RDN+AF: A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effect of Concomitant Renal Denervation and Cardiac Ablation on AF Recurrence

Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01907828
Collaborator
(none)
61
2
2
54
30.5
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this post market clinical investigation is to complete preliminary evaluation on whether or not concomitant renal denervation with the EnligHTN™ Renal Denervation System and cardiac ablation will result in improved outcomes as compared to ablation alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension being treated for Atrial Fibrillation

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Renal Artery Ablation
  • Device: Cardiac Ablation
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a post market, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized study of the EnligHTN™ Renal Denervation System in conjunction with atrial fibrillation ablation. Up to one hundred subjects with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and uncontrolled hypertension will be enrolled in the study. All subjects will undergo cardiac ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Per the 2:1 randomization, a minimum of 50 or 2/3 of the total patient cohort will also undergo renal artery ablation. Subjects will be followed up to years (2) years post procedure.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
61 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effect of Concomitant Renal Denervation and Cardiac Ablation on AF Recurrence
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 15, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 15, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 15, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac ablation + renal artery ablation

Renal artery ablation with the EnligHTN™ Renal Denervation System

Device: Renal Artery Ablation
Renal artery denervation using the EnligHTN™ Renal Denervation System

Device: Cardiac Ablation
Safire BLU™ Duo or Therapy Cool Path Duo Irrigated Ablation Catheter or Therapy Cool Flex Irrigated Ablation Catheter EnSite Velocity System Agilis NxT Guiding Introducer

Active Comparator: Cardiac ablation

Cardiac ablation

Device: Cardiac Ablation
Safire BLU™ Duo or Therapy Cool Path Duo Irrigated Ablation Catheter or Therapy Cool Flex Irrigated Ablation Catheter EnSite Velocity System Agilis NxT Guiding Introducer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With Freedom From Atrial Fibrillation at 12 Month [12 months]

    The freedom from atrial fibrillation was assessed based on electrocardiographic data during nine months following the blanking period including the one week recording coinciding with the 12 month follow-up visit (9 months following the 3 month blanking period).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) [7 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post procedure]

    Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were summarized as a percentage based on number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group = 39, AF group = 22).

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Experience Peri-procedural Events [30 days post procedure]

    Peri-procedural events within 30 days post procedure were summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22)

  3. Assessment of Renovascular Safety as Measured by New Renal Artery Stenosis or Aneurysm at the Site of Ablation [6 months and 12 months post procedure]

    Renovascular safety (new renal artery stenosis or aneurysm) was summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22).

  4. Renal Function Change Based on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (Renal Denervation Group Only) at 6 Months [Baseline and 6 months]

  5. Renal Function Change Based on eGFR (Renal Denervation Group Only) at 12 Months [Baseline and 12 months]

  6. Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Based on Electrocardiographic Data up to 2 Years Following the Initial Cardiac Ablation Procedure. [3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months]

    Recurrence of AF was summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects who underwent the procedure (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=20)

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving Office Systolic Blood Pressure < 140 mmHg [6 months post procedure]

  8. Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure at 12 Months [Baseline and 12 months post procedure]

    Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 22, AF group=14)

  9. Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure at 24 Months [Baseline and 24 months post procedure]

    Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 17, AF group=12)

  10. Change in Office Blood Pressure at 12 Months [Baseline and 12 months post procedure]

    Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 33, AF group=15)

  11. Change in Office Blood Pressure at 24 Months [Baseline and 24 months post procedure]

    Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 29, AF group=16).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at time of consent

  • Subject must be able and willing to provide written informed consent

  • Subject must be able and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule

  • Subject is a candidate for catheter ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation as per the hospital standard of care

  • Subject has office Systolic Blood Pressure ≥ 140 mmHg at baseline visit

  • Subject has a daytime mean Systolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure > 135 mmHg within 90 days prior to procedure

  • Subject has established hypertension (diagnosed ≥12 month prior to baseline) and is taking >3 anti-hypertensive medications, including 1 diuretic

  • Subject has been on a stable unchanged anti-hypertensive medication regimen for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the ablation procedure

