Brain Stimulation and Hand Training in Children With Hemiparesis

Sponsor
University of Minnesota (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02250092
Collaborator
Cerebral Palsy International Research Foundation (Other), Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc. (Industry), National Institutes of Health (NIH) (NIH)
20
2
2
30.3
10
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hemiparetic cerebral palsy influences motor function in children during development and throughout their lifetime. The deficits one sees are the result both of the congenitally induced brain lesion and the subsequent plasticity that can impair function of the surviving neurons in the damaged brain.

Many current treatments have limited influence on children's neurorecovery. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) involving constraining the unaffected limb to encourage use of the affected limb has shown promise, yet with new technology revealing the potential to directly influence the brain, there is an urgent need to study the synergy of combined techniques.

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as a direct neuromodulatory intervention has the potential to act synergistically with CIMT to influence neurorecovery.

Combining behavioral therapies, constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), with a novel form of neuromodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we investigated the influence of this intervention on improved motor outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. The study hypotheses surround the safety, feasibility and efficacy of combined CIMT and tDCS wherein those children who receive the combined intervention will reveal no major adverse events, yet improved hand function and cortical excitability.

To Note: In addition to the combination of NIBS with CIMT, we also investigated the combination of NIBS with another form of motor intervention, bimanual, or two-handed, training. During bimanual training, children engage both hands in movements. The goal of bimanual training is to teach children how to most effectively use their hands cooperatively. During bimanual training, children play with games and toys that require the use of both hands. Children also practice activities of daily living that require the use of both hands, such as putting hair in a ponytail, tying shoes, and buttoning clothing. N=8 for this pilot study and no randomization. (Burke Medical Research Institute partnered with Columbia University and did a parallel pilot study. N=8 (PIs Friel and Gordon; Protocol BRC449)

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
  • Device: Placebo Comparator
N/A

Detailed Description

We use single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure the location and strength of brain connections that control hand movements.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Synergistic Effect of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Hemiparesis
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 31, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 28, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 10, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: tDCS/CIMT

Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT.

Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions
Other Names:
  • tDCS
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Placebo Comparator: tDCS sham/CIMT

    Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT.

    Device: Placebo Comparator

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) [2 weeks, 6 months]

      Participants were videotaped while performing a bimanual age-appropriate activity. Investigators scored this performance using the Assessment of Assisting Hand (AHA) inventory. The AHA consists of 22 items, each scored on a 4-point scale. Raw scores are a sum of the 22 item scores, ranging from 22-88. Computer software logarithmically transforms ordinal raw scores into a final score. Final scores are reported on a logit-based AHA-unit scale and range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater ability. Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to 2 weeks and change from baseline to 6 months.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) [2 weeks, 6 months]

      The COPM is clinician-administered semi-structured interview measuring the participant's perception of satisfaction and performance of personally set goals. There are 3 categories (Self-Care, Productivity, and Leisure) each containing 3 subcategories each for a total of 9 items, which are rated on an ordinal scale from 1 (minimum importance) to 10 (maximum importance). Each of the child's goals are given a satisfaction and performance rating. The average of the satisfaction ratings across all goals is reported as the "average satisfaction score", ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to 2 weeks and change from baseline to 6 months.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Subject Symptom Assessment (SSA) From 2 Weeks to 6 Months [2 weeks, 6 months]

      The Subject Symptom Assessment (SSA) is a questionnaire of common side effects reported in the literature that is asked of the child undergoing non-invasive brain stimulation. This measure asks the child to rate if the symptom is present (yes or no) and if it is present, rate the severity using a 1 to 4 scale (1 indicates absent, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). Lower values are better as they represent absent or mild symptoms. Outcome is reported as the change in symptom severity from 2 weeks of treatment to 6 months of treatment. This measure is not collected at baseline.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    8 Years to 21 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Hemispheric Stroke or Periventricular Leukomalacia confirmed by most recent MRI or CT radiologic report with resultant congenital hemiparesis

    2. ≥ 10 degrees of active motion at the metacarpophalangeal joint

    3. Receptive language function to follow two-step commands as evidenced by performance on TOKEN test of intelligence

    4. No evidence of seizure activity within the last 2 years

    5. Presence of a motor evoked potential from at least the contralesional hemisphere if not both hemispheres

    6. Ages 8-21 years

    7. Able to give informed assent along with the informed consent of the legal guardian

    8. Children who have had surgeries, which may influence motor function eg- tendon transfer, will be included, yet surgical history will be documented and included in any publication within a participant characteristics table.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Metabolic Disorders

