Clincosm LogoSign in Get a demo

Peri-implantitis and MMP-8

Sponsor
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05711407
Collaborator
(none)
100
Enrollment
23
Anticipated Duration (Months)

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Peri-implantitis is defined as the pathological condition around dental implants characterized by inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa and progressive bone loss, eventually leading to implant loss. Peri-implantitis is thought to be a disease analogous to periodontitis with a prevalence reaching 22%. Though peri-implantitis is readily recognized as a part of modern dentistry, the exact etiology or an effective treatment regimen hasn't been established yet. Thus, contemporary research is orientating toward acknowledging the aetiologic and risk factors of the disease and of course establishing prognostic markers for disease prevention. Microbiota residing in the subgingival plaque are considered the main etiologic factor of the disease, however, current literature has not concluded on the exact microbial composition of peri-implant lesions. In addition, genetic predisposition has been recognized as a risk factor for disease initiation and progression and several observational studies have addressed the potential association between various gene polymorphisms and the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Lastly, to establish effective preventive measures, several biomarkers have been evaluated as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers of disease progression.

Objectives:

  1. To identify the relationship of peri-implantitis with Cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) and MMP-8 gene polymorphisms. Cyclooxygenase catalyzes the production of prostaglandins (PGs) which are an important inflammatory mediator participating in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis. In addition, PGE2 expression in the peri-implant crevicular fluid will be assessed.

  2. To characterize the microbiota associated with peri-implantitis lesions, using novel identification techniques enabling the identification of specific opportunistic bacteria associated with the disease.

  3. To test the diagnostic accuracy of a modern chairside test, using metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), an enzyme implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease, as a biomarker of disease progression.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Genetic: Gene Polymorphisms of MMP-8

Detailed Description

Dental implants have become an integrated part of modern dentistry during the last decades. Since osseointegration (the process of an implant being incorporated into the jawbone) was discovered, implant dentistry has gone substantial steps over time. Dental implants comprise of an endosteal part made of titanium and an external prosthetic part, aiding in the rehabilitation of edentulous patients. They offer the possibility to patients missing one or several teeth to achieve the maximum functional and esthetic results, refraining from traditional dentures that are quite unpleasant. Implant industry is gradually growing. Overall, the global market of dental implants was valued at US$ 2,91 billion in 2016 with more than 8.809 million implants placed annually in the US (1). However, the prevalence of biological complications regarding dental implant supported restorations is growing in the same rate (1).

The term "Peri-implantitis" was introduced in the 1st European Workshop of Periodontology in 1994 and since then numerous definitions have been proposed to describe the bone loss that characterizes the aftermath of implant installation (2,3). Peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis are covered under the term peri-implant diseases and are considered analogous to periodontal diseases (4). Currently, peri-implantitis is defined as the pathological condition around dental implants characterized by inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa and progressive bone loss, eventually jeopardizing the fate of the implant (5). The number of studies referring to peri-implantitis have risen in the last 30 years according to PubMed, from 86 papers in the 90s' to a total of 1938 manuscripts until now (1). The prevalence of peri-implantitis is also exhibiting growing rates. In a systematic review, Zitzman and Berglundh in 2008 reported a prevalence ranging from 12 to 56% (3). More recent studies reveal a prevalence of 22% (1-47%) (6), 20% (7), 26% (8), and 28% (9). It should be pointed that in the previous studies the exact prevalence of the disease is difficult to estimate and is dependent on several factors including the diagnostic criteria of the disease and the time point chosen for the evaluation (10). However, it is obvious that peri-implantitis is a growing problem affecting implant dentistry and will certainly be the topic of many future studies.

Several protocols have been proposed for the treatment of peri-implantitis including, non-surgical protocols, with implant decontaminating devices and lasers and surgical protocols such as the use of regenerative materials (11,12) . However, if peri-implantitis is already established, the proposed strategies and recommendations for its treatment can still be considered as empirical. From the existing evidence it seems that nonsurgical therapy is not effective, at least not in advanced cases. Surgical techniques may be necessary to provide us with adequate access to degranulate the inflamed tissues effectively as well as to decontaminate the implant surface (13).

