Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Head to Head comparison of perioperative complications and secondary the impact of operation techniques with or without mesh on patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
During the last decade a substantial progress in the detailed knowledge of morphology and function of different compartments of the female pelvic floor was achieved. The obtained informations were quickly implemented in the clinical practice especially in the application of special meshes and of novel techniques of their implantation. Their success rate was evaluated only in pilot companies supported studies. We do miss randomised studies not sponsored by company comparing different surgical techniques and their impact on the quality of life (QoL); the objective estimation of those consequences is for the longlasting effect of the surgery inevitable. The new methods bring also new complications which were not yet relevantly and objectively documented.
In the study we compare the techniques contemporary used - in the groups with or without mesh, in size relevant for the statistical evaluation
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: A Patients with 3 compartment pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy, treated with Amreich-Richter procedure; it will be set randomly |
Procedure: Vaginal fixation Amreich-Richter
Descending vaginal cuff will be treated with fixation of the cuff on sacrospinous ligament
|
Active Comparator: B Patients with 3 compartment pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy, treated with total Prolift procedure; it will be set randomly |
Procedure: Prolift total
Descending vaginal cuff will be treated with insertion of site-specific mesh into the vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal space
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The objective evaluation o perioperative complications and comparison of patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated with Amreich-Richter procedure or Prolift implants. [3 month]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Ultrasound, urodynamics, clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, validated QoL questionnaires [1 year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
female sex
-
age 18 and more
-
subscribed informed consent
-
objective symptoms of prolapse-POP-Q 3 and more according to ICS standards
-
compliance of the patient
Exclusion Criteria:
-
patients with evidence of malignant lesion in small pelvis
-
history of radiotherapy in small pelvis
-
patients suffering from any form of PID within inclusion process
-
pregnancy
-
lactation
-
total eversion of uterus and vagina
-
serious internal disorders
-
history of recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula
-
history of rejection of any artificial material
-
symptoms of primary genuine stress urinary incontinence
-
patients who were not able to subscribe the informed consent
-
patients, who couldnĀ“t be reached for further follow-up
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dpt. Obstetrics and gynecology, General Teaching Hospital | Prague | Czech Republic | 12800 | |
2 | Institute for the care of mother and child | Prague | Czech Republic | 147 10 | |
3 | Dpt. of gynecology, Central military hospital | Prague | Czech Republic | 169 02 | |
4 | Dpt. Obstetrics and gynecology, Teaching hospital Bulovka | Prague | Czech Republic | 18000 | |
5 | Dpt. of Obstetrics and gynecology, Bata hospital | Zlin | Czech Republic | 762 75 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Charles University, Czech Republic
- Ministry of Health, Czech Republic
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Halaska, MD,PhD, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- NR/9309-3 IGA
- NR/9309-3 IGA