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Subject has long standing atrial fibrillation

  • Subject has had a previous ablation for atrial fibrillation

  • Subject has had a previous renal denervation procedure

  • Subject has had a CABG procedure within the last 180 days (six months)

  • Subject has a left atrial thrombus

  • Subject has a contraindication to anticoagulation (i.e. heparin or warfarin)

  • Subject has unstable angina

  • Subject has had a myocardial infarction within the previous two months

  • Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% as determined by pre-procedure TTE

  • Subject has significant renovascular abnormalities such as renal artery stenosis > 30%

  • Subject has undergone prior renal angioplasty, renal denervation, indwelling renal stents, and/or abdominal aortic stent grafts

  • Subject has hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease as determined by study investigator

  • Subject has a life expectancy less than 12 months, as determined by the study investigator

  • Subject is participating in another clinical study which has the potential to impact his/her hypertension or atrial fibrillation management (pharmaceutical/device/homeopathic)

  • Subject is pregnant, nursing, or of childbearing potential and is not using adequate contraceptive methods

  • Subject has active systemic infection

  • Subject has renal arteries < 4 mm in diameter

  • Subject has an estimated GFR <45 mL/min per 1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula

  • Subject had a renal transplant or is awaiting a renal transplant

  • Subject has blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities

  • Subject has secondary arterial hypertension

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik Dresden Germany 01307
2 Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH Leipzig Germany 04289

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Abbott Medical Devices

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Piorkowski, MD, Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Abbott Medical Devices
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01907828
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SJM-CIP-0009
First Posted:
Jul 25, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 22, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Study enrollment was completed with a total of 61 participants randomized at 2 sites in Germany. The first and last participants were enrolled on May 12, 2014, and July 21, 2016, respectively.
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 39 22
Underwent Procedure 39 20
1-month Follow-up 37 17
3-month Follow-up 36 16
6-month Follow-up 35 16
12-month Follow-up 34 16
24-month Follow-up 32 16
COMPLETED 32 16
NOT COMPLETED 7 6