The Consensus report of Workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions concluded that peri-implantitis is an inflammatory process of a microbial origin that causes bone loss (4). In addition, several risk factors have been proposed as potential co-drivers in this entity, including history of periodontitis, smoking, diabetes and poor plaque control (5). Factors such as genetic predisposition and release of titanium particles have also been indicated as potential risk factors (14). The microbial involvement in peri-implantitis initiation and progression has been established, however recent studies suggest that peri-implantitis may be a result of a foreign body reaction, emphasizing the role of the host response in the disease initiation. (15). In other words, the aetiology of the disease is yet to be elucidated. However, using conventional DNA probe and cultural analyses, common periodontopathogenic bacteria have been isolated at both healthy and diseased implant sites (16) and the distribution of the detected species did not markedly differ by clinical implant status (17). However, when compared with healthy implant sites alone, peri-implantitis was associated with higher counts of bacterial species considered as consensus periodontal pathogens including Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia (18). Moreover, observational studies have indicated that peri-implantitis was more frequently linked with opportunistic pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus ,(19,20) fungal organisms (e.g. Candida albicans, Candida boidinii, Penicillum spp., Rhadotorula laryngis, Paelicomyces spp.),(21,22) and viruses (i.e. human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus), (23) thus pointing to a rather complex and heterogenous infection. Therefore, the recognition of the exact bacterial composition of peri-implant lesions is of paramount importance.

A significant observation about implant failures is that usually, a small number of patients lose many implants. This clusterization phenomenon has been identified in many studies (24,25). Weyant and his colleagues examined the survival rate of implants in 598 patients and noticed that more than half of the cases that received multiple implants had more than one failure. They estimated that patients who had one implant lost were 1.3 more likely to lose more implants (26). These findings led to the hypothesis that host factors affect implant survival and therefore genetic predisposition may play an important role in the development of peri-implantitis. Many gene polymorphisms have been evaluated. Initially, most of the studies referred to polymorphisms of cytokines which play a key role in the immune response (27-29), such as the interleukins IL-1α, IL-1β, and their antagonist protein IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and Transforming Growth Factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Apart from these, various other genes have been investigated, e.g. genes encoding CD14, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), microRNAs, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), TRAF family member-associated NF-kappa-β activator (TANK), serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF), calcitonin receptor (CTR), haptoglobin. There are many discrepancies in the results of the above-mentioned studies. Some succeeded to detect possible associations and others not. A more novel gene polymorphism mentioned in genetic studies is that of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). A single nucleotide polymorphism of COX-2 has been shown to alter the expression of the COX-2 gene. Several studies have found an association among COX-2 gene polymorphisms and periodontitis (30-32). However, in the case of peri-implantitis data is scarce.

The diagnosis of peri-implantitis is based on traditional clinical indices, similar to assessment of periodontal disease. In specific, the diagnosis is established by the presence of bleeding and/or suppuration on gentle probing, increased probing depth compared to previous clinical examinations and the presence of bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial bone remodeling (4). However, recent studies question the diagnostic accuracy of clinical indices as such, supporting that the diagnosis of the disease is far more complex (33). In these regards, novel diagnostic methods have been utilized in order to achieve an early and proper diagnosis of the disease (34). A biomarker, or biological marker is a measurable indicator of some biological state or condition. Biomarkers are often measured and evaluated to examine normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention, and are useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of a disease. In the case of peri-implantitis several biological molecules have been evaluated as potential biomarkers aiding the diagnosis of the disease. Molecules such as TNF-a, IL-1, RANKL have been associated with peri-implantitis in a variety of studies (34). Lately, matrix metalloproteinase 8, (MMP-8),especially in its active form (aMMP-8) has gained much attention of becoming promising biomarker candidate for diagnosing and assessing the progression and course of these episodic oral inflammatory tissue destructive and degenerative diseases (35,36).

Taken all together, peri-implantitis is a complicated disease with a high prevalence among the population. In addition, current data on the etiology and diagnosis of the disease is controversial.

PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES, STATE OF THE ART AND CHALLENGES

  1. To address the relationship of peri-implantitis with COX-2 gene polymorphisms, as there are no similar studies in the literature.

  2. To identify the pathogenic microbiota that is associated with the disease using novel bacterial identification methods.

  3. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an aMMP-8 Point-of-care chair-side test in peri-implantitis.

The rationale in studying each of the studied objectives will be analyzed in a separate section.

  • COX-2 gene polymorphisms. The genetic predisposition is considered a potential risk factor for peri-implantitis as already mentioned. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is single nucleotide variation at a specific position of the genome. Each variation appears in some appreciable degree within a population. SNPs may occur within coding and non-coding sequences of genes, or in the intergenic regions. Considering degeneracy of the genetic code, SNP within a coding sequence may change the amino acid sequence of the coding polypeptide (nonsynonymous SNP), or not affect the protein sequence (synonymous SNP). SNPs outside protein-coding regions may still regulate gene expression through affecting the transcription factor binding, gene splicing, mRNA degradation, or the sequence of noncoding RNA. Therefore, SNPs underlie differences in our susceptibility to disease. SNPs of inflammatory cytokine genes may affect their expression levels or amino acid sequence and, consequently, the host inflammatory response.

COX-2 converts arachidonic acid into prostaglandin H2, which is the precursor of prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandin E2, which mediates proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory reactions in many tissues (37), is also partly responsible for the activating processes involved in resorption of the alveolar bone during the pathogenesis of periodontitis. Associations of the cyclooxygenase 2(COX-2) gene with periodontitis were first identified in Taiwanese and Chinese case-control populations (30,31) and subsequently validated in a northwest European population. Studies as such involving the COX-2 gene have not been conducted in the case of peri-implantitis yet. However, recent gene expression studied have revealed an increased activity of the COX-2 pathway in the case of peri-implantitis (38,39), implying that COX-2 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis. The association of peri-implantitis with certain gene polymorphisms will allow for a better understanding of the disease, leading to more effective preventing and treatment strategies.

  • Microbial factors associated with peri-implantitis Current data confirm that peri-implant infections are dominated by Gram negative bacteria, similar to periodontal infections, but some cases may harbor a distinct microbiota (20,40,41). Although early reports showed similarities between the peri-implant and periodontal flora, later studies demonstrated that peri-implantitis lesions may present not only consensus periodontal pathogens but also opportunistic microorganisms, such as S.aureus, S. anaerobius, Escherichia coli, Candida and Streptococci spp (18). Furthermore, sequencing methods have also revealed other non-cultivable microorganisms associated with peri-implant disease. Asaccharolytic anaerobic gram-positive rods (AAGPR) such as Eubacterium nodatum, Eubacterium brachy, Slackia exigua, Gemella sanguinis and anaerobic Gram-negative rods (OGNR) like Mitsuokella sp., Treponema lecithinolyticum have been identified (42). The discrepancies among these studies may arise from the different methods used for microbiological sampling and processing (43). The microbiological profile of peri-implant diseases remains an issue of interest and many investigations and reviews have been conducted in order to conclude whether the microbiota is different from that of periodontitis; however, controversies still exist. The latest of the studies conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the distinct microbiota between peri-implant and periodontal diseases (44,45) whereas others state that they may be different entities in terms of microbiological profile (43). Therefore, further studies need to be conducted, in order to define the microbiological profile of peri-implant tissues. Newest technologies, such as shotgun sequencing of the whole genome of bacteria involved in peri-implantitis would be very useful for this purpose, but no such research has been published up to now. Thus, in this study Next Generation Sequencing will be used will be utilized in order to identify the most purulent microbiota associated with the disease. 16s rRNA sequencing will enable the characterization of the whole taxonomic identity of the peri-implant lesions.

