PSYCHOFIBRO: Personality, Defences, Central Sensitization, and Trauma in Women With Chronic Migraine, Fibromyalgia, and Vulvodynia

Sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06138171
Collaborator
University of Milan (Other), Pavia IRCCS Mondino di Pavia (Other), Azienda Policlinico Umberto I (Other)
432
1
24
18

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Chronic pain (CP) is a substantial healthcare challenge with considerable economic costs. Recently, the term Nociplastic Pain (NP) has been introduced as a third descriptor of mechanisms related to CP. NP describes conditions that arise from altered nociception despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage. It represents a new way of describing somatoform painful conditions, originating from altered central-nervous pathways (e.g., central sensitization) and with the important involvement of clinical psychological factors. Among nociplastic chronic syndromes have been included fibromyalgia (FM), chronic migraine (CM) and vulvodynia (VU). These chronic pain disorders have been usually studied separately, although the high comorbidity rates. Many studies evidenced the role of psychosocial variables in the onset and maintenance of the burden related to these conditions. Among them, personality traits, defense mechanisms, central sensitization, and childhood traumatic experiences may play a pivotal role in the onset of the NP. The first aim of this study is to highlight possible psychosocial clusters of variables that are specific for each condition (FM, CM, and VU). A second aim, to improve the tailored psychological treatment devoted to these conditions, is to explore the association between FM, CM, and VU with depression, anxiety, somatization, quality of life, alexithymia, social support, sexual satisfaction, and functioning. This will make it possible to identify specifically for each condition the areas of greatest interest that can be investigated and treated in clinical intervention. To identify specific descriptors, NP conditions will be compared with a control group of subjects reporting other types of CP (e.g., knee arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis). The study involves the collection of data from a self-administered questionnaire in several Italian centers specializing in the above-mentioned clinical conditions under the guidance of the research team of the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, PI Professor Federica Galli.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Psychological self-reported measures assesment (questionnaire)

Detailed Description

Chronic pain (CP), defined as pain lasting more than 3 months, is a substantial healthcare challenge. Prevalence rates of CP are between 11% and 40% (Dahlhamer et al., 2018; Fayaz et al., 2016). CP prevalence increases with age, is greater among females, and among people with lower socioeconomic status (Tsang et al., 2008; Pergolizzi et al., 2013). CP affects relationships and self-esteem, and is associated with higher divorce and suicide rates, and an increased risk of substance abuse (Tang et al., 2016; Fitzcharles et al., 2021), psychopathology (Katz et al., 2015) and risk of medication overuse (Westergaard et al., 2015). The causes of CP are still poorly understood. Recently, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP, 2017) has proposed that three subtypes of CP may be differentiated based on unique causal mechanisms: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic.

Nociplastic Pain (NP) is a new descriptor of CP and includes conditions that arise from altered nociception despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage. NP should be viewed as an overarching term that can be applied to a diverse range of clinical conditions that share common neurophysiological mechanisms, involving various organ systems (Galli, 2023). Among nociplastic chronic syndromes have been included chronic migraine, fibromyalgia, and vulvodynia (Bergeron et al., 2020; Fitzcharles et al., 2021). NP is usually accompanied by other central nervous system-associated symptoms with a close link with clinical psychological factors: general symptoms (e.g., fatigue and cognitive problems), temperamental characteristics (e.g., hypersensitivity to environmental stimuli) and psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety/depression) (Fitzcharles et al., 2021). Many emotional states, such as depression and anxiety, and emotional processes, such as emotional awareness and regulation, may influence the presence and severity of NP (Aaron et al., 2020; Lumley et al., 2021), opening to the importance of a psychological assessment for diagnosis and psychological interventions. The concept of NP opens a new framework for understanding the co-occurrence of different chronic disorders and the role of related psychological factors. Comorbid chronic disorders may be the expression of shared pathophysiological mechanisms, with etiological and psychological features differentiating them by "pure" forms of the same disease. The comorbid association of migraine, fibromyalgia, and vulvodynia, and the well-known link with clinical psychological factors (e.g., early traumatic events, anxiety and depression, alexithymia, dissociation, etc.) is quite established (Bergeron et al., 2020; Fitzcharles et al., 2021). However, these chronic pain disorders have been usually studied as separate diseases. On the one hand, this research project wants to observe the common basis of these chronic pain disorders, which can be traced back to central sensitization mechanisms, the influence of early adverse events, and other psychological factors, and on the other hand it wants to observe the psychosocial peculiarities of each assessed condition (fibromyalgia, migraine, and vulvodynia) for tailored treatment purposes.

