Effect of Ultrasound-guided Piriformis Muscle Corticosteroid Injection Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Piriformis Syndrome: a Randomized Control Trial

Sponsor
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04684537
Collaborator
(none)
70
1
2
60
1.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with ultrasound-guided piriformis coticosteroid injection in treatment of PS.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)
  • Procedure: Ultrasound-guided piriformis steroid injection
N/A

Detailed Description

Piriformis syndrome (PS) is one of the common etiology of low back pain. The cause of PS is due to myofascial syndrome of piriformis muscle, leading to piriformis muscle spasm, string-like taut band, and trigger point. Consequently, it may compresses the sciatic nerve which arise from sciatic notch and passes under the piriformis muscle. Conservative treatment of PS includes therapeutic exercise, diathermy, and local steroid injection. Among them, as radiology techniques advance, ultrasound-guided piriformis injection becomes popular for diagnosis block and treatment. Nowadays, extracorporeal shockwave therapy has widely applied in musculoskeletal disease such as plantar fasciitis, tennis elbow, and calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. However, to the investigators best knowledge, there is no study comparing the therapeutic effect between local steroid injection and shockwave. In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with ultrasound-guided piriformis corticosteroid injection.

This is a randomized controlled trial. 70 participants will be randomly divided into shockwave group and injection group. The participant in the shockwave group will receive one time extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and injection group will receive one time ultrasound-guided piriformis muscle corticosteroid injection. After the intervention, participant in both groups will receive home-based stretch exercise. Evaluation will be performed at baseline, 1 week, and 5 weeks after intervention. Outcome measures include the pain visual analog scale (VAS), hip range of motion, change of pressure pain threshold, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
70 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Piriformis Muscle Corticosteroid Injection Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Piriformis Syndrome
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Shockwave group

each subject will receive extracorporeal shockwave therapy

Procedure: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)
The therapy will be performed with the focused piezoelectric shockwave (F10G4 Richard Wolf GmbH, Germany). The patient will be kept in the hip flexion, adduction and internal rotation position. After sonography-guided localization of the affected muscle and identification of the trigger point by the participant, ultrasound gel is applied to the skin and the applicator couple is placed with an impulse energy flux density of 0.456-0.882 mJ/mm2 for 3500 impulses.

Active Comparator: Injection group

each subject will receive ultrasound-guided piriformis corticosteroid injection

Procedure: Ultrasound-guided piriformis steroid injection
all the participants will receive ultrasound-guided piriformis injection with 10 mg triamcinolone and 1 c.c. 1% lidocaine for one time.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The pain visual analog scale (VAS) [change between baseline and at 1 week, 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment.]

    It measures severity of pain. It is performed with a 100-mm horizontal line. The end of the left side is defined as no pain, and the end of the right side as the worst pain. Participants are requested to report the severity of buttock pain in recent one week.

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [change between baseline and at 1 week, 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment.]

    ODI score is used for disability evaluation. It is a self-reported questionnaire with range 0-100. It has 10 questions with an minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of 10 points, with higher scores indicating more disability. The questions include pain intensity, sleep quality, and ability to perform personal care, work, sit, walk, lift, stand, and travel.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. hip range of motion [change between baseline and at 1 week, 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment.]

    Internal and external rotation of the hip on the affected side will be measured with a goniometer by the study assistant. The measurement will be performed in the supine position according the standard procedure.

  2. change of pressure pain threshold [change between baseline and at 1 week, 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment.]

    It is defined as the amount of pressure needed to shift local sensation from pressure to pain. This is measured with a digital algometer and has been shown to have excellent intrarater reliability in the gluteal region (ICC = .90), with a minimal detectable change of 3.1 N/cm2. The digital algometer, made up of a 1-cm-wide disk, will be placed at the tender point between the ischial tuberosity and the greater trochanter while the patient is lying prone. The algometer's pressure will be increased gradually (with a speed approximately 1 N/cm2 per second) until the participant reports pain. The average value of three repeated measurements is recorded.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Patient's self evaluation [change between baseline and at 1 week, 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment.]

    At 1-week and 5-week evaluations, patients are asked to report treatment effect by themselves as the following five grades: 5. Complete relief of symptoms; 4. Much improved, no need for further treatment; 3. Mildly improved, need further treatment; 2.No improvement; 1. Worse.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age from 20 to 80

  2. Unilateral buttock involvement without leg pain or paresthesia

  3. Duration of symptoms ≥1 month

  4. Positive trigger point or taut band at piriformis muscle, confirmed by palpation and ultrasound examination

  5. Positive FAIR (flexion, adduction, internal rotation) test

  6. Positive piriformis resistive test (patient actively abducts and/or externally rotates the hip while the examiner resists these movements

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Having received hip, pelvis, or lumbar spine surgery

  2. Low back pain or buttock pain due to lumbosacral spine, hip or pelvis lesion other than piriformis syndrome

  3. Having received shock wave therapy or corticosteroid injection for buttock pain within the past one month

  4. Neurologic deficit in in the lower limbs

  5. History of drug allergy to local anesthetics or corticosteroids

  6. Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lin-Fen Hsieh, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Lin-Fen Hsieh, Principal Investigator, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04684537
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 20200715R
First Posted:
Dec 24, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Jul 12, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Lin-Fen Hsieh, Principal Investigator, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 12, 2022