SHIELD: Pipeline Flex With SHield Technology Embolization - An International MulticEnter ObservationaL Post Market StuDy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center post-market observational study assessing the performance of the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ in subjects undergoing treatment for intracranial aneurysms in a large real-world, post-market setting.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Eligible subjects will be treated with the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™.
Subjects will undergo standard of care follow-up visits. Data generated per standard of care will be collected for 1 year beyond the index procedure.
This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply. (That is, clinical trial information for this applicable clinical trial was submitted under section 402 (j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42 CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402 (j)(2) and (3) of the Public Health Service Act or 42 CFR 11.24 and 11.44.)
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Safety - Stroke/Death Occurrence [1 year]
Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurological death post-procedure (1-year)
- Effectiveness - Aneurysm Occlusion [1 year]
Percentage (%) of Participants who have achieved complete aneurysm occlusion (defined as Raymond-Roy grade 1) without significant parent artery stenosis (≤ 50%) or retreatment of the target aneurysm post-procedure (1-year)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Safety - Stroke/Death Occurrence - 30 Days [30 days]
Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurological death at 30 days post-procedure due to procedural complications
- Safety - Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) [1 year]
Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a delayed intracerebral hemorrhage > 30 days post-procedure
- Effectiveness - Deployment Rate [1 year]
Percentage (%) of Participants who have had a successful deployment of the device at the target site. A device is considered properly deployed when it covers the entire length of the aneurysm neck.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subject has provided written Data Release Form (DRF) or informed consent using the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/ Ethic Committee (EC)-approved consent form and agrees to comply with protocol requirements.
-
At least 18 years of age.
-
Subject has already been selected for flow diversion therapy as the appropriate treatment.
-
Subject has a target IA that has a parent vessel with diameter 1.5-5.0 mm distal/proximal to the target IA.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Major surgery including endovascular procedures within the past 30 days.
-
Subject with target IA located in the basilar artery
-
Subject with anatomy not appropriate for endovascular treatment due to severe intracranial vessel tortuosity or stenosis determined from baseline or pre-procedure imaging, or a history of intracranial vasospasm not responsive to medical therapy.
-
Stent is in place in the parent artery at the target IA location.
-
Subject with an acutely (within 30 days) ruptured aneurysm with a Hunt and Hess grade of 4 or higher.
-
Any known contraindication to treatment with the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ per Instructions for Use.
-
The investigator determines that the health of the subject or the validity of the study outcomes (e.g., high risk of neurologic events, conditions that may increase the chance of stroke, worsening of clinical condition in the last 30 days) may be compromised by the subject's enrollment.
-
Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women who wish to become pregnant during the length of study participation.
-
Subject is currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Co-enrollment in concurrent trials is only allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from Medtronic.
-
Legal incapacity or evidence that a subject cannot understand the purpose and risks of the study or inability to comply fully with study procedures.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gold Coast University Hospital | Southport | Australia | QLD 4215 | |
2 | Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | Denmark | 2100 | |
3 | Turun Yliopistollinen keskussairaala | Turku | Finland | ||
4 | Hôpital Bicêtre | Le Kremlin-Bicêtre | France | ||
5 | Universitätsklinikum Augsburg | Augsburg | Germany | ||
6 | Charité Centrum | Berlin | Germany | ||
7 | Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus | Essen | Germany | ||
8 | Universitätsklinikums Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Germany | ||
9 | Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes | Homburg | Germany | ||
10 | Hellenic Airforce Hospital | Athens | Greece | ||
11 | Országos Klinikai Idegtudományi Intézet | Budapest | Hungary | ||
12 | Hadassah Medical Organization | Jerusalem | Israel | ||
13 | Ospedale M. Bufalini | Cesena | Italy | ||
14 | Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta | Milan | Italy | ||
15 | Hospital Universitario Cruces | Barakaldo | Spain | ||
16 | Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz | Madrid | Spain | 28040 | |
17 | Hospital Universitario de la Princesa | Madrid | Spain | ||
18 | Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro | Madrid | Spain | ||
19 | Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias | Oviedo | Spain | ||
20 | Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom | B15 2TH | |
21 | Royal Preston Hospital | Preston | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Medtronic Neurovascular Clinical Affairs
- Medtronic Bakken Research Center
Investigators
- Study Chair: Saleh Lamin, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):858-68. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
- Chitale R, Gonzalez LF, Randazzo C, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser R, Chalouhi N, Gordon D, Jabbour P. Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):679-91; discussion 691. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260fe86.
- Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafé A, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Jabbour P, Levy E, McDougall C, Siddiqui A, Szikora I, Woo H, Albuquerque F, Bozorgchami H, Dashti SR, Delgado Almandoz JE, Kelly ME, Turner R 4th, Woodward BK, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Lylyk P. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):108-15. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Erratum in: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 May;36(5):E39-40.
- Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman KM, Binning MJ, Dumont TM, Ogilvy CS, Gaughen JR Jr, Mocco J, Velat GJ, Ringer AJ, Welch BG, Horowitz MB, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1080-7; discussion 1087-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827060d9.
- McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):164-70. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2727. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
- Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):34-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2421. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
- Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, Geyik S, Cekirge HS. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;33(8):1436-46. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3246. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
- Skukalek SL, Winkler AM, Kang J, Dion JE, Cawley CM, Webb A, Dannenbaum MJ, Schuette AJ, Asbury B, Tong FC. Effect of antiplatelet therapy and platelet function testing on hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: a review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):58-65. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011145. Epub 2014 Nov 10. Review.
- Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, Chan KY, Lau SS, Lui WM, Leung KM, Lee R, Cheng HK, Cheung YL, Chan CM, Wong GK, Hui JW, Wong YC, Tan CB, Poon WL, Pang KY, Wong AK, Fung KH. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device--a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):893-901. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120422. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
- NV-PED-10
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients have been enrolled in 21 sites in EU, Australia and Israel between 24-Mar-2016 and 27-Sep-2017. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 204 |
COMPLETED | 193 |
NOT COMPLETED | 11 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Overall Participants | 204 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.8
(12.81)
|
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
≤60 years |
134
65.7%
|
> 60 years |
70
34.3%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
166
81.4%
|
Male |
38
18.6%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Greece |
21
10.3%
|
Hungary |
5
2.5%
|
Finland |
9
4.4%
|
Denmark |
3
1.5%
|
Italy |
26
12.7%
|
United Kingdom |
27
13.2%
|
Israel |
5
2.5%
|
Australia |
30
14.7%
|
France |
1
0.5%
|
Germany |
23
11.3%
|
Spain |
54
26.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Safety - Stroke/Death Occurrence |
---|---|
Description | Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurological death post-procedure (1-year) |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Measure Participants | 204 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of patients with event] |
3.23
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|---|
Comments | The primary safety objective was to determine if the 2-sided 95% upper confidence interval of the primary safety endpoint was below the threshold of 15%. Missing safety data for subjects who were lost to FU without any evidence of a major stroke/death were imputed in the analysis using multiple imputation. Subjects who withdrew from the study prior to completion and had experienced a major stroke or death were counted towards the primary safety endpoint as having experienced the event. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The primary safety objective was to determine if the 2-sided 95% upper confidence interval of the primary safety endpoint was below the threshold of 15% | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Clopper-Pearson | |
Comments |
Title | Effectiveness - Aneurysm Occlusion |
---|---|
Description | Percentage (%) of Participants who have achieved complete aneurysm occlusion (defined as Raymond-Roy grade 1) without significant parent artery stenosis (≤ 50%) or retreatment of the target aneurysm post-procedure (1-year) |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Primary effectiveness endpoint was analyzed specifically on subjects with successful device implantation (FAS population, N=200). |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Measure Participants | 200 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of patients] |
71.67
|
Title | Safety - Stroke/Death Occurrence - 30 Days |
---|---|
Description | Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurological death at 30 days post-procedure due to procedural complications |
Time Frame | 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Measure Participants | 204 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
6
2.9%
|
Title | Safety - Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) |
---|---|
Description | Percentage (%) of Participants who experienced a delayed intracerebral hemorrhage > 30 days post-procedure |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Measure Participants | 204 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
Title | Effectiveness - Deployment Rate |
---|---|
Description | Percentage (%) of Participants who have had a successful deployment of the device at the target site. A device is considered properly deployed when it covers the entire length of the aneurysm neck. |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. |
Measure Participants | 204 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
200
98%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse Events have been collected through 1 year from study procedure. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Intention to Treat (ITT) | |
