Validating Low FDG Dose PET/CT Compared to Current Standard of Care Dose PET/CT

Sponsor
Ohio State University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03519659
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH), Ohio Third Frontier (Other)
204
1
6
113.4
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess new low radiation dose techniques for clinical PET/CT scans through intra-individual comparison between a clinical, standard dose scan and a low-dose scan, completed within one week of each other.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
  • Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 5 mCi radiation dose
  • Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 2.5 mCi radiation dose
  • Diagnostic Test: PET/CT Scan with 6.5 mCi radiation dose
  • Diagnostic Test: PET/CT Scan with not yet determined radiation dose
N/A

Detailed Description

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) imaging using 18F-FDG is an important, commonly used cancer, neuroscience and cardio-vascular imaging methodology to detect disease and to monitor therapeutic interventions. While considerable technological progress of PET/CT systems has occurred over the last decade, we have not re-evaluated the ability to potentially reduce the radiation burden of the used PET imaging pharmaceutical (FDG).

This early phase trial intends to accomplish the following:
  • to validate that the radiation dose burden from the PET imaging pharmaceutical (FDG) can be reduced by more than 50% from the current standard of clinical care (SOC) level without affecting the diagnostic ability;

  • to confirm that a low dose approach will be feasible for response assessment;

  • to validate that the difference in FDG uptake between imaging 60 min +/- 10 min post injection and 75 min +/- 10 min post injection is independent/equivalent of the injected FDG dose

  • to validate a simulation methodology to streamline future dose finding studies for PET imaging pharmaceuticals.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
204 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Validating Low FDG Dose PET/CT Compared to Current Standard of Care Dose PET/CT
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 21, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Sub-Study A

Patients receive PET/CT scan on Gemini Astonish PET/CT

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
13 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 5 mCi radiation dose
5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Experimental: Sub-Study B

Patients receive PET/CT scan on Biograph mCT

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
13 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 5 mCi radiation dose
5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Experimental: Sub-Study C

Patients receive PET/CT scan on Discovery PET/CT

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
13 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 5 mCi radiation dose
5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Experimental: Sub-Study D

Patients receive PET/CT scan on Vereos 128 digital PET/CT

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
13 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 5 mCi radiation dose
5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Experimental: Sub-Study E

Patients receive lower radiation dose on Vereos 128 digital PET/CT

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 2.5 mCi radiation dose
2.5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT Scan with 6.5 mCi radiation dose
6.5 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Experimental: Sub-Study F

Patients receive PET/SCAN using system that did not show equivalence in Sub-Study A-C

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT scan with 13 mCi radiation dose
13 mCi 18F-FDG dose

Diagnostic Test: PET/CT Scan with not yet determined radiation dose
We plan for the possibility that one of the three-Sub-Studies (A-B) would not demonstrate equivalency, and we would then perform a modified protocol in which the SOC dosing is compared to a lower and higher dose than originally tested.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Image quality [through study completion, on average 2-5 years]

    assessed by blinded readers

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Artifacts [through study completion, on average 2-5 years]

    assessed by blinded readers

  2. Lesion detectability [through study completion, on average 2-5 years]

    assessed by blinded readers

  3. Image noise [through study completion, on average 2-5 years]

    assessed by blinded readers

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male and female patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age

  • Patients scheduled for a standard of care PET/CT scan

  • For female patients of child-bearing potential, the OSUWMC requirements for receiving the standard of care PET imaging agent and CT examination needs to be met

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participants who are pregnant or lactating

  • Prisoners

  • Participants incapable of giving informed consent

  • Patients unable to lie flat on the scanner for extended periods of time

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio United States 43221

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ohio State University
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Ohio Third Frontier

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael V Knopp, MD, PhD, Ohio State University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Michael V. Knopp MD, PhD, Professor, Ohio State University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03519659
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RP0308/2014H0437
  • R01CA195513
First Posted:
May 9, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Apr 19, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 19, 2022