)
|
3.3
(1.4)
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
37.9
(4.9)
|
36.7
(4.2)
|
36.1
(5.2)
|
36.9
(4.7)
|
Androgenic alopecia (Number) [Number] | ||||
Yes |
12
18.2%
|
9
13.6%
|
6
9.1%
|
27
13.6%
|
No |
54
81.8%
|
57
86.4%
|
60
90.9%
|
171
86.4%
|
Acne (Number) [Number] | ||||
Yes |
18
27.3%
|
23
34.8%
|
26
39.4%
|
67
33.8%
|
No |
48
72.7%
|
43
65.2%
|
40
60.6%
|
131
66.2%
|
Seborrheic dermatitis (Number) [Number] | ||||
Yes |
26
39.4%
|
34
51.5%
|
39
59.1%
|
99
50%
|
No |
40
60.6%
|
32
48.5%
|
27
40.9%
|
99
50%
|
Menstrual pattern (Number) [Number] | ||||
Amenorrhea |
43
65.2%
|
47
71.2%
|
51
77.3%
|
141
71.2%
|
Oligomenorrhea |
23
34.8%
|
19
28.8%
|
15
22.7%
|
57
28.8%
|
Systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters of mercury (mmHg)] |
122.4
(10.1)
|
121.9
(12.4)
|
121.8
(12.3)
|
122
(11.6)
|
Diastolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters of mercury (mmHg)] |
80.5
(8.2)
|
81.6
(7.1)
|
82.9
(7.8)
|
81.7
(7.6)
|
Serum Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) (mIU/ml) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mIU/ml] |
6.1
(1.9)
|
5.8
(2.2)
|
6.6
(2.3)
|
6.2
(2.1)
|
Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (mIU/ml) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mIU/ml] |
10.9
(1.1)
|
10.7
(1.1)
|
11.1
(1.8)
|
10.9
(1.3)
|
LH/FSH ratio (Ratio) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Ratio] |
1.79
(0.7)
|
1.85
(0.6)
|
1.68
(0.6)
|
1.77
(0.6)
|
Total testosterone (ng/ml) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [ng/ml] |
0.84
(0.05)
|
0.83
(0.04)
|
0.83
(0.04)
|
0.83
(0.04)
|
Free testosterone (pg/ml) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [pg/ml] |
3.9
(2.07)
|
3.8
(1.32)
|
3.7
(1.72)
|
3.8
(1.71)
|
Fasting insulin (µIU/ml) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [µIU/ml] |
12.9
(6.4)
|
12.5
(5.3)
|
11.8
(4.1)
|
12.4
(5.1)
|
Fasting glucose (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl] |
83.1
(21.4)
|
79.4
(22.7)
|
77.8
(22.1)
|
80.1
(22.3)
|
Fasting Glucose/Insulin Ratio (GIR) (mg/mIU) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/mIU] |
6.44
(0.8)
|
6.35
(0.7)
|
6.59
(0.7)
|
6.46
(0.7)
|
Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (HOMA score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [HOMA score] |
2.65
(1.01)
|
2.45
(1.06)
|
2.27
(0.99)
|
2.46
(1.01)
|
Quantitative Insulin sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) (Index) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Index] |
0.33
(0.03)
|
0.33
(0.04)
|
0.34
(0.04)
|
0.33
(0.04)
|
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl] |
282.3
(32)
|
273.4
(29.2)
|
276.8
(30.5)
|
277.2
(30.7)
|
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl] |
129.7
(19.3)
|
127.1
(20.4)
|
122.6
(19.1)
|
126.5
(19.6)
|
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl] |
80.9
(11.2)
|
77.8
(9.9)
|
82.1
(10.8)
|
80.4
(10.6)
|
Triglycerides (TGs) (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl] |
204.9
(28.1)
|
199.6
(22.4)
|
208.4
(26.8)
|
204.3
(25.7)
|
Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) (Ratio) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Ratio] |
0.88
(0.7)
|
0.89
(0.7)
|
0.91
(0.8)
|
0.89
(0.7)
|
Total body fat percent (Percentage) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Percentage] |
43.2
(5.6)
|
44.9
(6.2)
|
45.6
(5.7)
|
44.6
(5.8)
|
Body fat mass (Kilograms (kg)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kilograms (kg)] |
37.7
(10.4)
|
39.8
(11.2)
|
41.1
(10.1)
|
39.5
(10.5)
|
Fat free mass (Kilograms (kg)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kilograms (kg)] |
50.8
(9.5)
|
51.2
(9.1)
|
51.2
(10.2)
|
51.1
(9.6)
|
Abdominal fat mass (Kilograms (kg)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kilograms (kg)] |
6.8
(2.8)
|
6.9
(3.2)
|
7.1
(2.2)
|
6.9
(2.6)
|
Emotion mean score (PCOSQ Emotion Score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [PCOSQ Emotion Score] |
4.3
(1.4)
|
4.9
(1.6)
|
4.7
(1.7)
|
4.6
(1.6)
|
Body hair mean score (PCOSQ Body hair Score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [PCOSQ Body hair Score] |
3.4
(1.7)
|
3.3
(1.9)
|
3.7
(1.6)
|
3.5
(1.7)
|
Weight mean score (PCOSQ Weight Score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [PCOSQ Weight Score] |
