AVAJAK: Apixaban/Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Thrombo-embolic Complications in JAK2V617F-positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05198960
Collaborator
(none)
1,340
37
2
60
36.2
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are frequent and chronic myeloid malignancies including Polycythemia Vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (PreMF). These MPNs are caused by the acquisition of mutations affecting activation/proliferation pathways in hematopoietic stem cells. The principal mutations are JAK2V617F, calreticulin (CALR exon 9) and MPL W515. ET or MFP/PreMF patients who do not carry one of these three mutations are declared as triple-negative (3NEG) cases even if they are real MPN cases.

These diseases are at high risk of thrombo-embolic complications and with high morbidity/mortality. This risk varies from 4 to 30% depending on MPN subtype and mutational status.

In terms of therapy, all patients with MPNs should also take daily low-dose aspirin (LDA) as first antithrombotic drug, which is particularly efficient to reduce arterial but not venous events.

Despite the association of a cytoreductive drug and LDA, thromboses still occur in 5-8% patients/year.

All these situations have been explored in biological or clinical assays. All of them could increase the bleeding risk. We should look at different ways to reduce the thrombotic incidence: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)? In the general population, in medical or surgical contexts, DOACs have demonstrated their efficiency to prevent or cure most of the venous or arterial thrombotic events.

At the present time, DOAC can be used in cancer populations according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations, except in patients with cancer at high bleeding risk (gastro-intestinal or genito-urinary cancers). Unfortunately, in trials evaluating DOAC in cancer patients, most patients have solid rather than hematologic cancers (generally less than 10% of the patients, mostly lymphoma or myeloma).

In cancer patients, DOAC are also highly efficient to reduce the incidence of thrombosis (-30 to 60%), but patients are exposed to a higher hemorrhagic risk, especially in digestive cancer patients.

In the cancer population, pathophysiology of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events may be quite different between solid cancers and MPN. If MPN patients are also considered to be cancer patients in many countries, the pathophysiology of thrombosis is quite specific (hyperviscosity, platelet abnormalities, clonality, specific cytokines…) and they are exposed to a lower risk of digestive hemorrhages. It is thus difficult to extend findings from the "general cancer population" to MPN patients.

Unfortunately, only scarce, retrospective data regarding the use of DOAC in MPNs are available data.

We were the first to publish a "real-life" study about the use, the impact, and the risks in this population. In this local retrospective study, 25 patients with MPN were treated with DOAC for a median time of 2.1 years. We observed only one thrombosis (4%) and three major hemorrhages (12%, after trauma or unprepared surgery). Furthermore, we have compared the benefit/risk balance compared to patients treated with LDA without difference.

With the increasing evidences of efficacy and tolerance of DOAC in large cohorts of patients including cancer patients, with their proven efficacy on prevention of both arterial and venous thrombotic events and because of the absence of prospective trial using these drugs in MPN patients, we propose to study their potential benefit as primary thrombotic prevention in MPN.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Direct Oral Anticoagulants
  • Drug: Low-dose aspirin
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1340 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
AVAJAK is an academic multicenter phase 3 prospective, randomized, and open label trial. > Randomization of the patients: Patients corresponding to inclusion criteria will be randomized based on a 1:1 distribution. Experimental group (Patients allocated to receive low-dose DOAC, at the choice of the investigator) Apixaban 2.5 mg BID or Rivaroxaban 10 mg OD, at the choice of the investigator. Control group (Patients allocated to receive LDA) - Aspirin 100 mg OD Dispensation of treatments every 6 months for 24 months Stratification: First stratification will be done by center Second stratification will be done by pathology (PV/ET/ PreMF) No stratification will be made based on DOAC drugs.AVAJAK is an academic multicenter phase 3 prospective, randomized, and open label trial.Randomization of the patients: Patients corresponding to inclusion criteria will be randomized based on a 1:1 distribution. Experimental group (Patients allocated to receive low-dose DOAC, at the choice of the investigator) Apixaban 2.5 mg BID or Rivaroxaban 10 mg OD, at the choice of the investigator. Control group (Patients allocated to receive LDA)Aspirin 100 mg OD Dispensation of treatments every 6 months for 24 monthsStratification:First stratification will be done by center Second stratification will be done by pathology (PV/ET/ PreMF) No stratification will be made based on DOAC drugs.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
AVAJAK: Apixaban/Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Thrombo-embolic Complications in JAK2V617F-positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group

Patients randomized to receive Direct Oral Anticoagulants, at the choice of the investigator Apixaban 2.5 mg both in day or Rivaroxaban 10 mg one per day, at the choice of the investigator

Drug: Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Patients randomized to receive DOAC, at the choice of the investigator: Apixaban 2.5 mg both in day or Rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily.

