Intraoperative PEEP Setting During Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery can have significant effects on the respiratory system including decreased respiratory system compliance, decreased vital capacity and functional residual capacity and atelectasis formation. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation, especially setting of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has an important role in respiratory management during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether setting of PEEP guided by measurement of pleural pressure would improve oxygenation and respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
As minimally invasive procedure with numerous advantages compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has been substantially performed worldwide. The creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery, however, can have significant effects on the respiratory system including decreased respiratory system compliance, decreased vital capacity and functional residual capacity and atelectasis formation. These pathophysiologic changes may put patients at risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Therefore, intraoperative mechanical ventilation, especially setting of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has an important role in respiratory management during laparoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on the optimal PEEP level and the best method to set PEEP during laparoscopic surgery. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, PEEP set according to pleural pressure measured by using esophageal balloon catheter significantly has beneficial effects in terms of oxygenation, compliance and possible mortality. The aim of this study is to determine whether setting of PEEP guided by measurement of pleural pressure would improve oxygenation and respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group E PEEP set according to esophageal pressure measured |
Procedure: PEEP setting based on esophageal pressure measured
PEEP is set on the basis of esophageal pressure measurement with the aim to maintain transpulmonary pressure during expiration between 0 and 5 cmH2O
|
No Intervention: Group C PEEP set at 5 cm H2O |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C [At 15 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum]
- Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C [At 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum]
- Difference in PaO2 between Group E and Group C [At 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Difference in compliance of respiratory system between Group E and Group C [At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum, and 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room]
- Difference in alveolar dead space to tidal volume ratio between Group E and Group C [At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum, and 30 minutes after arrival in recovery room]
- Difference in hemodynamics between Group E and Group C [At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum]
- Proportion of thoracoabdominal transmission of intraabdominal pressure [At 15 minutes and 60 minutes after initiation of pneumoperitoneum]
- Adverse respiratory events [During 72 hours postoperatively or until discharge from hospital]
Adverse respiratory events define as requirement of oxygen supplement after discharge from the recovery room, episodes of desaturation (SpO2 of less than 90%), now-onset respiratory infection, new infiltration on chest radiograph, or respiratory failure.
- Length of hospital stay [Up to 30 days after the operation]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with age of equal or more than 18 years old undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with anticipated surgical duration of more than 2 hours
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with ASA physical status of equal or more than 3
-
Patients with significant cardiovascular or respiratory diseases
-
Patients with significant pathological lesion in pharynx and esophagus that preclude placement of esophageal balloon catheter
-
Patients with contraindications for PEEP titration such as increased intracranial pressure or unstable hemodynamic
-
Patients with arrhythmias
-
Patients who refuse to provide written informed consent
-
Patients undergoing surgery with duration of less than 2 hours
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Siriraj Hospital | Bangkoknoi | Bangkok | Thailand | 10700 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Mahidol University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Annop Piriyapatsom, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Gallart L, Canet J. Post-operative pulmonary complications: Understanding definitions and risk assessment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;29(3):315-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 22. Review. Erratum in: Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;30(1):121-5.
- Park SJ, Kim BG, Oh AH, Han SH, Han HS, Ryu JH. Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4598-606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4797-x. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
- Pelosi P, Foti G, Cereda M, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L. Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the respiratory system. Anaesthesia. 1996 Aug;51(8):744-9.
- Rauh R, Hemmerling TM, Rist M, Jacobi KE. Influence of pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning on respiratory system compliance. J Clin Anesth. 2001 Aug;13(5):361-5.
- Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2095-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
- Valenza F, Chevallard G, Fossali T, Salice V, Pizzocri M, Gattinoni L. Management of mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;24(2):227-41. Review.
- 253/2560(EC3)