Effects of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation on Pain and Neural Excitability

Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05852067
Collaborator
(none)
25
1
2
14
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Numerous studies have confirmed the analgesic effect of M1-rTMS on both induced pain and various chronic pains and subsequently found that pcTBS is more time-efficient and can produce the same or even stronger analgesic effect, however, its study in pathological pain h has not been thoroughly investigated. Due to the dynamic nature of the injury sensory system, pain also exhibits a dynamic process, but there is a lack of specific methods or biomarkers to document this process. Surface electromyography (EMG) is a common technique used in rTMS studies to reflect changes in cortical excitability. In turn, both pain and rTMS interventions can cause changes and thus can be used as a potential biomarker to predict pain onset and progression. In addition, the number of sessions of rTMS treatment is an important factor influencing the analgesic effect of rTMS. In summary, this study intends to explore the best pain predictor by using a capsaicin-induced pain model in healthy volunteers, monitor the dynamic changes of cortical excitability index and VAS score before and after pcTBS intervention, and also verify the relationship between the number of pcTBS treatments and analgesic effect, to provide a new strategy for the prevention and treatment of neuropathic pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: pcTBS of M1
  • Device: SHAM stimulation
N/A

Detailed Description

This study was a prospective, single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover-design trial. Each subject was randomized to receive 3 sessions of rTMS intervention, consisting of 2 consecutive pcTBS stimulations and 1 sham stimulation, with no less than 3 days between each session. The pain was induced by applying capsaicin to the dorsum t of the right hand and recording electromyographic (EMG) signals with surface electrodes on the right first interosseous muscle. Subjects received M1- pcTBS or sham stimulation (Sham) intervention at 40 minutes of capsaicin application (T40). Subjects' cortical excitability was measured at 5-minute intervals at baseline, 40 minutes after capsaicin application and pcTBS intervention, and pain perception was assessed at 10-minute intervals (each assessment to be performed at the end of the measurement).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
25 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School od Medicine
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Active stimulation of M1

pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.

Device: pcTBS of M1
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

Sham Comparator: SHAM stimulation

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal

Device: SHAM stimulation
The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. change of pain intensity [through study completion, an average of 6 months]

    pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at baseline and posttreatment of pcTBS stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) [through study completion, an average of 6 months]

    Corticospinal excitability was measured with MEP at rest of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward)

  2. Cortical silent period (CSP) [through study completion, an average of 6 months]

    Corticospinal excitability will be measured with CSP during a sustained voluntary FDI muscle contraction, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward)

  3. pain intensity after two sessions of pcTBS [through study completion, an average of 6 months]

    pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) after two sessions of pcTBS

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. 18-65 years of age; 2) physical and mental health, free of chronic pain (through interviews and McGill questionnaires); 3) Right-handed
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. inability to receive TMS interventions (e.g. pacemaker); 2) mental illness or suicidal tendencies; 3) history of previous seizures/epilepsy; 4) previous craniocerebral surgery for stroke or other reasons; 5) drug/substance dependence; 6) Inability to sit upright to cooperate with assessment and treatment; 7) Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within half a year

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou Hangzhou China

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: min yan, prof., The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05852067
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2023-0276
First Posted:
May 10, 2023
Last Update Posted:
May 10, 2023
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 10, 2023