EmsellaPain: Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the Emsella Chair therapy to Sham and to determine whether electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Currently there are no other studies utilizing the Emsella Chair for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Eligible subjects will receive 2 treatments per week for a total of 4 weeks.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and often debilitating in both men and women. It occurs below the umbilicus and is severe enough to cause functional impairment or require treatment. The health care burden of CPP is substantial. First line treatments involve a multidisciplinary approach and include general relaxation and stress management, patient education, self-care and behavioral modification, and pain management. Second-line agents include physical therapy (avoiding kegel exercises), and oral and intravesical agents. More invasive options including neuromodulation.
The Emsella chair is currently approved as a treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Chronic pelvic pain patients may benefit from treatment. The Emsella chair generates electromagnetic stimulation which is able to penetrate deep into the pelvic floor muscles inducing stimulation and providing rehabilitation for weak pelvic floor muscles. The Emsella chair is a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology for the treatment of SUI, in addition to other pelvic floor related discorders. HIFEM technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercises over 28 minutes.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Emsella Chair Active Treatment Subjects will be asked to sit on the device and the height will be adjusted until the subject's feet are on the floor. The active treatments are individualized, since some subjects will be more sensitive than others. The Emsella Chair will be turned on and the setting gradually increased to the subject's sensory threshold; the maximum sensation the subject can tolerate. The setting will be decreased slightly and stay unchanged for the remainder of the treatment. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%. |
Device: BTL Emsella chair
Subjects will sit on the device. The RNC will turn the device on and increase the setting gradually until the patient reaches their sensory threshold. This is the maximum sensation the patient can tolerate. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
|
| Sham Comparator: Emsella Sham Treatment Sham treatment subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner. The sham treatment will provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below the therapeutic level (<10% power). |
Device: BTL Emsella chair
Subjects will sit on the device. The RNC will turn the device on and increase the setting gradually until the patient reaches their sensory threshold. This is the maximum sensation the patient can tolerate. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair to sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported pain and discomfort as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study]
Mean change in Pain VAS from baseline to end of treatment will be compared between the Emsella Chair group and the sham group. VAS is scored from 0-10. 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Severity scale (PGI-S). [4 weeks after completing primary endpoint visit, week 12]
Change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Severity scale (PGI-S). The subject will check the box that describes how their condition is now. The available options are normal, mild, moderate, or severe.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I) [4 weeks after completing primary endpoint visit, week 12]
Change in subject-reported impression of CPP improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). The subject will select one of the following, (very much better, much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, much worse) to describe their chronic pelvic pain symptoms now versus prior to study treatment.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity as measured by subject-reported pelvic floor tenderness to palpation during 4 quadrant pelvic examination as measured by VAS. [4 weeks after completing primary endpoint visit, week 12]
A trained provider will complete a pelvic (women) or rectal (men) exam on subjects. The VAS is a validated questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. The subject will provide a pain score from 0 - 10 for each of the 4 quadrants assessed.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity in females. [4 weeks after completing primary endpoint visit, week 12]
The change in CPP severity as measured by subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire (FSFI) for female subjects. The FSFI is a 19 question survey. A lower score is equivalent to a higher degree of sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 95.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impression of CPP severity in males [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit; week 12]
The change in CPP severity as measured by subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory questionnaire (BSFI) for male subjects. The BSFI is a validated questionnaire for male sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 44. A lower score indicates a higher degree of dysfunction.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported depression severity as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit; visit 12]
The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory. It is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression such as hopelessness, irritability, guilt, fatigue, weight loss, and lack of interest in sex. Subjects that score greater than 30 at any time may be referred for psychological evaluation but may continue study participation. A higher score indicates a greater severity of depression.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported bother related to overactive bladder symptoms as measured by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-Q). [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit; week 12]
Since both overactive bladder (OAB) and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) share urinary urgency and frequency symptoms, this validated measure will evaluate additional aspects associated with OAB and IC/BPS. The OAB-q SF consists of two scales assessing symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with OAB. Each question is rated on a 6 point scale with 1 = Not at all and 6 = A very great deal
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported urinary and pain symptoms, as well as bother, as measured by the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index (ICSI-PI). [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit, week 12]
IC/BPS patients can share urinary urgency and frequency symptoms. The ICSP-PI measures urinary and pain symptoms and assesses how problematic are. A higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. Scores range from 0-36.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit, week 12]
The GAD-7 questionnaire is a 7-item validated scale to assess generalized anxiety disorder. Patients are grouped by GAD score 0-7 and 8+ which suggests no anxiety disorder and probably anxiety disorder, respectively.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported pain as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). [4 weeks after completing the primary endpoint visit, week 12]
The McGill Pain Questionnaire can be used to evaluate a person experiencing pain over time to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. The questionnaire consists of 22 questions. Each question is scored 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible). A higher score indicates more severe pain symptoms.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported rumination, magnification, and helplessness related to pain as measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). [4 weeks after primary endpoint; week 12]
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) lists thirteen statements describing different thoughts and feelings that may be associated with pain. Each statement is rated as: 0 =not at all, 1= to a slight degree, 2= to a moderate degree, 3= to a great degree, and 4= all the time. Subjects who report a larger number associated with such thoughts during pain are more likely to rate the pain as more intense.
- Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported perception of overall improvement in symptoms as measured by Global Response Assessments (GRA) for Pain and Quality of Life. [4 weeks after primary endpoint; week 12]
The GRA is a 7-point scale to evaluate the subject's perception of overall improvement in symptoms. It is scored as follows: markedly worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, same (unchanged), slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved.
- The secondary durability objective for this study is to determine whether subjects in the Emsella Chair group continue to have decrease in pain, as measured by VAS, compared to the Sham group 4 weeks after the primary efficacy endpoint. [Treatment durability will be assessed 4 weeks after the primary endpoint; week 12 of the study]
Change in subject reported pain and discomfort as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale from 0= no pain to 10= worst possible pain.
- The secondary safety objectives of this study are to determine the safety and tolerability of Emsella Chair compared to sham. Safety and tolerability will be assessed in relation to the incidence of adverse events. [4 weeks after the primary endpoint visit, week 12]
Safety and tolerability of the Emsella chair compared to Sham will be assessed in relation to the incidence of adverse events reported.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated, informed consent prior to screening, and be likely to comply with study protocol, including independently complete study questionnaires and communicate with study personnel about AEs and other clinically important information.
-
Females and males, 18 to 80 years of age, at screening
-
Self-reported CPP defined as pelvic pain that is non-cyclical and of at least 6 months duration and refractory to other treatments
-
Subject agrees not to start any new treatment for CPP (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods.
-
Subject agrees to maintain a stable dose all current medications throughout the treatment and follow-up period
For Females Only:
- If of child-bearing age and female, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral contraceptives, condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, IUD, implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s))
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pelvic floor physical therapy, including muscle training and/or electrostimulation, in a clinical setting within 30 days prior to screening.
-
Pelvic floor trigger point injections, pudendal nerve block, or bladder hydrodistention within 30 days prior to screening
-
Subject weighs more than 330 pounds
-
Current UTI. If a subject has a confirmed symptomatic UTI at screening, per the investigator's clinical judgment, they will be deferred from screening until treatment is completed, and may resume once symptoms have resolved.
-
Pulmonary insufficiency, defined as difficulty breathing and fatigue, especially during exercise; heartbeat (palpitations); swelling of the legs or feet; dizziness or fainting; and/or bluish discoloration of the nails and/or lips (cyanosis)
-
Subject has a malignant tumor, in any location on the body.
-
Any condition that causes a lack of normal skin sensation to the pelvis, buttocks, and lower extremities
-
History of Hunner's lesion in the medical record
-
Major metal implants such as: metal plates, screws, joint replacements, implanted cardiac pacemakers, drug pumps, neurostimulators, electronic implants, copper intrauterine devices, defibrillators, and metal implants in the pelvic area. Patients with other metal implants will be evaluated by the investigator for inclusion in the study.
-
Subject has a piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment
-
Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously
-
Currently participating in an investigational study that may impact study results or previously received an investigational drug or treatment within 30 days of the Screening Visit
-
Current or history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation
For Females Only:
- Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, at screening or anytime throughout the study period
Note: For the sake of preserving scientific integrity, one or more of the eligibility criteria have been left off the list posted while the trial is ongoing. A full list of eligibility criteria will be posted upon completion of the trial.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak | Royal Oak | Michigan | United States | 48073 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- William Beaumont Hospitals
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kenneth Peters, MD, Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2019-348