Dual Injection ESPB Versus Single Injection ESPB for Laparotomies

Sponsor
Minia University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05633329
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
4.2
14.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of single level injection erector spinae plane block versus double level injection Erector spinae plane block in laparotomies

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: single level
  • Procedure: dual level
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Comparison Between the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Single Injection Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Dual Injection Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: Randomized Clinical Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 7, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 15, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: single ESPB

single injection at level T8

Procedure: single level
injection of 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25 at T8 (20 ml on each side)

Experimental: dual ESB

dual injection at level T7 and T9

Procedure: dual level
injection of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 at two level T7 and T9 (10 ml on each level of both side)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. first analgesic request [24 hours]

    time to request fentanyl

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. resting visual analogue pain scale [24 hours]

    pain score at rest from 0-10 which 0 mean no pain and 10 the worst pain

  2. dynamic visual analogue pain scale [24 hours]

    pain score at movement (cough) from 0-10 which 0 mean no pain and 10 the worst pain

  3. analgesic consumption [24 hours]

    total fentanyl required first day postoperative

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age18-60.

  2. Both genders.

  3. abdominal surgery.

  4. ASA I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Drug allergy.

  2. Morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2).

  3. Psychiatric disorder.

  4. Opiod dependence.

  5. patient refuse.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Minia University Minya Minia Egypt 61511

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Minia University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: hassan m. hetta, lecturer, minia university/ faculty of medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta, lecturer of anesthesia and ICU, Minia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05633329
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 474:10/2022
First Posted:
Dec 1, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Dec 9, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta, lecturer of anesthesia and ICU, Minia University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 9, 2022