CHRONIC MIGRAINE (CM) Migraine affects ~15% of the general population globally and is typically characterized by recurring, often highly disabling attacks of severe headache, nausea, vomiting, super- sensitivity to light and sound, and other variable physical, mental, and psychological signs and symptoms, lasting for 4-72 h (Ferrari et al., 2022). Migraine is listed by The Global Burden of Disease Study as the third most disabling disease worldwide (Vos et al., 2012). Most patients have episodic migraine, although some patients develop CM (the presence of ≥15 headache days per month). The 1- year prevalence of migraine is 8-15% worldwide, but is highly dependent on age, sex, and migraine subtype (Ferrari et al., 2015). Migraine is 40-60% determined by genetic factors and for the remainder by non- genetic risk- modulating and trigger factors. Although a progressive increase of the attack frequency can occur spontaneously, it is often aggravated and/or induced by overuse of acute headache medications and/or caffeine. Risk factors for migraine progression toward CM include high headache frequency, high headache-related disability, obesity, allodynia, anxiety, and depression (Ferrari et al., 2022). Comorbid migraine and anxiety/depression are common in the general population, but the mechanism(s) supporting the comorbidity are still unknown. Overall, there seems to be a bidirectional relationship between migraine and depression, and a shared pathophysiological mechanism has been recently outlined (Karsan & Goadsby, 2021). Indeed, in cohort studies, the risk of incident migraine in persons with existing major depression was threefold higher than in persons without depression, and incident major depression in persons with pre- existing migraine was more than fivefold higher than in persons without migraine history (Modgill et al., 2011). Comorbid anxiety/depression increases the risk of migraine chronification (Guidetti et al., 1998; Tietjen et al., 2007). However, there is no evidence that treating depression or anxiety mitigates migraine (Ferrari et al., 2022). Other psychological factors have been linked to migraine over time, as the case of alexithymia (Galli et al., 2017, Bottiroli et al., 2018), traumatic events (Bottiroli et al., 2019; Stensland et al., 2013), early episodes of maltreatment (Tietjen et al., 2016), personality characteristics (Bottiroli et al., 2016; 2021; Galli et al., 2019).

FIBROMYALGIA (FM) FM is a chronic syndrome characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain associated with fatigue, nonrestorative sleep, and cognitive deficits (Wolfe et al., 2016) with high incidence among women (Branco et al., 2010). The prevalence of CP comorbidities among FM patients was also high ranging from 39% to 76% (with headache and irritable bowel syndrome that were the most prevalent). Although a central sensitization phenomenon seems to play a central role in FM (Arnold et al., 2016), the etiopathology of FM remains unknown (Thieme et al., 2017). For these reasons, researchers have proposed a biopsychosocial model of interacting variables that can activate and exacerbate FM symptoms (Sommer et al., 2012). FM patients experience excessive levels of psychological distress: 20-80% experience anxiety and 13-64% experience depression (Galvez-Sánchez et al., 2019). A recent systematic review on comorbidities in FM (Kleykamp et al., 2021) found that the most prevalent comorbidity across all studies reviewed was depression/major depressive disorder with over half of the patients included having this diagnosis in their lifetime. Another interesting personality construct involved in FM is 'distressed' personality (van Middendorp et al., 2016). Moreover, nearly one-third of FM patients had current or lifetime bipolar disorder, panic disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder. Specifically, among environmental factors, stressful life events have been considered (Nakamura et al., 2014). Trauma and major life stress are unlikely to cause FM per se. In genetically susceptible persons, it is likely that early trauma and prolonged stress in adulthood will influence brain modulatory circuitry of both pain and emotions (Crofford, 2007; Schweinhardt et al., 2008) that could explain the increased pain responses and symptoms of patients with FM. Traumatic events have been shown to influence pain severity as well (Bote et al., 2013). Several theoretical models have suggested that some personality characteristics lead to a worse response to stressors and adjustment to diseases in people with CP, such as FM (Naylor et al., 2017; Galvez-Sánchez et al., 2019). A minority of studies have focused on the detection of personality disorders associated with FM (Attademo & Bernardini, 2018). In general, previous studies found a high prevalence of avoidance (41.4%), obsessive-compulsive (33.1%) and borderline personality disorder (5.2-27.4%) in FM (Thieme et al., 2004; Uguz et al., 2010; Gumà-Uriel et al., 2016). In recent years, many studies on FM have reported a high prevalence of alexithymia (15-20%) (Di Tella et al., 2017; Marchi et al., 2019; Atzeni et al., 2019).

