PAMM: Physiological Augmentation of Mindfulness Meditation

Sponsor
Emory University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02754557
Collaborator
University of Pittsburgh (Other)
99
2
2
66.7
49.5
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of a physiologically-augmented breath-focused mindfulness-based intervention to reduce symptoms of dissociation that are associated with psychological trauma, as well as symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The study will evaluate whether physiological augmentation produces a greater change in dissociative symptoms, meditative engagement and attentional control, compared to non-augmented mindfulness. The augmentation comprises physiological feedback in the form of a vibration on the wrist. Vibrations are delivered by a device that will be placed on a participant's arm; the device vibrates in proportion to the person's breath.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Breath-Focused Meditation
  • Device: Physiological Feedback
N/A

Detailed Description

Chronically traumatized people are at much higher risk for developing dissociative symptoms, which are notoriously difficult to treat, particularly in the context of other posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Dissociation is a phenomenon that involves feelings of separation from one's body and emotional state. Mindfulness practices, including breath-focused mindfulness meditation, are known to be useful for improving attention to one's physiological state, thus enhancing a feeling of "connection" with one's present experience. However, mindfulness-based practices are naturally a challenging task for highly dissociative people. The present project proposes the use of a novel device that uses physiological feedback to boost the effects of breath-focused mindfulness meditation in this population. This device is an element placed on the wrist that vibrates in accordance with one's breath. The method capitalizes on a "bottom-up" neurophysiological process. This study plans to recruit 80 highly dissociative traumatized African American women through an established and highly productive NIH-funded project. Participants will be randomly assigned to 6 sessions of either breath-focused mindfulness meditation or physiologically augmented breath-focused mindfulness meditation. Electroencephalography data will be collected during the intervention sessions, and functional magnetic resonance imaging data will be collected pre- and post-intervention.

These methods will be used to assess whether the physiological augmentation is producing:

increased coherence or "network-like" activity among brain regions involved with interoception (awareness of one's bodily state); selective attention to the breath (increased temporo-parietal EEG gamma) and meditative engagement (increased frontal EEG theta). Clinical and neuropsychological measures will be used to assess potential effects on dissociative and posttraumatic symptoms, as well as selective and sustained attention and mindfulness ability. A follow-up will be conducted 1 month post-treatment to examine sustained clinical and cognitive effects.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
99 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Physiological Augmentation of Mindfulness Meditation
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 21, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 21, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Breath-Focused Meditation

Women with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will receive breath-focused meditation.

Other: Breath-Focused Meditation
Participants will attend two breath-focused meditation sessions per week for three weeks. During the breath focus task, participants are asked to alternatively focus their breathing (1.5 minutes of breathing and 15 seconds of rest). Participants will be asked to "attend to the changing patterns of physical sensations as the breath moves in and out of your body. Focus your awareness on any sensations you may experience (e.g., your abdominal wall rising). Follow the sensations as you breathe in and all the way through until your breath leaves your body".

Experimental: Breath-Focused Meditation + Physiological Feedback

Women with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will receive breath-focused meditation and physiological feedback.

Other: Breath-Focused Meditation
Participants will attend two breath-focused meditation sessions per week for three weeks. During the breath focus task, participants are asked to alternatively focus their breathing (1.5 minutes of breathing and 15 seconds of rest). Participants will be asked to "attend to the changing patterns of physical sensations as the breath moves in and out of your body. Focus your awareness on any sensations you may experience (e.g., your abdominal wall rising). Follow the sensations as you breathe in and all the way through until your breath leaves your body".

Device: Physiological Feedback
Participants will receive breath feedback, via dynamic velocity estimates from a respiration belt, which allows an analog of breath to be felt as vibration on their wrist via a tactile transducer on a table. The transducer is tuned to produce low frequencies so there is more vibration and less of an audible component than a regular speaker would produce.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The MDI is a 30-item self-report test of dissociative symptomology and it measures six different types of dissociative response. The scales of the MDI are disengagement, depersonalization, derealization, emotional constriction/numbing, memory disturbance, identity dissociation, and total dissociation. Items are scored from 1 to 5 where 1 = never and 5 = very often. Total scores range from 30 to 150 where higher scores indicate greater symptoms of dissociation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The CAPS is a 30-item structured interview that can be used to make current and lifetime diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as well as assess PTSD symptoms over the past week. Questions also examine the onset and duration of symptoms, subjective distress, impact of symptoms on social and occupational functioning, improvement in symptoms since a previous CAPS administration, overall response validity, overall PTSD severity, and specifications for the dissociative subtype (depersonalization and derealization). The identification of an index traumatic event to serves as the basis for symptom inquiry. The full interview takes approximately 45-60 minutes to administer. Items are scored from 0 to 4 where 0 = the symptom is absent and 4 = the symptom is incapacitating. A symptom severity score is obtained by summing items 1-20. Total scores range from 0 to 80 and a higher score indicates more severe PTSD symptoms.

  2. Change in Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview is a semistructured interview that will be used to assess for concurrent mood, substance, and psychotic disorders. The interview takes 30 minutes - 1 hour to administer. Participants answer "yes" or "no" to questions about symptoms they have been having; from these responses a clinician can diagnose lifetime and/or current presence of 22 psychiatric conditions. The number of instrument items used per interview depends on responses to previous questions and the interview is not designed to provide a numeric total score.

  3. Change in Modified PTSD Symptom Scale (MPSS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The MPSS is an 18-item instrument assessing the presence and severity of PTSD symptoms related to specific traumatic events in individuals with a known trauma history. Respondents indicate how frequently they experience each item on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 = not at all and 3 = almost always. PTSD symptomatology over the prior 2 weeks is assessed, yielding a continuous measure of PTSD symptom severity ranging from 0 to 54. A higher score indicates greater symptom severity.