Arm/Group Description | Includes all consented subjects in whom deployment of the Pipeline™ Shield device was attempted. For the ITT population, primary effectiveness endpoint analysis was based on Full Analysis Set (FAS) population and safety analysis was based on the ITT population. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Intention to Treat (ITT) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/204 (1%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Intention to Treat (ITT) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 44/204 (21.6%) | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Haemorrhagic diathesis | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Eye disorders | ||
Retinal artery occlusion | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Visual impairment | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||
Chest pain | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Pyrexia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||
Haematoma infection | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Infection | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Staphylococcal sepsis | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Wound infection | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Vascular procedure complication | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Femur fracture | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Intentional overdose | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vascular access site pseudoaneurysm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vascular pseudoaneurysm | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
Hyperkalaemia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Hyponatraemia | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Intervertebral disc protrusion | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Cerebral artery embolism | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cerebral haemorrhage | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Cerebral infarction | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Cerebral microembolism | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cerebrovascular accident | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Haemorrhagic stroke | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Intracranial mass | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Ischaemic cerebral infarction | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Ischaemic stroke | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
VIth nerve paralysis | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cerebral artery occlusion | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cerebral vasoconstriction | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cranial nerve palsies multiple | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Dysaesthesia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Haemorrhage intracranial | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Haemorrhagic transformation stroke | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Headache | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Ruptured cerebral aneurysm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||
Renal failure | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
Vaginal haemorrhage | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Laryngospasm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Pulmonary embolism | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||
Aneurysm repair | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Vascular disorders | ||
Embolism venous | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vasospasm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Intention to Treat (ITT) | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 74/204 (36.3%) | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Haemorrhagic diathesis | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Increased tendency to bruise | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Eye disorders | ||
Eye pain | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Photopsia | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Vision blurred | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Visual impairment | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Dyspepsia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Mouth haemorrhage | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Nausea | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||
Catheter site pain | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vascular stent stenosis | 16/204 (7.8%) | 16 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Contusion | 6/204 (2.9%) | 6 |
Post procedural discomfort | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Post procedural haematuria | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Procedural headache | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Vascular access site haematoma | 6/204 (2.9%) | 6 |
Vascular access site haemorrhage | 6/204 (2.9%) | 6 |
Vascular access site pseudoaneurysm | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Vascular pseudoaneurysm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Neck pain | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Amnesia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Carpal tunnel syndrome | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cerebral artery occlusion | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Cerebral infarction | 4/204 (2%) | 4 |
Dysaesthesia | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Headache | 11/204 (5.4%) | 11 |
Hypoaesthesia | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Ischaemic cerebral infarction | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Lacunar infarction | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorder | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Paraesthesia | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Polyneuropathy | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Tension headache | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Transient ischaemic attack | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Atelectasis | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Bronchospasm | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Epistaxis | 3/204 (1.5%) | 3 |
Pharyngeal haematoma | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vascular disorders | ||
Haematoma | 1/204 (0.5%) | 1 |
Vascular wall hypertrophy | 2/204 (1%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Claudia Campo |
---|---|
Organization | Medtronic Neurovascular |
Phone | 0039 0224137325 |
claudia.campo@medtronic.com |
- NV-PED-10