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF) Total
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 39 22 61
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
66.3
(7.9)
63.0
(9.9)
65.1
(8.7)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
19
48.7%
10
45.5%
29
47.5%
Male
20
51.3%
12
54.5%
32
52.5%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
Germany
39
100%
22
100%
61
100%
Height (cm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm]
172.7
(10.1)
173.6
(9.4)
173.0
(9.8)
Weight (kg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg]
95.4
(17.9)
93.7
(19.1)
94.8
(18.2)
Body mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
31.9
(5.0)
31.0
(5.4)
31.6
(5.1)
Office Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Office Systolic Blood Pressure
162.0
(18.6)
167.1
(18.5)
163.9
(18.5)
Office Diastolic Blood Pressure
87.5
(14.1)
91.4
(10.6)
88.9
(13.0)
Office Heart Rate (beats per minute (bpm)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [beats per minute (bpm)]
81.3
(23.9)
76.7
(19.5)
79.7
(22.4)
Number of Participants with a history of renal assessment prior to enrollment (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
2
5.1%
0
0%
2
3.3%
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class of Cardiac Disease (Count of Participants)
Class I
10
25.6%
11
50%
21
34.4%
Class II
24
61.5%
10
45.5%
34
55.7%
Class III
5
12.8%
1
4.5%
6
9.8%
Class IV
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Medical History (Count of Participants)
Myocardial Infarction
1
2.6%
3
13.6%
4
6.6%
Coronary Artery Disease
5
12.8%
7
31.8%
12
19.7%
Valvular Disease
27
69.2%
15
68.2%
42
68.9%
Arrhythmia
39
100%
22
100%
61
100%
Cardiomyopathy
2
5.1%
1
4.5%
3
4.9%
Neurological events/Dysfunction
2
5.1%
2
9.1%
4
6.6%
Hyperlipidemia
20
51.3%
11
50%
31
50.8%
Diabetes
16
41%
7
31.8%
23
37.7%
Smokers
17
43.6%
4
18.2%
21
34.4%
Significant Alcohol Intake
6
15.4%
0
0%
6
9.8%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
3
7.7%
1
4.5%
4
6.6%
Thyroid Disease
8
20.5%
6
27.3%
14
23%
Liver Disease
2
5.1%
4
18.2%
6
9.8%
Other Additional Medical History
38
97.4%
18
81.8%
56
91.8%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Freedom From Atrial Fibrillation at 12 Month
Description The freedom from atrial fibrillation was assessed based on electrocardiographic data during nine months following the blanking period including the one week recording coinciding with the 12 month follow-up visit (9 months following the 3 month blanking period).
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Data not collected from all participants: data were available for only 28 participants in the RDN+AF group, and 12 participants in the AF group
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 28 12
Count of Participants [Participants]
16
41%
4
18.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF), Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Kaplan-Meier analysis performed to provide freedom from atrial fibrillation rates at one year for each randomization arm using date of ablation procedure to date of first event.
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.22
Comments
Method Log Rank
Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Description Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were summarized as a percentage based on number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group = 39, AF group = 22).
Time Frame 7 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
For each group, the outcome measure was analyzed in participants randomized at baseline
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 39 22
MACE within 7 days of procedure
0
0%
2
9.1%
MACE within 6 months of procedure
0
0%
2
9.1%
MACE within 12 months of procedure
0
0%
2
9.1%
MACE within 24 months of procedure
0
0%
2
9.1%
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Experience Peri-procedural Events
Description Peri-procedural events within 30 days post procedure were summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22)
Time Frame 30 days post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Peri-procedural events within 30 days post procedure were summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22).
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 39 22
Cardiac Arrest
0
0%
1
4.5%
Pericardial Effusion
0
0%
1
4.5%
Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia
1
2.6%
0
0%
Hematoma
0
0%
1
4.5%
Pericardial Tamponade
0
0%
1
4.5%
Bleeding
0
0%
1
4.5%
VASC Pseudoaneurysm
1
2.6%
0
0%
Air Embolus
3
7.7%
0
0%
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
1
2.6%
0
0%
Vasospasm
1
2.6%
0
0%
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Assessment of Renovascular Safety as Measured by New Renal Artery Stenosis or Aneurysm at the Site of Ablation
Description Renovascular safety (new renal artery stenosis or aneurysm) was summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22).
Time Frame 6 months and 12 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Renovascular safety (new renal artery stenosis or aneurysm) was summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects at baseline for each group (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=22).
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 39 22
VASC Pseudoaneurysm at 6 months
1
2.6%
0
0%
VASC Pseudoaneurysm at 12 months
2
5.1%
0
0%
Renal Artery Stenosis at 6 months
0
0%
0
0%
Renal Artery Stenosis at 12 months
1
2.6%
0
0%
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Renal Function Change Based on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (Renal Denervation Group Only) at 6 Months
Description
Time Frame Baseline and 6 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
eGFR change from baseline was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group = 32)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation.
Measure Participants 32
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mL/min per 1.73m^2]
2.2
(11.0)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2766
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Renal Function Change Based on eGFR (Renal Denervation Group Only) at 12 Months
Description
Time Frame Baseline and 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
eGFR change from baseline was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group = 33)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation.
Measure Participants 33
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mL/min per 1.73m^2]
-0.4
(11.9)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7663
Comments
Method Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Based on Electrocardiographic Data up to 2 Years Following the Initial Cardiac Ablation Procedure.
Description Recurrence of AF was summarized as a percentage based on the number of subjects who underwent the procedure (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=20)
Time Frame 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
For each group, the outcome measure was analyzed in participants who underwent the procedure (RDN+AF group= 39, AF group=20)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 39 20
Atrial Fibrillation recurrence within 3 months
4
10.3%
4
18.2%
Atrial Fibrillation recurrence within 6 months
9
23.1%
5
22.7%
Atrial Fibrillation recurrence within 12 months
14
35.9%
8
36.4%
Atrial Fibrillation recurrence within 24 months
19
48.7%
9
40.9%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Office Systolic Blood Pressure < 140 mmHg
Description
Time Frame 6 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 35 16
Count of Participants [Participants]
4
10.3%
1
4.5%
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure at 12 Months
Description Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 22, AF group=14)
Time Frame Baseline and 12 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 22, AF group=14)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 22 14
24-Hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (ASBP)
-5.9
(15.2)
-3.1
(19.2)
24-Hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (ADBP)
-5.8
(7.4)
-8.4
(9.4)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in ASBP at 12 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0849