    2. Neoplasm

    3. Epilepsy

    4. Disorders of Cellular Migration and Proliferation

    5. Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury

    6. Pregnancy

    7. Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices

    8. Evidence of skin disease or skin abnormalities

    9. Botulinum toxin or Phenol block within [six-months] preceding the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
    2 Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare Saint Paul Minnesota United States 55101

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Minnesota
    • Cerebral Palsy International Research Foundation
    • Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.
    • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Bernadette T Gillick, PhD, MSPT, PT, University of Minnesota

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    University of Minnesota
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02250092
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1408M53169
    First Posted:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 18, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2020
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by University of Minnesota
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 10 10
    COMPLETED 10 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT Total
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 10 10 20
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    10
    100%
    8
    80%
    18
    90%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    0
    0%
    2
    20%
    2
    10%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Age (years) [Median (Standard Deviation) ]
    Median (Standard Deviation) [years]
    12.33
    (3.08)
    13.17
    (5.08)
    12.7
    (4.17)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    5
    50%
    6
    60%
    11
    55%
    Male
    5
    50%
    4
    40%
    9
    45%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Asian
    0
    0%
    10
    100%
    10
    50%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    White
    8
    80%
    0
    0%
    8
    40%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    2
    20%
    0
    0%
    2
    10%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    10
    100%
    10
    100%
    20
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
    Description Participants were videotaped while performing a bimanual age-appropriate activity. Investigators scored this performance using the Assessment of Assisting Hand (AHA) inventory. The AHA consists of 22 items, each scored on a 4-point scale. Raw scores are a sum of the 22 item scores, ranging from 22-88. Computer software logarithmically transforms ordinal raw scores into a final score. Final scores are reported on a logit-based AHA-unit scale and range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater ability. Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to 2 weeks and change from baseline to 6 months.
    Time Frame 2 weeks, 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator
    Measure Participants 10 10
    2 weeks
    6.4
    8
    6 months
    5.5
    7.6
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM)
    Description The COPM is clinician-administered semi-structured interview measuring the participant's perception of satisfaction and performance of personally set goals. There are 3 categories (Self-Care, Productivity, and Leisure) each containing 3 subcategories each for a total of 9 items, which are rated on an ordinal scale from 1 (minimum importance) to 10 (maximum importance). Each of the child's goals are given a satisfaction and performance rating. The average of the satisfaction ratings across all goals is reported as the "average satisfaction score", ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to 2 weeks and change from baseline to 6 months.
    Time Frame 2 weeks, 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator
    Measure Participants 10 10
    2 weeks
    2.14
    1.8
    6 months
    2.94
    3.22
    3. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Change in Subject Symptom Assessment (SSA) From 2 Weeks to 6 Months
    Description The Subject Symptom Assessment (SSA) is a questionnaire of common side effects reported in the literature that is asked of the child undergoing non-invasive brain stimulation. This measure asks the child to rate if the symptom is present (yes or no) and if it is present, rate the severity using a 1 to 4 scale (1 indicates absent, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). Lower values are better as they represent absent or mild symptoms. Outcome is reported as the change in symptom severity from 2 weeks of treatment to 6 months of treatment. This measure is not collected at baseline.
    Time Frame 2 weeks, 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    1.7
    1.76

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 6 months
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Arm/Group Description Intervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): 10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions Placebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT. Placebo Comparator
    All Cause Mortality
    tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    tDCS/CIMT tDCS Sham/CIMT
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 10/10 (100%) 10/10 (100%)
    General disorders
    Headache 4/10 (40%) 9 1/10 (10%) 1
    Unusual Feelings on the Skin of the Head 2/10 (20%) 5 1/10 (10%) 1
    Itchiness 1/10 (10%) 5 3/10 (30%) 6
    Unusual Feelings or Emotions 1/10 (10%) 2 0/10 (0%) 0
    Dizziness 0/10 (0%) 0 3/10 (30%) 3
    Nausea 0/10 (0%) 0 1/10 (10%) 1
    Tingling 2/10 (20%) 10 2/10 (20%) 2
    Difficulty Paying Attention 0/10 (0%) 0 1/10 (10%) 1

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Bernadette Gillick
    Organization University of Minnesota
    Phone 612-626-6415
    Email gillick@umn.edu
    Responsible Party:
    University of Minnesota
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02250092
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1408M53169
    First Posted:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 18, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2020