  • Diagnostic accuracy of ImplantSafe MMP-8 Biomarker Test. Neutrophil collagenase, also called matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte collagenase, or collagenase-2, has been identified and characterized as a major collagenolytic enzyme that causes active periodontal and peri-implant degeneration (APD) in periodontitis and peri-implantitis (46,47). MMP-8 can resolve and regulate inflammatory and immunological cascades by processing nonmatrix bioactive substrates such as chemokines, cytokines, serpins, and complement components. Physiological levels of MMP-8 can exert protective and defensive anti-inflammatory characteristics (48). Increased levels of especially active MMP-8 (aMMP-8), but not the latent, inactive proform, have been found in periodontitis- and peri-implantitis-affected oral fluids (saliva, mouth rinse, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF)) (49). A key characteristic of active periodontal and peri-implant diseases is the sustained pathological elevation and activation of aMMP-8 in periodontal and peri-implant tissues, which are reflected in oral fluids (50). Consequently, aMMP-8 is a promising biomarker candidate for diagnosing and assessing the progression and course of these episodic oral inflammatory tissue destructive and degenerative diseases (46). More importantly, aMMP-8 in oral fluids can also serve as a predictive and preventive adjunctive biotechnological tool to indicate (49,50) preventive interventions (secondary prevention or supportive periodontal/peri-implant therapy (51,52) and to inhibit or reduce the conversion of gingivitis and mucositis to periodontitis and peri-implantitis, respectively.

Recently, lateral-flow point-of-care (PoC)/chair-side tests (PerioSafe and ImplantSafe), discovered in Finland and further developed in Germany (53), have been developed based on earlier described technologies and monoclonal antibodies (53,54). The tests, PerioSafe and ImplantSafe, and reader (ORALyser) have been developed and manufactured by Medix Biochemica Ltd (Espoo, Finland) and Dentognostics GmbH (Jena, Germany) and are commercially available from Dentognostics GmbH (Jena, Germany). In fact, the PoC/chair-side aMMP-8 lateral-flow immunotests resemble the classical pregnancy and/or recently described HIV-PoC tests (55). The aMMP-8 oral fluid tests can be used according to the manufacturer's instructions (47). PerioSafe measures and analyses the levels of aMMP-8 in mouth rinse and ImplantSafe in PISF and GCF; thus, PerioSafe is patient-specific and ImplantSafe is site-specific (47,53). PerioSafe and ImplantSafe test-sticks can be quantitated by the ORALyser reader in 5 min PoC/chair-side. PerioSafe and ImplantSafe with ORALyser quantitation are reliable, quantitative, noninvasive, safe, and inexpensive adjunctive point-of-care diagnostic tools for diagnosis, screening, monitoring, and prevention of periodontal and peri-implant diseases (47). A pilot case-control peri-implantitis study shows both 100% sensitivity and specificity for ImplantSafe test (56).

Methodology and Implementation:

To achieve the previous aims a case control study has been designed and will be carried on in the department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Dental School, Aristotle university of Thessaloniki.

A study sample of minimum 100 patients attending the Postgraduate Clinic of Periodontology and Implant Biology of Dental School Aristotle University of Thessaloniki for periodontal or peri-implant treatment, will be recruited. Patients should be diagnosed with peri-implantitis according the latest (2017)(4) criteria. The study protocol will be applied to the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki for approval and all patients will be asked to sign their inform consent.

  • Work Packages: i. COX-2 gene polymorphisms: Buccal swab will be obtained from all the patients included in the study. After DNA extraction, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process will be performed in order to identify the proposed polymorphisms, using commercial primers specific for the gene. The gene polymorphism analyses, and relevant laboratory process will be carried out with the collaboration of the school of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. More specifically, the samples will be collected from Ioannis Fragkioudakis (Postgraduate student of the Department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Department of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) and will be stored in -80°C until further processing. The samples will be analyzed in cooperation with the department of Biology, Aristotle university of Thessaloniki under supervision of Professor Minas Arsenakis. The process will be carried out by Ioannis Fragkioudakis and the PhD candidate Symela Koutounidou. The selection of this collaborating organism is based on the previous experience of Professor Minas Arsenakis in gene polymorphisms analysis and the fully equipped laboratory located in the department of Biology AUTh. In addition, the PI, declares successful previous collaborations with the members of the selected organization.