VULVODYNIA Vulvodynia is a condition that occurs in 8-10% of women of all ages (Arnold et al., 2007; Harlow et al., 2014) and is characterized by localized pain in the vulva, either spontaneous or upon touch, and can occur during sexual and/or non-sexual situations (Bergeron et al., 2020). Vulvodynia has a negative effect on the quality of life of women and their partners and imposes a profound personal and social economic burden. The diagnosis is established through a careful history and pelvic examination, including the cotton swab test, based on persistent vulvar pain lasting more than 3 months without an identifiable cause and with several potential associated factors. These include musculoskeletal and neurological factors, comorbid pain syndromes (such as fibromyalgia, chronic migraine, and irritable bowel syndrome) and psychosocial factors (Reed et al., 2012; Wesselmann et al., 2014; Bergeron et al., 2020). Current literature suggests that the onset and maintenance of vulvodynia likely involves a complex interplay of peripheral and central pain mechanisms, pelvic floor muscle and autonomic dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and adverse childhood events, as well as cognitive-affective, behavioral, and interpersonal factors (Bergeron et al., 2020). Vulvodynia has traditionally been conceptualized in a dualistic manner, arising from either physical factors or psychological and sexual difficulties, although research contrary to this concept and other hypotheses suggest that these two perspectives should be combined. Therefore, future studies should move in this direction, seeking to identify specific pathophysiological mechanisms within the framework of a biopsychosocial model. Indeed, a more recent theorization has focused on an integrated model that considers the interdependence of biopsychosocial factors in vulvodynia and associated disorders, in which medical and psychosocial mechanisms are considered to contribute to the onset, chronicization and exacerbation of pain and associated difficulties (Bergeron et al., 2011). The neurophysiology of vulvodynia is multifaceted. It is characterized by both peripheral and central sensory abnormalities (Wesselmann et al., 2014; Pukall et al., 2016). Furthermore, increased sensitivity to different sensory modalities at extragenital sites has been demonstrated in women with vulvodynia (Giesecke et al., 2004; Foster et al., 2005; Sutton et al., 2015), suggesting central sensitization. This central sensitization could explain the observation of overlapping chronic pain conditions in women with vulvodynia, which need further investigation to be better understood.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO NP As the investigators have already pointed out separately for the three pathological conditions (chronic migraine, fibromyalgia, and vulvodynia), there is evidence that factors such as personality traits, defense mechanisms, central sensitization, and childhood traumatic experiences may contribute significantly to the genesis of these disorders through a process of central sensitization of pain pathways. Central sensitization (CS) is defined as increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to their normal or subthreshold afferent input according to the IASP - International Association for the Study of Pain (Arendt-Nielsen et al., 2018). A sensitized nervous system has been considered one of the most important mechanisms involved in NP (Cohen, 2022). CS plays a role in fibromyalgia, in which alteration of central nociceptive processing occurs and pain can be worsened by psychological factors (Sluka & Clauw, 2016). In migraine, CS may contribute to acute allodynia and headache chronification (De Tommaso & Sciruicchio, 2016). Furthermore, in migraine CS may play a role in trigeminal nerve activation and cortical spreading depression (De Tommaso & Sciruicchio, 2016). It has been suggested that migraine may be considered as a brain state of altered excitability and a disorder of sensory processing (Goadsby et al., 2017), encompassing additional symptoms as fatigue and mood disorders (Karsan & Goadsby, 2021). Structural and functional MRI studies in women with provoked vulvar or distant/extra- genital pain have supported a role of central sensitization and dysregulation of endogenous pain modulatory systems in the central nervous system in the pathophysiology of vulvodynia (Bergeron et al., 2020).

