Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.

Sponsor
Riphah International University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04818411
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
11.3
3.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this research is to compare the efficacy of stabilization exercise versus pelvic girdle pain thrust manipulation technique in females with postpartum pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises
  • Other: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation
N/A

Detailed Description

Pelvic-girdle pain is a mechanical disorder growing rapidly as a consequence of changing delivery pattern and changing lifestyle. Medication with synthetic drugs not only has been unable to effectively curtail the spread of this disease conditions but also is most of the times linked with co-occurring side-effects. The exercise and manual therapy-based approach could lead in reducing the functional limitations and morbidity rate in females with the postpartum pain. This research could also help in spreading the awareness globally, to Prenatal and Postnatal Hospital Caregivers.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 18, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 27, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 26, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises

Stabilization exercises

Other: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises
The program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors. Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles. After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period. The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks.

Experimental: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation

High-velocity thrust manipulation

Other: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation
: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used. For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted. The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side. The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt. If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later. If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual analog scale [2 months]

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

  2. Oswestry disability index [2 months]

    The ODI score (index) is calculated as: If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated: If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • • Post-partum females with the normal vaginal delivery present with pelvic girdle pain before the next conception.

  • Aged between 18 and 45

  • Posterior pelvic girdle pain located distal and/or lateral to the L5-S1

  • Pain onset during pregnancy or within 3 weeks after delivery, most recent delivery within 6 to 16 weeks

  • Positive posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients presenting with the history of:

  • Back pain indicating radiculopathy

  • Mechanical back pain

  • Back pain due to disc herniation

  • Rheumatological diseases

  • Neurological illness or recent surgery

  • Women who have gone through C-section

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Riphah Rehabilitation Center Lahore Punjab Pakistan 54000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Riphah International University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maryam Shabbir, PhD*, Riphah International University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Riphah International University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04818411
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB-UOL-FAHS/659 Anam Naz
First Posted:
Mar 26, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Apr 14, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 14, 2021