Physiotherapy in Post COVID-19 Syndrome Patients

Sponsor
Universidad de Granada (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05477199
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
1.7
23.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients who have undergone COVID-19 infection often have long-term sequelae. One of the most prevalent sequelae is pain. The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program in fear avoidance beliefs, disability, pain catastrophizing and pain interference.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program
  • Other: Control intervention
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cognitive Behavioral Principles-based Treatment Program for Patients With Post COVID-19 Syndrome
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 15, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 22, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program group

Other: Cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program
The treatment protocol had a total duration of 6 weeks. Two sessions were conducted each week, the first being a group session lasting 1.5 hours and the second an individual session lasting 45 minutes. During the group sessions, emotional disclosure and sharing of the experiences of patients with post COVID-19 syndrome were encouraged. During the individual sessions, a strong relationship was developed between the patient and the healthcare professional, with the healthcare professional helping the patient develop self-efficacy, thought monitoring, helpful self-talk, and reflection on changes in activity levels throughout the program.

Active Comparator: Control group

Other: Control intervention
Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Fear-avoidance belief changes [Baseline]

    Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).

  2. Fear-avoidance belief changes [At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention]

    Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Changes in functionality [Baseline]

    Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.

  2. Changes in functionality [At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention]

    Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.

  3. Changes in pain catastrophizing [Baseline]

    Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.

  4. Changes in pain catastrophizing [At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention]

    Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.

  5. Changes in pain interference [Baseline]

    In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.

  6. Changes in pain interference [At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention]

    In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.

  7. Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain. [Baseline]

    The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.

  8. Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain. [At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention]

    The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients of both sexes.

  • Agreed to participate.

  • Post COVID-19 patients meeting the WHO definition for this disease.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Neurological or orthopaedic pathologies that limited voluntary movement.

  • Cognitive impairment that prevented them from understanding and answering the questionnaires.

  • Patients suffering from a reinfection with SARS-CoV-2.

  • Patients who had been hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection.

  • Patients who had pre-existing chronic pain according to the current IASP definition.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada. Granada. Granada Spain 18071

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Universidad de Granada

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD, Universidad de Granada

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marie Carmen Valenza, Principal Investigator, Universidad de Granada
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05477199
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • DF0098UG
First Posted:
Jul 28, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 28, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 28, 2022