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -5.86
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-12.61 to 0.88
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 15.21
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in ADBP at 12 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0014
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -5.82
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-9.12 to -2.52
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 7.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ASBP at 12 months.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5599
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -3.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-14.16 to 8.02
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 19.21
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ADBP at 12 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0052
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -8.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.87 to -2.99
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 9.42
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure at 24 Months
Description Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 17, AF group=12)
Time Frame Baseline and 24 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 17, AF group=12)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 17 12
24-Hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (ASBP)
-5.7
(14.8)
-8.6
(12.4)
24-Hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (ADBP)
-6.9
(6.1)
-10.3
(8.5)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in ASBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1326
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -5.71
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-13.34 to 1.93
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 14.84
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in ADBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -6.94
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-10.06 to -3.83
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 6.06
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ASBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0354
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -8.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-16.47 to -0.70
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 12.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ADBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0015
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -10.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-15.75 to -4.91
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 8.53
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Office Blood Pressure at 12 Months
Description Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 33, AF group=15)
Time Frame Baseline and 12 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 33, AF group=15)
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 33 15
Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure (OSBP)
2.6
(24.4)
2.0
(30.0)
Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (ODBP)
-0.4
(11.8)
-5.4
(15.8)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in OSBP at 12 months.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5399
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 2.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-6.0 to 11.3
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 24.4
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (ODBP) at 12 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8489
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -0.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.6 to 3.8
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 11.8
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure (OSBP) at 12 months.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7999
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 2.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-14.6 to 18.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 30.0
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ODBP at 12 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2076
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -5.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-14.2 to 3.4
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 15.8
Estimation Comments
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Office Blood Pressure at 24 Months
Description Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 29, AF group=16).
Time Frame Baseline and 24 months post procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Change in Office Blood Pressure was summarized based on subjects with available data at both time points (RDN+AF group= 29, AF group=16).
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
Measure Participants 29 16
Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure (OSBP)
0.6
(22.3)
7.4
(22.9)
Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (ODBP)
0.5
(11.0)
-3.0
(15.5)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in OSBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8820
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 0.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-7.9 to 9.1
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 22.3
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF)
Comments Change in ODBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8019
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 0.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.7 to 4.7
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 11.0
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in OSBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2177
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 7.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.8 to 19.6
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 22.9
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Comments Change in ODBP at 24 months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4502
Comments
Method Paired Student's t-test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -3.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-11.2 to 5.2
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
Value: 15.5
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 24 months
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Arm/Group Description Participants treated with renal artery ablation using the EnligHTN System and cardiac ablation. Participants treated with cardiac ablation alone.
All Cause Mortality
Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/39 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/39 (10.3%) 3/22 (13.6%)
Cardiac disorders
Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Cardiac Arrest 0/39 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1
Pericardial Effusion 0/39 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1
Pericardial Tamponade 0/39 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Vascular disorders
VASC Pseudoaneurysm 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Renal Artery Stenosis 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Renal Artery Ablation + Cardiac Ablation (RDN+AF) Cardiac Ablation (AF)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/39 (10.3%) 2/22 (9.1%)
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Air Embolus 3/39 (7.7%) 3 0/22 (0%) 0
Vascular disorders
Hematoma 0/39 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1
Bleeding 0/39 (0%) 0 1/22 (4.5%) 1
Vasospasm 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0
VASC Pseudoaneurysm 1/39 (2.6%) 1 0/22 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Rebecca Maslow, MA, Clinical Project Manager
Organization Abbott
Phone +1 651-756-5564
Email rebecca.maslow@abbott.com
Responsible Party:
Abbott Medical Devices
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01907828
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SJM-CIP-0009
First Posted:
Jul 25, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 22, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020