Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure

Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00572702
Collaborator
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic (Other)
200
5
2
35
40
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Head to Head comparison of perioperative complications and secondary the impact of operation techniques with or without mesh on patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Vaginal fixation Amreich-Richter
  • Procedure: Prolift total
N/A

Detailed Description

During the last decade a substantial progress in the detailed knowledge of morphology and function of different compartments of the female pelvic floor was achieved. The obtained informations were quickly implemented in the clinical practice especially in the application of special meshes and of novel techniques of their implantation. Their success rate was evaluated only in pilot companies supported studies. We do miss randomised studies not sponsored by company comparing different surgical techniques and their impact on the quality of life (QoL); the objective estimation of those consequences is for the longlasting effect of the surgery inevitable. The new methods bring also new complications which were not yet relevantly and objectively documented.

In the study we compare the techniques contemporary used - in the groups with or without mesh, in size relevant for the statistical evaluation

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Open, Randomized, Prospective, Comparative, Multicentric to Treat Prolapse of Vaginal Cuff After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2007
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2009
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: A

Patients with 3 compartment pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy, treated with Amreich-Richter procedure; it will be set randomly

Procedure: Vaginal fixation Amreich-Richter
Descending vaginal cuff will be treated with fixation of the cuff on sacrospinous ligament

Active Comparator: B

Patients with 3 compartment pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy, treated with total Prolift procedure; it will be set randomly

Procedure: Prolift total
Descending vaginal cuff will be treated with insertion of site-specific mesh into the vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal space
Other Names:
  • Prolift total - polypropylen mesh
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The objective evaluation o perioperative complications and comparison of patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated with Amreich-Richter procedure or Prolift implants. [3 month]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Ultrasound, urodynamics, clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, validated QoL questionnaires [1 year]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • female sex

    • age 18 and more

    • subscribed informed consent

    • objective symptoms of prolapse-POP-Q 3 and more according to ICS standards

    • compliance of the patient

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • patients with evidence of malignant lesion in small pelvis

    • history of radiotherapy in small pelvis

    • patients suffering from any form of PID within inclusion process

    • pregnancy

    • lactation

    • total eversion of uterus and vagina

    • serious internal disorders

    • history of recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula

    • history of rejection of any artificial material

    • symptoms of primary genuine stress urinary incontinence

    • patients who were not able to subscribe the informed consent

    • patients, who couldnĀ“t be reached for further follow-up

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Dpt. Obstetrics and gynecology, General Teaching Hospital Prague Czech Republic 12800
    2 Institute for the care of mother and child Prague Czech Republic 147 10
    3 Dpt. of gynecology, Central military hospital Prague Czech Republic 169 02
    4 Dpt. Obstetrics and gynecology, Teaching hospital Bulovka Prague Czech Republic 18000
    5 Dpt. of Obstetrics and gynecology, Bata hospital Zlin Czech Republic 762 75

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Charles University, Czech Republic
    • Ministry of Health, Czech Republic

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Michael Halaska, MD,PhD, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00572702
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NR/9309-3 IGA
    • NR/9309-3 IGA
    First Posted:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2009

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 3, 2009