  1. Pathogenic Microbiota Samples will be obtained from the selected implants by the insertion of sterile endodontic paper points into each peri-implant crevice. More specifically, the samples will be collected from Ioannis Fragkioudakis (Postgraduate student of the Department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Department of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) and will be stored in -80°C until further processing The samples will be analyzed using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). More specifically ,16S rRNA sequencing and HOMINGS will be used to identify the whole microbiota included in the samples, enabling the characterization of all the taxonomic levels of bacteria. The NGS will be conducted in collaboration with the department of microbiology, Medical School, A.U.Th. The choice of the collaborating organism and members is based on the availability on the needed laboratory equipment (Access provides by the associated professor Lemonia Skoura) in the AHEPA university general Hospital of Thessaloniki. In addition, the needed laboratory work will be conducted by Fani Chatzopoulou (PhD Student), familiar with the processes, under the supervision of the Associate Professor Dimitrios Chatzidimitriou.

  2. MMP-8 Analysis ImplantSafe rapid aMMP8 analysis tests will be used for the evaluation of the MMP-8 levels in the selected implants. The process will be as follows: Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 (neutrophil collagenase-2) levels in its active form (aMMP-8) will be collected from the Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid, with the aid of the paper strips included in the test. Afterwards the samples will be analyzed quantitatively by the digital reader ORALyzer® according to the manusfacturer's instructions giving an instant quantification of the aMMP-8 levels. The ORALyzer has been in the possession of the Department of Periodontology since 2019. All the samples will be collected and analyzed by Ioannis Fragkioudakis.1. Shibli JA. Peri-implantitis as a " burden " disease. 2019;33:1-2.

  1. Tallarico M, Canullo L, Wang H-L, Cochran D, Meloni S. Classification Systems for Peri-implantitis: A Narrative Review with a Proposal of a New Evidence-Based Etiology Codification. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):871-9.

  2. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(SUPPL. 8):286-91.

  3. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(February):S286-91.

  4. Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(June 2016):S246-66.

  5. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S158-71.

  6. Rokn A, Aslroosta H, Akbari S, Najafi H, Zayeri F, Hashemi K. Prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients not participating in well-designed supportive periodontal treatments: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Mar;28(3):314-9.

  7. Daubert DM, Weinstein BF, Bordin S, Leroux BG, Flemmig TF. Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Peri-Implant Disease and Implant Failure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. J

Periodontol [Internet]. 2015 Mar 1;86(3):337-47. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140438 9. Schuldt Filho G, Dalago HR, Oliveira de Souza JG, Stanley K, Jovanovic S, Bianchini MA. Prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients with implant-supported fixed prostheses. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(10):861-8.

  1. Cosgarea R, Sculean A, Shibli JA, Salvi GE. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases - a critical review on the current evidence. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e063.

  2. Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: A literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(SUPPL. 8):305-15.

  3. Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. Surgical therapy for the control of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(SUPPL.6):84-94.

  4. Renvert S, Polyzois IN. Clinical approaches to treat peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):369-404.

  5. Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(September 2017):S246-66. 15. Albrektsson T, Dahlin C, Jemt T, Sennerby L, Turri A, Wennerberg A. Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(2):155-65.

  6. Casado PL, Otazu IB, Balduino A, de Mello W, Barboza EP, Duarte MEL. Identification of periodontal pathogens in healthy periimplant sites. Implant Dent. 2011 Jun;20(3):226-35.

  7. Persson GR, Renvert S. Cluster of bacteria associated with peri-implantitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):783-93.

  8. Persson GR, Renvert S. Cluster of bacteria associated with peri-implantitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;783-93.

  9. Leonhart A, Renvert S, Gunnar D. Microbiological finfings at failing implants. 1999. p. Clin Oral Implants Res. ;10:339-45.

  10. Mombelli A, Décaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(SUPPL. 11):203-13.

  11. Schwarz F, Becker K, Rahn S, Hegewald A, Pfeffer K, Henrich B. Real-time PCR analysis of fungal organisms and bacterial species at peri-implantitis sites. Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):9.

  12. Albertini M, López-Cerero L, O'Sullivan MG, Chereguini CF, Ballesta S, Ríos V, et al. Assessment of periodontal and opportunistic flora in patients with peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(8):937-41.

