Effects of Muscle Energy Techniques Versus Core Stability Exercises in Pelvic Girdle Pain

Sponsor
Riphah International University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05787158
Collaborator
(none)
57
1
2
10.9
5.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

PGP is referred to as a specific form of LBP which occurs isolatedly as well as in combination with lumbar back pain. PGP localized to the anterior or posterior pelvis, most commonly located between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal folds especially around the SI joint. Pelvic girdle pain radiated to the posterior thigh

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Muscle energy techniques
N/A

Detailed Description

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is known to be a musculoskeletal disorders which affects the pelvic bone. PGP is referred to as a specific form of LBP which occurs isolatedly as well as in combination with lumbar back pain. PGP localized to the anterior or posterior pelvis, most commonly located between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal folds especially around the SI joint. Pelvic girdle pain radiated to the posterior thigh. Moreover, it can also cause pain in the symphysis (1). Compared to lower back pain, PGP is substantially more painful and linked with functional limitations as standing, walking, sitting and changing positions are less tolerable in such patients (2). PGP is musculoskeletal in nature and is not caused by gynecological or urological conditions (3). Despite the fact that the cause of PGP is unknown, it is considered that it occurs due to many reasons such as trauma, arthritis, anatomical fault or it can be associated with pregnancy (4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
57 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effects of Muscle Energy Techniques Versus Core Stability Exercises in Pelvic Girdle Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 2, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group A

Group A: 20 patients were included in this group. This studygroup was assigned with basic treatment protocol with 15 minutes of TENS and thermal therapy for 10 minutes followed by muscle energy technique (Post facilitation stretching exercises). The intervention was given three days per weekfor six weeks. Each total session lasted for 45minutes. METs were applied for the weakened muscles.

Other: Muscle energy techniques
Group A: 20 patients were included in this group. This studygroup was assigned with basic treatment protocol with 15 minutes of TENS and thermal therapy for 10 minutes followed by muscle energy technique (Post facilitation stretching exercises). The intervention was given three days per weekfor six weeks. Each total session lasted for 45minutes. METs were applied for the weakened muscles. (21). Group B: 20 Patients of this group were given core stability exercises by the female physical therapist in three different levels. Each level continued for a duration of two weeks in which the patients were trained for the exercises. The patients were provided sessions thrice per week with 2 sets of 10 repetitions and a hold of 10 second after TENS for 15 minutes and thermal therapy for 10 minutes
Other Names:
  • core stability exercises
  • Active Comparator: Group B

    Group B: 20 Patients of this group were given core stability exercises by the female physical therapist in three different levels. Each level continued for a duration of two weeks in which the patients were trained for the exercises. The patients were provided sessions thrice per week with 2 sets of 10 repetitions and a hold of 10 second after TENS for 15 minutes and thermal therapy for 10 minutes.

    Other: Muscle energy techniques
    Group A: 20 patients were included in this group. This studygroup was assigned with basic treatment protocol with 15 minutes of TENS and thermal therapy for 10 minutes followed by muscle energy technique (Post facilitation stretching exercises). The intervention was given three days per weekfor six weeks. Each total session lasted for 45minutes. METs were applied for the weakened muscles. (21). Group B: 20 Patients of this group were given core stability exercises by the female physical therapist in three different levels. Each level continued for a duration of two weeks in which the patients were trained for the exercises. The patients were provided sessions thrice per week with 2 sets of 10 repetitions and a hold of 10 second after TENS for 15 minutes and thermal therapy for 10 minutes
    Other Names:
  • core stability exercises
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE [12 weeks]

      Visual Analogue scale is a numeric scale ranging from 1 to 10. These ranges show the intensity of pain where 1 shows no pain and 10 shows worst pain imaginations. It is a very reliable and valid tool with test-retest reliability of r = 0.96 and validity correlations of 0.86 to 0.95.

    2. OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX [12 weeks]

      Oswestry Disability Index was calculated in order to find out the disability among patients. ODI evaluates disability related to Activities of Daily Living. This is considered to be the best tool for evaluating low back issues. It encompasses 10 questions with each question scoring five. Questions related to pain, personal care, walking, standing, lifting, sitting, sex life, sleeping, social life and travelling are included. The interpretation shows minimal disability if the patient score is 0-20%, moderate disability if the score is 20-40%, 40 - 60% severe disability, 60 - 80% crippled and 80 - 100 % depicting that the patient is either bed bound or overly expressing the symptoms

    3. SF - 36 [12 weeks]

      This questionnaire is used to assess the functional performance in different domains of life like physical, body pain, mental, social and psychological. The questionnaire encompasses questions based on 7 domains of life. The minimum score of SF-36 is 0 which means that the functional performance is worst whereas the highest score is 100 which means that functional performance is best

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    25 Years to 35 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Females of 25 to 40 years were included in this study.(20)

    • Female patients who gave birth at least 6 months before.(20)

    • Females who gave birth through vaginal delivery.(20)

    • Females with at least three positive pain provocative tests such as posterior pelvic pain provocation test (P4), active straight leg raise test (ASLR), thigh thrust, Patrick's Faber test, Gaenslen's test and distraction test.(20)

    • History of pain around the pelvic girdle, lower back or between the posterior iliac crest and the gluteal fold, difficulty in walking and/or pain when putting weight on one leg

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Females who suffered from grade 3 or 4 vaginal tears during their pregnancy (20)

    • Females who underwent episiotomy during delivery (20)

    • Females who delivered through caesarean section (20)

    • Postpartum females with a history of trauma to the pelvic region (20)

    • Postpartum females with a history of pelvic surgery

    • Postpartum females with a history of other orthopedic disorders

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital. Lahore Punjab Pakistan 05499

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Riphah International University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Sobia Kanwal, tDpt, Riphah IU

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Riphah International University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05787158
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • REC/RCR & AHS/22/0546
    First Posted:
    Mar 28, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 28, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 28, 2023