Active Comparator: Control group

Patients randomized to receive Low-Dose Aspirin Aspirin 100 mg one per day

Drug: Low-dose aspirin
Patients allocated to receive LDA: Aspirin 100 mg OD once daily.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Occurrence of arterial or venous thrombo-embolic events [24 months]

    Nb and type of thrombotic events during the FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Occurrence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleedings as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [24 months]

    Nb and type of new hemorrhagic events

  2. Occurrence of arterial thromboembolic [24 months]

    Nb and type of new arterial events

  3. Occurrence of venous thromboembolic [24 months]

    Nb and type of new venous events

  4. Occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the cytoreductive associated drugs [24 months]

    Nb and type of new thromboembolic and hemorrhage events

  5. Occurrence of serious adverse events others than thromboses and hemorrhages [24 months]

    Nb, type and grade of adverse events observed

  6. Overall survival and event-free survival [24 months]

    Time to last news and time to first event

  7. Therapeutic adherence [24 months]

    Therapeutic adherence by Girerd auto-questionnaire

  8. Occurrence of atrial fibrillation episode [24 months]

    Nb and timing of atrial fibrillation event

  9. Evaluation of Quality of life under antithrombotic drugs [24 months]

    Evaluation of QoL by the use of MPN-SAF Quality of life

  10. Evaluation of costs and incremental cost utility ratio of low-dose DOAC compared to low-dose aspirin [24 months]

    Evaluation of benefits/costs under antithrombotic drugs

  11. Evaluation of Quality of life under antithrombotic drugs [24 months]

    Evaluation of QoL by the use of EQ-5D-5L Quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with diagnosis of PV or ET or PreMF according to WHO or BSCH criteria (bone marrow biopsy not compulsory).

  • Patients with JAK2V617F mutation (threshold allele burden > 1%).

  • Patients considered as "high-risk" patients:

  1. based on age (> 60-year-old)

  2. based on thrombotic history (compatible with antithrombotic randomization) but aged ≥ 18-year-old.

  • Length of time from MPN diagnostic to inclusion will not exceed 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Contra-indication to aspirin or DOAC due to allergic situation or recent history of major bleeding.

  • Formal indication of treatment with aspirin or DOAC (thus precluding randomization).

  • Inability to give informed consent.

  • Patients under curatorship/guardianship

  • Concomitant use of a strong inhibitor or inducer of CYP3A4 (like ruxolitinib).

  • Chronic liver disease or chronic hepatitis.

  • Renal insufficiency with creatinine <30 ml/mn on Cockcroft and Gault Formula

  • Patient considered at high-risk of bleeding: patients with current or recent major or clinical relevant non major bleeding gastrointestinal or cerebral bleedings

  • Planned pregnancy within 24 months

  • No appropriate contraception (estrogen contraception or no contraception) in women of childbearing age or breastfeeding woman

  • PS>2 or life expectancy <12 months.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU d'Angers Angers France 49933
2 CH d'Annecy Annecy France 74374
3 CH d'Argenteuil Argenteuil France 95100
4 CH d'Avignon Avignon France 84000
5 CH de la Côte Basque Bayonne Bayonne France 64100
6 CHU Bordeaux Bordeaux France 33604
7 CHU Brest Brest France 29609
8 CH de Béziers Béziers France 34500
9 Hôpital privé Cesson-Sévigné Cesson-Sévigné France 35510
10 CHU de Clermont-Ferrand Clermont-Ferrand France 63003
11 Hôpital Henri Mondor (APHP) Créteil France 94010
12 CHU Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France 38043
13 CHD Vendée La Roche Sur Yon La Roche-sur-Yon France 85925
14 CH Le Mans Le Mans France 72000
15 CHU de Limoges - Hôpital Dupuytren Limoges France
16 Centre Léon Bérard Lyon Lyon France 69000
17 CHU de Montpellier Montpellier France 34295
18 CH de Morlaix Morlaix France 29600
19 CHU de Nancy Nancy France 54511
20 CHU de Nantes - Hôtel-Dieu Nantes France 44093
21 CHR d'Orléans Orléans France 45100
22 Hôpital St-Louis (APHP) Paris France 75010
23 Hôpital Cochin (APHP) Paris France 75679
24 CH de Perpignan Perpignan France 66000
25 CH de Périgueux Périgueux France 24019
26 CHIC de Quimper Quimper France 29107
27 CHU de Rennes Rennes France 35033
28 CH de Rochefort Rochefort France 17300
29 CH de Roubaix Roubaix France 59100
30 Centre Henri Becquerel de Rouen Rouen France 76038
31 Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin Saint-Cloud France 92210
32 Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth St-Priest-en-Jarez Saint-Priest-en-Jarez France 42271
33 CHU de Tours Tours France 37044
34 CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes Vannes France 56017
35 CH de Versailles Versailles France 78150
36 CH Paul-Brousse (APHP) Villejuif France 94800
37 Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste Villeurbanne Villeurbanne France 69616

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Brest

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Brest
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05198960
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 29BRC20.0263 (AVAJAK)
First Posted:
Jan 20, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 14, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Brest
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 14, 2022