  13. Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Dimitrijevic B, Lekovic V, Camargo P, Kenney B. Prevalence of human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in subgingival plaque at peri-implantitis, mucositis and healthy sites. A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;40(3):271-6.

  14. Tonetti MS. Determination of the success and failure of root-form osseointegrated dental implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:173-80.

  15. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):440-6.

  16. Weyant RJ, Burt BA, Weyant RJ, Burt BA, Burt BA. An Assessment of Survival Rates and Within-patient Clustering of Failures for Endosseous Oral Implants. J Dent Res. 1993;72(1):2-8.

  17. Laine ML, Leonhardt Å, Roos-Jansåker AM, Peña AS, Van Winkelhoff AJ, Winkel EG, et al. IL-1RN gene polymorphism is associated with peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(4):380-5.

  18. Melo RF, Lopes BM V, Shibli JA, Marcantonio EJ, Marcantonio RAC, Galli GMT. Interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 expression and gene polymorphisms in subjects with peri-implant disease. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):905-14.

  19. Casado PL, Villas-Boas R, de Mello W, Duarte MEL, Granjeiro JM. Peri-implant disease and chronic periodontitis: is interleukin-6 gene promoter polymorphism the common risk factor in a Brazilian population? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(1):35-43.

  20. Ho YP, Lin YC, Yang YH, Ho KY, Wu YM, Tsai CC. Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene-765 single nucleotide polymorphism as a protective factor against periodontitis in Taiwanese. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(1):1-8.

  21. Xie CJ, Xiao LM, Fan WH, Xuan DY, Zhang JC. Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in cyclooxygenase-2 and risk of severe chronic periodontitis in a Chinese population. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(3):198-203.

  22. Schaefer AS, Richter GM, Nothnagel M, Laine ML, Noack B, Glas J, et al. COX-2 is associated with periodontitis in europeans. J Dent Res. 2010;89(4):384-8.

  23. Coli P, Christiaens V, Sennerby L, Bruyn H De. Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri-implant health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):203-17.

  24. Alassy H, Parachuru P, Wolff L. Peri-implantitis diagnosis and prognosis using biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid: A narrative review. Diagnostics. 2019;9(4).

  25. Räisänen I, Heikkinen A, Siren E, Tervahartiala T, Gieselmann D-R, van der Schoor G-J, et al. Point-of-Care/Chairside aMMP-8 Analytics of Periodontal Diseases' Activity and Episodic

Progression. Diagnostics [Internet]. 2018;8(4):74. Available from:

http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/8/4/74 36. Leppilahti JM, Ahonen MM, Hernández M, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Uitto VJ, et al. Oral rinse MMP-8 point-of-care immuno test identifies patients with strong periodontal inflammatory burden. Oral Dis. 2011;17(1):115-22.

  1. Offenbacher S, Heasman PA, Collins JG. Modulation of host PGE2 secretion as a determinant of periodontal disease expression. J Periodontol. 1993 May;64(5 Suppl):432-44.

  2. Taskan M, Gevrek F. PPAR-γ, RXR, VDR, and COX-2 Expressions in gingival tissue samples of healthy individuals, periodontitis and peri-implantitis patients. Niger J Clin

Pract [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1;23(1):46-53. Available from:

http://www.njcponline.com/article.asp?issn=1119-3077 39. Liu Y, Liu Q, Li Z, Acharya A, Chen D, Chen Z, et al. Long non-coding RNA and mRNA expression profiles in peri-implantitis vs periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2019;(May):1-12.

  1. Charalampakis G, Belibasakis GN. Microbiome of peri-implant infections: Lessons from conventional, molecular and metagenomic analyses. Virulence. 2015;6(3):183-7.

  2. Rakic M, Grusovin M, Canullo L. The Microbiologic Profile Associated with Peri-Implantitis in Humans: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;359-68.

  3. Lafaurie GI, Sabogal MA, Castillo DM, Rincón MV, Gómez LA, Lesmes YA, et al. Microbiome and Microbial Biofilm Profiles of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2017;88(10):1066-89.

