Efficacy of Ultrasound-assisted Caudal Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency for Anal Pain in Cancer Patients,
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Our primary goal will be to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-assisted caudal epidural PRF (pulsed radiofrequency)( stimulation in patients with perineal or anal pain cancer patients using (visual analog scale (VAS) scores from 0 to 10 at the baseline (pretreatment), two, four, and eight weeks; secondary outcomes will be the effects on opioid use and total opioid use in the 24 h, quality of life, patient satisfaction and opioid and intervention related side effects.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ultrasound (US) assisted caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency
|
Procedure: US assisted caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency
patients will receive US assisted caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency and followed up to 8 weeks
|
No Intervention: conventional medical treatment
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- visual analog scale (VAS) score 4 weeks post-intervention [8 weeks]
Our primary goal will be to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-assisted caudal epidural PRF stimulation in patients with perineal or anal pain cancer patients using VAS scores from 0 to 10 at the baseline (pretreatment), two, four, and eight weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
American Society of Anesthesiology physical status of I or III (ASA), of both sex
-
cancer-related anal or perineal pain
Exclusion Criteria:
-
coagulopathies
-
allergies to the contrast dye
-
patients with moderate or significant cardiac/respiratory disease or hepatic
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assiut University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 629