In the process of central sensitization, psychological factors such as traumatic events in childhood, the development of specific personality expressions (traits), and the use of different forms of defense mechanisms also play a role. No study to our knowledge has yet tried to identify specific clusters of psychological factors (personality traits, defense mechanisms, central sensitization, and childhood traumatic experiences) capable of characterizing or differentiating between the different pathologies expressed by a NP.

In addition to this, the study of psychosocial factors associated with the experience of such pathologies or possible emerging clusters such as depression, anxiety, somatization, quality of life, alexithymia, social support, sexual satisfaction, and functioning. This will make it possible to identify specifically for each condition the areas of greatest interest that can be investigated and treated in clinical intervention tailored to the person.

Aims To highlight possible psychosocial clusters of variables that are specific to the onset and maintenance for each condition (FM, CM, and VU). Specifically, the observation of possible clusters will be made based on variables such as personality traits, defense mechanisms, central sensitization, and childhood traumatic experiences. The hypothesis is that specific psychological factors (clusters of high number of early traumatic events, high levels of central sensitization, and specific traits and defense mechanisms) characterize FM, CM, and VU groups compared to controls.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
432 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Psychological Layers of Nociplastic Pain: Cluster Analysis of The Role of Personality Traits, Defence Mechanisms, Central Sensitization, and Childhood Traumatic Experiences in Patients With Chronic Migraine, Fibromyalgia, and Vulvodynia
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Fibromyalgia - FM

Cohort of women diagnosed with FM recruited consecutively in the clinical department following the criteria: age range 18-65 years education > 5 years diagnosis of FM according to Wolfe, 2016 Exclusion criteria severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive impairment difficulties in comprehension/expression in Italian history of other chronic pain disorder(s) history of other neurological disorders besides migraine

Other: Psychological self-reported measures assesment (questionnaire)
The study involves the administration of a protocol of self-report questionnaires consisting of two parts: the main (about 25 minutes for the administration) and the optional one (additional 20 minutes). This decision stems from the realization of the length of the protocol, to increase the collection of data in pursuit of the main objective of the study (cluster analysis).

Chronic migraine - CM

Cohort of women diagnosed with CM recruited consecutively in the clinical department following the criteria: age range 18-65 years education > 5 years diagnosis of CM according to Olesen, 2017 Exclusion criteria severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive impairment difficulties in comprehension/expression in Italian history of other chronic pain disorder(s) history of other neurological disorders besides migraine

Other: Psychological self-reported measures assesment (questionnaire)
The study involves the administration of a protocol of self-report questionnaires consisting of two parts: the main (about 25 minutes for the administration) and the optional one (additional 20 minutes). This decision stems from the realization of the length of the protocol, to increase the collection of data in pursuit of the main objective of the study (cluster analysis).

Vulvodynia - VU

Cohort of women diagnosed with VU recruited consecutively in the clinical department following the criteria: age range 18-65 years education > 5 years diagnosis of VU according to Bornstein et al., 2016 Exclusion criteria severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive impairment difficulties in comprehension/expression in Italian history of other chronic pain disorder(s) history of other neurological disorders besides migraine

Other: Psychological self-reported measures assesment (questionnaire)
The study involves the administration of a protocol of self-report questionnaires consisting of two parts: the main (about 25 minutes for the administration) and the optional one (additional 20 minutes). This decision stems from the realization of the length of the protocol, to increase the collection of data in pursuit of the main objective of the study (cluster analysis).

