Near-Continuous, Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric Transport
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial compared the clinical outcomes of transported pediatric patients monitored with an oscillometric blood pressure device versus those monitored with a near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
94 transported patients were randomized to a control arm, monitored with a standard oscillometric blood pressure device (Dinamap), or an experimental arm, monitored with a near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure device (Vasotrac).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring Patients received continuous blood pressure monitoring the entire time they were in med flight to the hospital. |
Device: Continuous blood pressure monitoring using (Dinamap) standard oscillometric blood pressure device
Continuous blood pressure monitoring of patients during med flight to hospital
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard of care blood pressure monitoring Patients received the normal standard of care for blood pressure monitoring during the course of the med flight to the hospital. |
Device: Standard of care blood pressure monitoring
Patients received the standard of care for blood pressure monitoring while en route to the hospital via med flight.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The Difference in Hospital Length of Stay Between Those Who Received Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring and Those Who Received Standard of Care [Up to two weeks]
This is the total number of participants analyzed for the intervention group and the total number of participants analyzed for the control group and the total number of days that each group was analyzed overall.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay [Up to two weeks]
- Total Number of Organ Failure Days (Multiple Organ Dysfunction) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)for the Control Group and Total Number of Organ Failure Days for the Intervention Group. Multiple Organ Dysfunction is Defined as Multiple Organ Failure. [Up to two weeks]
Total number of organ failure days is for each group as a whole.
- Mean Daily Score Using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) Scale. [Up to two weeks]
The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) is an illness severity score for the ICU. The TISS score can range from zero up to 78. The higher the score is, the more severe the illness. The TISS-28 scale measures the severity of a patient's illness.
- Amount of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation [At start of inter-facility transport, then every 15 minutes until arrival.]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Pediatric patients transported by Angel One to Arkansas Children's Hospital.
-
Age Group: 1 year - 17 years AND
-
Patients at risk of developing SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), according to the criteria below.
- The presence of at least two of the following four criteria (one of which must be abnormal temperature or leukocyte count): A. Core temperature of >38.5 C or <36 C. B. Tachycardia, defined as mean heart rate >95th percentile for age in absence of external stimulus, chronic drugs, or painful stimuli.
- Mean respiratory rate >95th percentile for age, or >10% immature neutrophils.
OR
- Patients with moderate or severe head trauma, at risk of developing secondary ischemic brain injury, according to the criteria below.
- Glasgow Coma scale <15 with one or more of the following: A. Mass lesion or cerebral edema on CT or MRI scan. B. Post-Traumatic Seizure. C. Multiple Trauma. D. Focal Neurologic Signs. E. Intubation for control of suspected intracranial hypertension.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Wrist circumference less than 11cm (minimum size for the Vasotrac device).
-
Contractures of the wrists, not allowing correct placement of the Vasotrac device.
-
Hematoma(s) located on both wrists from recent redial (<24hr) artery puncture.
-
Patients likely to proceed to brain death per assessment of the referring physician.
-
Patients being treated for malignant hypertension.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Arkansas Children's Hospital | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | 72205 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Arkansas
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Stroud, MD, University of Arkansas
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 48082
- CUMG Grant
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Pediatric interfacility helicopter transport patients between May 2006 and June 2007. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 48 | 46 |
COMPLETED | 48 | 46 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 48 | 46 | 94 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
48
100%
|
46
100%
|
94
100%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
8.5
(5.6)
|
6.5
(4.6)
|
7.5
(5.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
20
41.7%
|
16
34.8%
|
36
38.3%
|
Male |
28
58.3%
|
30
65.2%
|
58
61.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
48
100%
|
46
100%
|
94
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | The Difference in Hospital Length of Stay Between Those Who Received Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring and Those Who Received Standard of Care |
---|---|
Description | This is the total number of participants analyzed for the intervention group and the total number of participants analyzed for the control group and the total number of days that each group was analyzed overall. |
Time Frame | Up to two weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to Treat |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring |
Measure Participants | 48 | 46 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days] |
10.0
(13.8)
|
5.4
(4.6)
|
Title | Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Up to two weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring |
Measure Participants | 48 | 46 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days] |
3.7
(4.5)
|
2.8
(4.8)
|
Title | Total Number of Organ Failure Days (Multiple Organ Dysfunction) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)for the Control Group and Total Number of Organ Failure Days for the Intervention Group. Multiple Organ Dysfunction is Defined as Multiple Organ Failure. |
---|---|
Description | Total number of organ failure days is for each group as a whole. |
Time Frame | Up to two weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT |
Arm/Group Title | Intervention Group | Control Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 46 | 48 |
Measure Days | 206 | 202 |
Number [Days] |
18
|
32
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control Group, Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.03 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Mean Daily Score Using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) Scale. |
---|---|
Description | The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) is an illness severity score for the ICU. The TISS score can range from zero up to 78. The higher the score is, the more severe the illness. The TISS-28 scale measures the severity of a patient's illness. |
Time Frame | Up to two weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This is the total number of participants analyzed for the intervention group and the control group and the total number of days analyzed overall for the intervention group and the control group. |
Arm/Group Title | Intervention Group | Control Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 46 | 48 |
Measure Days | 206 | 202 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
22.4
(10.1)
|
23.9
(10.1)
|
Title | Amount of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | At start of inter-facility transport, then every 15 minutes until arrival. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring |
Measure Participants | 48 | 46 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [ml/kg] |
19.8
(22.2)
|
9.9
(9.9)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Control Group | Intervention Group | ||
Arm/Group Description | Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring | Near Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/48 (0%) | 0/46 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Control Group | Intervention Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/48 (0%) | 0/46 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Michael Stroud |
---|---|
Organization | University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences |
Phone | 501-364-1861 |
StroudMichaelH@uams.edu |
- 48082
- CUMG Grant