  4. Padial-Molina M, López-Martínez J, O'Valle F, Galindo-Moreno P. Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7(3):1-17.

  5. Pérez-Chaparro PJ, Gonçalves C, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Lobão E, Tamashiro N, et al. Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2014;93(9):846-58.

  6. Retamal-Valdes B, Formiga M de C, Almeida ML, Fritoli A, Figueiredo KA, Westphal M, et al. Does subgingival bacterial colonization differ between implants and teeth? A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e064.

  7. Herr AE, Hatch A V, Throckmorton DJ, Tran HM, Brennan JS, Giannobile W V, et al. Microfluidic immunoassays as rapid saliva-based clinical diagnostics. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5268 LP - 5273. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/104/13/5268.abstract 47. Sorsa T, Gieselmann D, Arweiler NB, Hernández M. A quantitative point-of-care test for periodontal and dental peri-implant diseases. Nat Rev Dis Prim [Internet]. 2017;3(1):17069. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.69 48. Sorsa T. et al. (2018) Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8: Contributor to Periodontitis and a Missing Link Between Genetics, Dentistry, and Medicine. In: Bostanci N., Belibasakis G. (eds) Pathogenesis of Periodontal Diseases. Springer, ChamNo Title.

  8. Mancini S, Romanelli R, Laschinger CA, Overall CM, Sodek J, McCulloch CAG. Assessment of a Novel Screening Test for Neutrophil Collagenase Activity in the Diagnosis of Periodontal

Diseases. J Periodontol [Internet]. 1999 Nov 1;70(11):1292-302. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.11.1292 50. Sorsa T, Tervahartiala T, Leppilahti J, Hernandez M, Gamonal J, Tuomainen AM, et al. Collagenase-2 (MMP-8) as a point-of-care biomarker in periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases. Therapeutic response to non-antimicrobial properties of tetracyclines. Pharmacol Res [Internet]. 2011;63(2):108-13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.10.005 51. Axelsson P, Nyström B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):749-57.

  1. Ziebolz D, Schmalz G, Gollasch D, Eickholz P, Rinke S. Microbiological and aMMP-8 findings depending on peri-implant disease in patients undergoing supportive implant therapy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 May;88(1):47-52.

  2. Nwhator SO, Ayanbadejo PO, Umeizudike KA, Opeodu OI, Agbelusi GA, Olamijulo JA, et al. Clinical correlates of a lateral-flow immunoassay oral risk indicator. J Periodontol. 2014 Jan;85(1):188-94.

  3. Mäntylä P, Stenman M, Kinane DF, Tikanoja S, Luoto H, Salo T, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid collagenase-2 (MMP-8) test stick for chair-side monitoring of periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2003 Aug;38(4):436-9.

  4. Prazuck T, Karon S, Gubavu C, Andre J, Legall JM, Bouvet E, et al. A Finger-Stick Whole-Blood HIV Self-Test as an HIV Screening Tool Adapted to the General Public. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0146755.

  5. Alassiri S, Parnanen P, Rathnayake N, Johannsen G, Heikkinen AM, Lazzara R, et al. The Ability of Quantitative, Specific, and Sensitive Point-of-Care/Chair-Side Oral Fluid Immunotests for aMMP-8 to Detect Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases. Dis Markers. 2018;2018.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
The Relationship of Peri-implantitis With COX-2 Gene Polymorphisms, Active MMP-8 Levels, and Characterization of Associated Microbiota.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Peri-implantitis

Group Case

Genetic: Gene Polymorphisms of MMP-8
Saliva Samples
Healthy

Group Control

Genetic: Gene Polymorphisms of MMP-8
Saliva Samples

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Gene polymorphisms of MMP-8 [3 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion:

  • Screw Retained implant restorations

  • Loaded for > 12 months

  • Patients Treated for Periodontal Disease

Exclusion

  • 3 months patients should have not received antibiotics

  • Diabetes and immunosuppressant diseases

  • Periodontal maintenance in the previous 3 months

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dimitra Sakellari, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Msc, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05711407
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Frag3
First Posted:
Feb 3, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Feb 3, 2023
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Peri-Implantitis

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 3, 2023