Postoperative Pain After the Use of Different Last Irrigation Method During Root Canal Treatment in Primary Teeth
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative pain levels after using EndoActivator and conventional endodontic syringe irrigation in root canal therapy of primary molars.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: EndoActivator
|
Other: Irrigation Method
Irrigation Method
|
Experimental: Conventional Endodontic Syringe
|
Other: Irrigation Method
Irrigation Method
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 8th hours [8th hours]
Pain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
- Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 24th hours [24th hours]
Pain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
- Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 48th hours [48th hours]
Pain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
- Pain level comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods:The five-face pain scale chart at 72th hours [72th hours]
Pain levels according to the five-face scale were recorded numerically as no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or very severe pain (4). All participants and their parents were informed by a blind researcher about filling out the five-face pain scale chart. To achieve standardization, pain levels were recorded by the participants under the same parent's guidance at each time interval.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 0-8 hours. [0-8 hours]
The patients were asked to choose one of the two options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep".
- Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 8-24 hours. [8-24 hours]
The patients were asked to choose one of the two options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep".
- Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 24-48 hours. [24-48 hours]
The patients were asked to choose one of the two options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep".
- Analgesic intake comparison after root canal treatment with two different irrigation methods at 48-72 hours. [48-72 hours]
The patients were asked to choose one of the two options: "0: No pain, or no pain which does not require the use of analgesics", "1: Moderate pain which can be controlled very well by the use of analgesics and does not affect daily activities or sleep".
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients exhibiting positive or definitely positive behavior on the Frankl's behavior rating scale (rating 3 or 4 on the Frankl's scale)
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 patients aged 5-9 years
-
Patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of maxillary primary molars confirmed using periapical radiographs, percussion, and cold test
-
Patients having teeth with two-thirds of each root remaining
-
Absence of periapical lesions and interradicular radiolucency
-
Moderate to very severe (2-4) five-face scale pain scores in the 24-hour period before the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who had taken analgesics and antibiotics within the last 12 hours before root canal treatment
-
Teeth with pathologic root resorption
-
Teeth with excessive mobility.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry | Kayseri | Turkey | 38039 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- TC Erciyes University
Investigators
- Study Director: Hüsniye Gümüş, PHD., Dr., Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J. 2015 Aug;41(2):78-87. doi: 10.1111/aej.12076. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
- Yılmaz K, Tüfenkçi P, Adıgüzel M. The effects of QMix and EndoActivator on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4173-4180. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02856-6. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
- 2018/152