TIMPEG: Additional Benefit of Thoracic Impedance Monitoring (TIM) for Propofol-sedation Monitoring During PEG Placement

Sponsor
Georg Dultz (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT04202029
Collaborator
(none)
172
1
2
30.9
5.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The present study is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded study. A total of 172 patients presenting for percoutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) under sedation will be included according to the statistical sample size calculation. Patients will be randomized to either group 1- standard monitoring (pulseoxymetry and non-invasive blood preassure monitoring) or group 2- standard monitoring and thoracic impedance measurement during Propofol-based sedation for PEG. Episodes of Hypoxia are documented and compared in both groups.

Statistical analysis will be done in cooperation with the statistical biomedical institute oft he university hospital in Frankfurt.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: thoracic impedance monitoring
  • Device: pulseoxymetry
  • Device: non-invasive blood preassure monitoring
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
172 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The participants will be randomely assigend by a computer based algorithm to either the standard monitoring group as defined by the German S3 guidline "Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie" containing pulsoxymetry and non-invasive blood preassure monitoring versus the standard and additionally the thoracic impedance monitoring using an extra ECGThe participants will be randomely assigend by a computer based algorithm to either the standard monitoring group as defined by the German S3 guidline "Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie" containing pulsoxymetry and non-invasive blood preassure monitoring versus the standard and additionally the thoracic impedance monitoring using an extra ECG
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Additional Benefit of Thoracic Impedance Monitoring (TIM) for Propofol-sedation Monitoring by Non- Anesthesiologist During Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG), a Prospective, Randomized-controlled Clinical Study.
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 4, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: pulseoxymetry arm

pulseoxymetry arm: standard monitoring: pulseoxymetry and non-invasive blood preassure monitoring

Device: pulseoxymetry
Pulseoxymetry is meassuring the heart rate and the oxygen saturation in the arterial blood

Device: non-invasive blood preassure monitoring
Non-invasive blood preassure is a method using a blood preassure cuff to identify the blood preassure.

Experimental: thoracic impedance monitoring arm

thoracic impedance monitoring arm: standard monitoring and additionally thoracic impedance measurement)

Device: thoracic impedance monitoring
Thoracic impedance measurement identifies the respiratory frequence using the changes of impedance during inspiration and expiration via an ECG.

Device: pulseoxymetry
Pulseoxymetry is meassuring the heart rate and the oxygen saturation in the arterial blood

Device: non-invasive blood preassure monitoring
Non-invasive blood preassure is a method using a blood preassure cuff to identify the blood preassure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. comparison of hypoxia in both arms [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    Hypoxia is defined as oxygen saturation dropping below 90 % for more than 15 seconds. The primary end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Comparison of hypoxia-episodes in both arms [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    Number of hypoxia-episodes during each intervention. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.

  2. Comparison of severe hypoxia episodes in both arms defined as oxygen saturation dropping below 85 % [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    Severe hypoxia is defined as O2 saturation below 85%. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedatio n until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.

  3. Comparison of severe hypoxia-episodes in both arms [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.]

    The number of hypoxia-episodes during each intervention will be assesed. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.

  4. Comparison of the time difference of occuring apnoe before hypoxia [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    The time difference between the onset of apnoe befpre the onset of hypoxia will be meassured.

  5. Specifity and sensetivity of thoracic impedance monitoring [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    The specifity and sensitivity will be calculated using the frequency of falls alarms and missed alarms in relation to hypoxia. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by awaking of the patient.

  6. Additional cost of thoracic impedance monitoring (TIM) [Time frame is the entire study period with a maximum of 3 years.]

    The costs that are needed to implement TIM during every procedure will be calculated and will be stated in the results. All PEG-placements in the TIM group will be used. By using a 3-lead-ECG, 3 electrodes will be needed per patient. For alle patients, one ECG-cable will be needed. Therefore, the costs will be calculated per patient.

  7. Risk stratification of baseline criteria for hypoxia [Time frame is the entire study period with a maximum of 3 years.]

    Risk factors will be evaluated in an univariate and a multivariate analyse

  8. Comparison of intervention procedures to prevent hypoxia [Average duration period of PEG-placement: approx. 15 minutes.]

    The necessity to prevent a hypoxic event because of an alarm by the monitoring by elevating the oxygen delivery, using jaw thrust manoeuvre or mask ventilation will be compared in both arms. This end point is assessed from the beginning of propofol sedation until the PEG-procedure is terminated defined by the awaking of the patient.

  9. Comparison of satisfaction of doctors in both arms [approx. 15 minutes]

    The involved doctors will be asked to give there opinion using visual analog scale (VAS). Scale reaches from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (satisfied). The end point will be meassured after the procedure. The investigation time is defined as one PEG-placement.

  10. Comparison of satisfaction of nurses in both arms [approx. 15 minutes]

    The involved nurses will be asked to give there opinion using visual analog scale (VAS). Scale reaches from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (satisfied). The end point will be meassured after the procedure. The investigation time is defined as one PEG-placement.

  11. Comparison of satisfaction of patients in both arms [approx. 15 minutes]

    The involved patients will be asked to give there opinion using visual analog scale (VAS). Scale reaches from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (satisfied). The end point will be meassured after the procedure. The investigation time is defined as one PEG-placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • /= 18 years

  • given consent

  • planned PEG

Exclusion Criteria:
  • ASA >/= 4

  • no given consent

  • pregnant/laction

  • contraindication against PEG

  • contraindication against propofol-sedatation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Germany 60590

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Georg Dultz

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Georg Dultz, Clinical Professor, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04202029
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FRA-UNI-TIM-PEG-TRIAL-2019
First Posted:
Dec 17, 2019
Last Update Posted:
May 22, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Georg Dultz, Clinical Professor, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 22, 2020