AMBUVASC: Cost-utility Analysis of the Outpatient Versus Conventional Hospitalization in Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease

Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02581150
Collaborator
Ministry of Health, France (Other)
160
11
2
18
14.5
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficiency of outpatient surgery compared to conventional hospitalization in endovascular treatment of occlusive arterial disease. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective. Patients referred for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) will be randomized in two arms and a 3 months follow-up will be performed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease
N/A

Detailed Description

Rationale for ambulatory hospitalization is based on increased demand of hospital care, hospital budgets constraints and patients who ask for a prompt recovery. Consequently, physicians should find ways to optimize the resources' allocation, without compromising quality, safety and efficiency of patient care. Several studies and routine practice have shown that ambulatory hospitalization was safe but we are still lacking evidence to demonstrate the cost-utility of this kind of management.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
160 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cost-utility Analysis of the Outpatient Hospitalization Versus Conventional Hospitalization in Endovascular Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Outpatient hospitalisation

The intervention is the Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease, during an ambulatory hospitalisation, with the use of an arterial closure device (ACD). The patients treated for PAD (Peripheral Arterial Disease) are informed and prepared in the morning of D0. The surgical endovascular procedure is performed at D0 before 1:00 p.m. The patients leave the hospital in the evening at D0 after a systematic visit.

Procedure: Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease
Regarding the intervention, the technique used during the diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure shall be left to the operator's discretion, except the use of an arterial closure device (ACD). In the ambulatory hospitalisation arm, the ACD use will be mandatory. In the conventional hospitalisation arm, ACD will be used at the discretion of the interventionalist.

Other: Conventional inpatient hospitalisation

The intervention is the Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease, during a conventional hospitalisation, with or without ACD (ACD will be used at the discretion of the interventionalist). The patients treated for PAD arrive at the hospital the day before surgery (D-1). The surgical endovascular procedure takes place the next day (D0). The day after (D1), the patients leave the hospital after a systematic visit.

Procedure: Treatment of Occlusive Arterial Disease
Regarding the intervention, the technique used during the diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure shall be left to the operator's discretion, except the use of an arterial closure device (ACD). In the ambulatory hospitalisation arm, the ACD use will be mandatory. In the conventional hospitalisation arm, ACD will be used at the discretion of the interventionalist.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) comparing cost and utility in the two arms [3 months]

    The objective of the study is to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing outpatient surgery to conventional hospitalization in endovascular treatment of occlusive arterial disease. The analysis will be conducted from a society's perspective using a one-month time horizon following the date of intervention (and 2 months before intervention). A microcosting approach will be used to estimate the cost of the surgical intervention in both arms and all subsequent in-hospital and ambulatory care resources consumption will be systematically recorded during the one month follow-up period. Effectiveness will be assessed in terms of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) estimated from patients' answers to the Euroqol EQ-5D questionnaire and french preferences scores. Results will be presented as an incremental cost-per-QALY ratio.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Budget impact analysis [5 years]

    The budget impact analysis will estimate the net financial profit (the difference between the costs incurred and profits obtained, or avoided costs) in developing the ambulatory surgery in the management of PAD. The perspective adopted will be that of the health care facilities and of the National health insurance. This analysis will be conducted in a 5 years time horizon to consider a full exploitation of the potential for substitution between conventional hospitalisation and ambulatory hospitalisation for eligible patients.

  2. Complication rates [1 month]

    The major vascular complications that can occur within 30 days are: Complications Intraoperative, Hematoma, Bleeding from the groin, arteriovenous fistula, Pseudo aneurysm, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, Critical Ischemia, Infection, Thrombosis.

  3. Functional improvement [1 month]

    The assessment of the functional improvement will be performed with Rutherford Classification.

  4. Time period to back-to-work [1 month]

    The time period to back-to-work will be assessed through the measurement of the duration of sick leave for people who work.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients limping

  • Patients with PAD requiring endovascular management

  • Patients with stabilized level 1 to 3 ASA (classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology)

  • Ability to walking

  • Endovascular indicated and compatible with an introducer 5F to 7F

  • Agreeing to participate in the study and having signed an informed consent.

  • Agreeing to lend itself to a post-operative monitoring a duration of 30 days

  • Social Insured

Exclusion Criteria:
  • No possibility of an outpatient management

  • Previous participation in the AMBUVASC study

  • Refusal of patient to participate in the study

  • Patient with hemostasis disorders

  • Acute Ischemia

  • Using a more 7F introducer

  • Radial or brachial puncture

  • Antegrade femoral puncture

  • Contraindication to endovascular treatment

  • Less than one month life expectancy

  • Participation in another clinical trial

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Besançon University Hospital Besançon France
2 Colmar Hospital Colmar France
3 Dijon University Hospital Dijon France
4 Clinique de Fontaine Fontaine les Dijon France
5 La Roche sur Yon Hospital La Roche sur Yon France
6 Marseille University Hospital (La Timone) Marseille France
7 Marseille University Hospital (North) Marseille France
8 Nantes University Hospital Nantes France
9 Rennes University Hospital Rennes France
10 Rouen Clinique de l'Europe Rouen France
11 Saint-Etienne University Hospital Saint-Etienne France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nantes University Hospital
  • Ministry of Health, France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yann Gouëffic, Md., PhD., University Hospital of Nantes, France

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nantes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02581150
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RC15_0044
  • PRME-14-0444
First Posted:
Oct 20, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Nov 6, 2019
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2019

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 6, 2019