Physical Status and Upper Airway Function in Neuromuscular Patients

Sponsor
Universidad de Granada (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04473612
Collaborator
(none)
41
1
1.4
29

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Inside of studies that report an upper airway function impaired, the upper limb strength has been demonstrated to be determinant in breath, speech and swallow performance. Nevertheless, no previous studies in neuromuscular disease have explored the relation between general disability and upper airway function.

There is a suspicion of upper airway which is associated with physical deterioration, however the extent to which if feeds back has not been explored.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    41 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Control
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Degree Physical Status and Upper Airway Function in Neuromuscular Patients
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Jul 20, 2020
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Aug 15, 2020
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Sep 1, 2020

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Neuromuscular low physical status group

    Patients diagnosed of Neuromuscular disease with low physical status

    Neuromuscular high physical status group

    Patients diagnosed of Neuromuscular disease with high physical status

    Control group

    Healthy subjects

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hand grip strength [Baseline]

      Hand grip strength will be evaluated with a pressure dynamometer according to the protocol, to their maximum ability in a seated position . The average of three attempts for the dominant hand will be recorded. It has been proven that it can be used as an indicator of general health and as a strong predictor of future mortality, disability, falls, complications and resource utilization.

    2. Respiratory function [Baseline]

      Respiratory function will be evaluated with spirometry following standardized protocols. Collected variables will be Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV).

    3. Peak expiratory flow [Baseline]

      Peak expiratory flow is a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. It will be measured following standardized protocols.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) [Baseline]

      The perception of the level of health and the quality of life were evaluated with the questionnaire European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). It is composed of 2 parts in which health status is assessed: Descriptive system: It consists on 5 dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients classify their health status in 3 severity levels: having no problems, having some or moderate problems, being unable to do/having extreme problems. Visual Analog Scale, by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

    2. Fatigue Severity Scale [Baseline]

      Fatigue severity scale (FSS) will be used to measure fatigue. It consists of 9 items with answers that the patient scores between 1 and 7. The total is calculated by adding all the items. For children will be used The PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, which is composed of 18 items comprising 3 dimensions (general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, cognitive fatigue), evaluated thorough a Liker scale with values from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always), referring to difficulty presented.

    3. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS) 2.0 (WD2) [Baseline]

      To measure the degree of disability, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS 2.0 (WD2) will be used. It measures changes in functioning and levels of difficulty in carrying out and carrying out its activities . The WD2 scale is composed of 36 items divided into 6 domains, evaluated through a Likert scale with values from 1 to 5, referring to the difficulty presented. Higher scores show a greater degree of disability.

    4. Activity Limitations in Children and Adults With Neuromuscular Disorders (ACTIVLIM) [Baseline]

      The Activity Limitations in Children and Adults With Neuromuscular Disorders (ACTIVLIM) questionnaire is an instrument to measure functional limitation and has been calibrated in children and adults with neuromuscular diseases, according to the difficulty of patients to perform daily activities that require the use of the upper extremities and / or lower.

    5. Brief pain inventory [Baseline]

      For pain assessment we will use a specific brief pain questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory , which consists of three parts. In the first, the patient will indicate in a drawing the area in which he presents this pain. The second part refers to the pain felt in the last days, where it is scored, as in the previous questionnaire, from 0 to 10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the maximum pain felt). Finally, in a third part we see how that pain influences the different activities that the patient performs in his day to day.

    6. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [Baseline]

      Anxiety and depression will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) . This scale is composed of 14 items divided into two subscales, 7 items of anxiety and 7 items of depression, involving higher values worse psycho-emotional state.

    7. Muscle strength of the neck [Baseline]

      To evaluate the muscle strength of the neck in neuromuscular patients, neck dynamometry will be performed. With subtests in which front bending, extension, pure lateral flexion, lateral flexion with rotation and pure rotation were measures.

    8. Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) [Baseline]

      The EAT-10 is a self-administered instrument that evaluate specific symptoms of dysphagia with 10 items and each item have a range from zero (no problem to swallow) to four (a serious problem for life). In the case of patients pediatric with dysphagia it used Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI-EAT-10)

    9. Swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) [Baseline]

      To measure the possible swallowing problems in daily life we will used the SWAL-QOL, it contains 44 items and each item was scored from zero (the worst state) to four (the best state) . This questionnaire consists of 44 items, consisting of 11 subscales. With a Likert type score in which the patient scores between 1 and 5. Where 1 indicates the worst state and 5 the most favorable.

    10. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) questionnaire [Baseline]

      The severity of swallowing will be assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) questionnaire . This scale consists of 7 levels, with 1 being the most severe and 7 being the least severe, the patient has to select the level with which he is.

    11. Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) [Baseline]

      There are also questionnaires like Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) , that permitted us evaluate the function of chewing, this test has not been used in previous studies in adults, so in this study we have only used it in the childrens patients.

    12. Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) [Baseline]

      Clinical evaluation of the orofacial myofunctional condition will be evaluated using the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) . It consisting of 4 subscales: appearance and posture, mobility and functions (breathing, deglutition, mastication). The examiner attributed scores on a 3 point scale: 3=normal, 2= insufficient ability; and 1= absence of ability or being unable to perform the task.

    13. Volume Viscosity Clinical Exploration Method (MECV-V) [Baseline]

      Volume Viscosity Clinical Exploration Method (MECV-V) , this test provides us with information about the volume to which the 5ml, 10ml and 20 ml patients are able to feed and tells us what viscosity, nectar, liquid and pudding. It is used in the diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

    14. Voice handicap index (VHI-30) [Baseline]

      The phonatory function and it´s repercussion on daily life will be evaluated by the Voice handicap index (VHI-30) . This scale consists of 30 items, consisting of 3 subscales, functional, physical and emotional. In which the patient must indicate the presence or symptoms of dysphonia with a Likert type score of 5 points, in which 0 indicates never and 4 always indicates.

    15. Grade, Roughness, Breathing, Asthenia, Effort (GRBAS) [Baseline]

      Perceptual scale of Grade, Roughness, Breathing, Asthenia, Effort (GRBAS) . Will be used to analyze qualitative aspects of the voice, it is completed by the evaluator who qualifies as: 0 normal, 1 mild, 2 moderate, 3 severe, each quality of the voice (Degree of dysphonia, scratchy, blown, weak or asthenic, tight or strangled).

    16. Functional evaluation of the voice [Baseline]

      The functional evaluation of the voice will allow us to measure the intensity, frequency and duration of the voice: To evaluate the intensity of the voice, measured in decibels (dB), we will use a sound level meter; To evaluate the frequency of the voice , measured in Hz (Hz), we use the PRAAT software (Praat from the Dutch "speak"). In addition, the duration of the phonation and breathing times , measured in Sg, will be evaluated, for this we use an audio recorder.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    6 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosis of Neuromuscular disease

    • Between 6 and 65 years

    • Impairment of the upper airway

    • Accepted to sign the informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Cognitive impairment.

    • Diagnose of autism spectrum disorder or severe intellectual disability

    • Physical or functional impairment that limits the performance of evaluation

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Granada Granada Spain

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Universidad de Granada

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Marie Carmen Valenza, Principal Investigator; PT; PhD, Universidad de Granada
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04473612
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • DF0091UG
    First Posted:
    Jul 16, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 14, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 14, 2020