Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Plus Mini-Sling Versus Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Alone
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators have performed colposacropexy in women with uterovaginal prolapse for many years with satisfactory results.
This study was designed to compare whether, in the treatment of patients with uro-genital prolapse and urinary incontinence, the addition of a contemporary anti-incontinence procedure such as mini-sling is associated with a reduction of post-operative urinary incontinence (correction of pre-existent urinary incontinence and prevention of masked urinary incontinence).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: POP repair plus mini-sling Patients affected by urogenital prolapse and urinary incontinence, who are candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy, will receive sacropexy plus anti-incontinence procedure (mini-sling). |
Procedure: POP repair plus mini-sling
For POP, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum.
A mini sling system will be used, placing a urethral low-tension tape anchored to the obturator muscles bilaterally at the level of tendinous arc. This mini-sling is a polypropylene monofilament mesh.
|
Active Comparator: pelvic organ prolapse repair Patients affected by urogenital prolapsed and urinary incontinence, who are candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy, will receive sacropexy alone. |
Procedure: POP repair
For POP repair, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum. The peritoneum is closed over the meshes.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- urinary incontinence [12 months]
long-term relief of symptoms with anatomic correction of prolapse and subjective/objective correction of urinary incontinence
Secondary Outcome Measures
- peri and post-operative complications [1 month]
Operative time and morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients affected by III-IV grade urogenital urogenital prolapsed and urinary incontinence
-
Candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy
-
Prospectively randomized, using a predetermined computer-generated randomization code (4 blocks), to sacropexy plus anti-incontinence procedure (mini-sling) or sacropexy alone
Exclusion Criteria:
-
fertile patients
-
contraindication to major surgery
-
uterine cancer
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Urology Dept. University of Perugia | Perugia | Italy | 06100 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University Of Perugia
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M. Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
- Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M. Pelvic organ prolapse repair with and without prophylactic concomitant Burch colposuspension in continent women: a randomized, controlled trial with 8-year followup. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.078. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
- Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Zucchi A, Bini V, Mearini L, Porena M. Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1342-7. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
- Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, Hilton P, Nilsson CG, Waltregny D. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):218-38. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Apr 23. Review.
- UPerugia-1