2.6
(1.4)
|
2.4
(1.3)
|
2.1
(1.5)
|
2.4
(1.4)
|
Menstrual problems mean score (PCOSQ Menstrual problems Score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [PCOSQ Menstrual problems Score] |
3.6
(1.1)
|
3.7
(1.1)
|
3.9
(1.1)
|
3.7
(1.1)
|
Infertility mean score (PCOSQ Infertility Score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [PCOSQ Infertility Score] |
3.7
(1.02)
|
3.6
(0.9)
|
3.4
(1.1)
|
3.6
(1)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Clinical Pregnancy Rate |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 9 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Measure Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Number [participants] |
12
18.2%
|
5
7.6%
|
16
24.2%
|
Title | Ovulation Rate as Determined by Ultrasonographic Folliculometry and Luteal Serum Progesterone Assay. |
---|---|
Description | The Number of participants who had evidence of successful ovulation during the 3 months. Ovulation was diagnosed based on ultrasonographic folliculometry and/or luteal serum progesterone assay.Every month, folliculometry was done to count the number of antral follicles (AFC), follow follicular growth, measure dominant follicle diameter and detect occurrence of ovulation. a mid-luteal serum progesterone assay was done to confirm ovulation. Ultrasound was performed serially till reaching preovulatory follicle(s of around 20 mm in diameter that then rupture to show a collapsed follicle in the same location with internal echoes consistent with its transformation to a corpus luteum. Progesterone assay was done using immulite 2000 apparatus chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Mid-luteal phase progesterone above 6 ng/mL was considered indicative of normal corpus. luteum function. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Measure Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Number [participants] |
39
59.1%
|
16
24.2%
|
45
68.2%
|
Title | Change in Insulin Resistance |
---|---|
Description | Change in Fasting insulin concentration |
Time Frame | Baseline and 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Measure Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [uIU/ml] |
-2.4
|
-1.1
|
-3.4
|
Title | Change in Serum Free Testosterone Level |
---|---|
Description | Change in serum free testosterone levels |
Time Frame | Baseline and 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Measure Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [pg/ml] |
-0.4
|
-0.2
|
-0.6
|
Title | Change in Lipid Profile |
---|---|
Description | Change in LDL levels was taken as the indicator of change in lipid profile |
Time Frame | Baseline and 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin |
Measure Participants | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [mg/dl] |
-10.2
|
-8.9
|
-20.9
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 3 months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin | |||
Arm/Group Description | Cavitation ultrasound was done using ultrasonic cavitation machine 2 times per week for 3 months | Metformin oral tablets 500 mg were given three times daily for 3 months | Combination of both Cavitation US + Metformin | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/66 (0%) | 0/66 (0%) | 0/66 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Cavitation US | Metformin | Cavitation US + Metformin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 9/66 (13.6%) | 15/66 (22.7%) | 19/66 (28.8%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Gastrointestinal upset | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 11/66 (16.7%) | 34 | 9/66 (13.6%) | 31 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Generalized malaise | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 4/66 (6.1%) | 19 | 3/66 (4.5%) | 17 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||
Localized reaction | 9/66 (13.6%) | 19 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 7/66 (10.6%) | 23 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Moustafa Ibrahim |
---|---|
Organization | Assistant professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ain-shams faculty of medicine |
Phone | 00201001955996 |
mi_monem@yahoo.com |
- ASU6-2011