RESEDAE: Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04282473
Collaborator
(none)
134
16
24
8.4
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is a follow-up of the GRECCAR 07 cohort (NCT01380860). Patients will be evaluated 5 years following terminal colostomy to observe patient long-term patient outcomes from colostomy with and without mesh placement.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    134 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Control
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh: Material-epidemiology Study
    Anticipated Study Start Date :
    Mar 1, 2022
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Mar 1, 2023
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Mar 1, 2024

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    with mesh

    Placement of lightweight (<50g/m2) monofilament mesh during colostomy formation

    no mesh

    colostomy without mesh placement

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of parastomal hernia between groups [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Percentage patients with parastomal hernia taken from patient medical records

    2. Date of parastomal hernia [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Date of parastomal hernia taken from patient records

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Protrusion around the stoma [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Yes/no

    2. Patient reported pain [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Yes/no

    3. Occlusion [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Yes/no

    4. Incarceration [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Yes/no

    5. Patient reported quality of life [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Stoma-QoL questionnaire - a 20-item questionnaire on a four-point Likert scale with total score ranging from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score)

    6. Pain at colostomy site [5 years after colostomy formation]

      0-100 scale (no pain to intolerable pain)

    7. Discomfort [5 years after colostomy formation]

      0-100 scale (very uncomfortable to very comfortable)

    8. Patient reported satisfaction [5 years after colostomy formation]

      0-100 scale (not at all satisfied to very satisfied)

    9. Number of specialist and general consultations attended by patients between groups [5 years after colostomy formation]

      number of consultations

    10. Number of medications taken in each group [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Number of medications taken

    11. Other associated treatment received by patients in each group [5 years after colostomy formation]

      number of treatments received

    12. Rehabilitation sessions undergone by patients in each group [5 years after colostomy formation]

      number of rehabilitation sessions

    13. Sick leave taken by patients in each group [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Number of days

    14. Cost of patients care [5 years after colostomy formation]

      Euros

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • The patient must be affiliated with a health insurance programme

    • Patient was included in the GRECCAR 07 cohort (PHRC National 2011; N° RCB: 2011-A01572-39 - ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01380860)

    • Patient received colostomy 5 years ago

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • The subject is participating in another category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study

    • The subject signals opposition to participating in the study

    • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship

    • The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 L'Hôpital Jean Minjoz Besançon France
    2 CHU de Bordeaux Bordeaux France
    3 CHRU Clermont- Ferrand Hôtel -Dieu Clermont-Ferrand France
    4 Hôpital Beaujon (AP-HP) Clichy France
    5 Hôpital Albert Michallon Grenoble France
    6 Centre Oscar Lambret Lille France
    7 Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud Lyon France
    8 Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France
    9 Hôpital La Timone, AP-HM Marseille France
    10 CRLC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque Montpellier France
    11 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu - CHU de Nantes Nantes France
    12 CHU de Nimes Nîmes France 30029
    13 Hôpital Saint Antoine (AP-HP) Paris France
    14 Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes France
    15 Hôpital Charles-Nicolle Rouen France
    16 Hôpital Purpan - CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Michel Prudhomme, MD, CHU Nimes

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04282473
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NIMAO/2018-02/MP-01
    First Posted:
    Feb 24, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 8, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2022
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 8, 2022