Control group (no chronic pain condition)

Cohort of women recruited consecutively from the general population with the following criteria: age range 18-65 years education > 5 years no previous diagnosis of chronic pain conditions Exclusion criteria severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive impairment difficulties in comprehension/expression in Italian history of other chronic pain disorder(s) history of other neurological disorders

Other: Psychological self-reported measures assesment (questionnaire)
The study involves the administration of a protocol of self-report questionnaires consisting of two parts: the main (about 25 minutes for the administration) and the optional one (additional 20 minutes). This decision stems from the realization of the length of the protocol, to increase the collection of data in pursuit of the main objective of the study (cluster analysis).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Central sensitivity index [Day 0]

    Central Sensitivity Inventory (CSI) (Chiarotto et al., 2018). Range scores go from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse conditions.

  2. Traumatic experiences index [Day 0]

    Traumatic Experiences Checklist (TEC) (Nijenhuis et al., 2002). Range scores go from 0 to 29, with higher scores indicating more traumatic experiences in life.

  3. Personality traits [Day 0]

    PID-5 Short form (Thimm et al., 2016). Range scores go from 0 to 75, with higher scores indicating higher presence of disfunctional personality traits

  4. Defense mechanisms [Day 0]

    Defense Mechanism Rating Scales - DMRS-SR-30 (Di Giuseppe et al., 2020). Range scores go from 3.5 to 7, with higher scores indicating more consistent use of defense mechanisms.

  5. Mental pain [Day 0]

    Mental Pain Questionnaire (Svicher et al., 2019). Range scores go from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse conditions.

  6. Environmental sensitivity [Day 0]

    Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSP-12) (Aron & Aron, 1997; Lionetti et al., 2018). Range scores go from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating worse conditions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Presence and intensity of psychological symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychosomaitcs [Day 0]

    Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) (Franke et al., 2017) Range scores go from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating worse conditions.

  2. Physical and Psychological Quality of life index [Day 0]

    SF-12 - Quality of Life Assessment (Apolone et al., 2001). Range scores go from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

  3. Alexithymic traits [Day 0]

    Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) (Bagby et al., 1994). Range scores go from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher alexithymic traits.

  4. Percieved Social Support [Day 0]

    SPQ - Social Support Questionnaire (SPQ) (van der Lugt et al., 2012). Range scores go from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher support received by social network.

  5. Sexual Satisfaction [Day 0]

    Sexual Satisfaction Scale (SSS) - Short form) (Meston & Trapnell, 2005). Range scores go from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher level of sexual satisfaction.

  6. gentipolvic pain [Day 0]

    Short Form McGill Questionnaire (SF-MGQ) - Adapted for genito-pelvic pain (Melzack & Raja, 2005). Range scores go from 0 to 83, with higher scores indicating more genital pain.

  7. Sexual Functioning [Day 0]

    Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (Rosen et al., 2000). Range scores go from 2.6 to 36, with higher scores indicating better sexual health.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion criteria:
  • age range 18-65 years

  • education > 5 years

  • diagnosis of FM according to Wolfe, 2016

  • diagnosis of CM according to Olesen, 2017

  • diagnosis of VU according to Bornstein et al., 2016

Exclusion criteria

  • severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive impairment

  • difficulties in comprehension/expression in Italian

  • history of other chronic pain disorder(s)

  • history of other neurological disorders besides migraine

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Rome Italy 00100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Roma La Sapienza
  • University of Milan
  • Pavia IRCCS Mondino di Pavia
  • Azienda Policlinico Umberto I

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Federica M Galli, AP, University of Roma La Sapienza

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Federica Galli, Professore Associato (Associate Professor), University of Roma La Sapienza
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06138171
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 0001979
First Posted:
Nov 18, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 18, 2023
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Federica Galli, Professore Associato (Associate Professor), University of Roma La Sapienza
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 18, 2023