  4. Change in Kentucky Mindfulness Scale Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The Kentucky Mindfulness Scale is a 39-item scale that assesses skills related to what one does while practicing mindfulness. Items are rated on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (almost always or always true). Items reflect either direct descriptions of the mindfulness skills, or they describe the absence of that skill and are reverse scored. Total scores range from 39 to 195 and higher scores reflect more mindfulness.

  5. Change in Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    This is a clinical measure that assesses various aspects of interoception, including ability to attend to body sensations, regulate distress by attending to body sensations, and experiencing body sensations as safe and trustworthy. The instrument includes 32 items and which are scored from 0 to 5, where 0 = never and 5 = always. Total scores range from 0 to 160 and higher scores indicate greater awareness of body sensations.

  6. Change in Kreek-McHugh-Schluger-Kellogg (KMSK) Marijuana/Cannabis Scale Score [Baseline and up to Week 4]

    This is a clinical measure designed to quickly assess the nature and extent of recreational use of cannabis during the last 24 hours. The instrument includes a 15-item scale where respondents indicate how much the agree with reasons for using marijuana, where 0 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. The full measure will be administered at the beginning of study participation, and one question about drug use in the past day (if applicable) will be administered on study intervention days.

  7. Change in Brain Activity as Assessed by the Rumination Task [Up to Week 4]

    The rumination task consists of alternately viewing a fixation square for 30 seconds and personally relevant negative ("ruminate") or positive ("savor") vignettes for 2 minutes about topics they typically think about while dynamically rating their mood while in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. This task will examine the extent to which different breath focus probes decrease limbic engagement and increase pre-frontal control during personally relevant negative thinking. The task will be completed in the MRI scanner during both the pre- and post-treatment sessions.

  8. Change in Affective Number Stroop (ANS) Task Score [Up to Week 4]

    During the Affective Number Stroop (ANS) Task, participants are instructed to rapidly identify the number of numbers in a given display while ignoring evocative distractor images (trauma-relevant scenes) while in a MRI scanner. In these trials, the number of numbers presented is either consistent or inconsistent with the actual number displayed, such that there are both congruent and incongruent trials. The participants will be presented with positive and neutral pictures in addition to the negative trauma-relevant images. The task will be completed in the MRI scanner during both the pre- and post-treatment sessions.

  9. Change in Penn Computerized Neuropsychological Battery Performance [Up to Week 4]

    This is a computerized neuropsychological assessment that is designed to examine different domains of cognitive functioning. The executive functioning and memory components of this battery will be administered, which take approximately 30 minutes to complete.

  10. Change in the Heartbeat Counting Task [Up to Week 4]

    In the heartbeat counting task, the researchers examine changes in accuracy and physiological reactivity during blocks of heartbeat counting that alternate with rest. Participants report the number of heartbeats they perceive feeling. This task will examine how training involving breath focus generalizes to increase interoceptive function in another domain.

  11. Change in Posttraumatic Avoidance Behaviour Questionnaire (PABQ) Score [Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The PABQ includes 25 items asking participants how often they engaged in certain behaviors in the past 3 weeks. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 1 = almost never and 4 = almost always. Total scores range from 25 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater avoidance. This questionnaire will be given at post-treatment and follow-up time points to capture participants' avoidance behaviors during this time.

  12. Change in Chesney's Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The CSES is a 26-item scale that measures one's perceived ability to cope with life's difficulties. Responses are given on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 = cannot do at all and 10 = certain can do. Total scores range from 0 to 260 where higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy with coping skills.

  13. Change in State Self Efficacy Scale Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    This is a 7 Item measure using a 7-point likert scale that will examine changes over time in self-efficacy on a state level. Responses to items range from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Total scores range from 1 to 49 where higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

  14. Change in Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    This is a 17-item scale of anhedonia that measures desire, motivation, effort and consummatory pleasure. Responses to items are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Total scores range from 0 to 68 and lower scores indicate greater anhedonia.

  15. Change in Moral Injury Events Scale for Civilians (MIES-C) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment)]

    The Moral Injury Events Scale for Civilians (MIES-C) measurement is a 10-item scale assessing for the presence of potentially morally injurious events and feelings of distress that can emerge in the aftermath of these events. Responses are given on a 6-point scale where 1 = strongly agree and 6 = strongly disagree. Total scores range from 10 to 60 and lower scores indicate more exposure to events that conflict with the respondents sense of right and wrong.

  16. Change in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    This is a 21-item self-report measure of suicidal ideation that includes items related to thoughts, attitudes and intentions related to suicide in the past week. Responses are given on a 3-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 63 and higher scores indicate greater suicidal ideation.

  17. Change in Parenting Scale (PS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The parenting scale is a 30-item self-report measure using a 7 point scale and is used to assess parental discipline practices. This PS will be administered only to participants who are currently mothers of school aged children. Responses are given on a scale from 1 to 7 and scores are typically averaged to provide a total score between 1 and 7, where higher values indicate ineffective discipline.

  18. Change in Attentional Control Scale (ACS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    This is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses attentional control a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 = almost never and 4 = always. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater difficulty with attentional control.

  19. Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The DERS is a 36 item instrument that measures emotional dysregulation symptoms. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 1 = almost never and 5 = almost always. The DERS scales include 1) nonacceptance of emotional responses, 2) difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior, 3) difficulties with impulse control, 4) limited emotional awareness, 5) limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and 6) lack of emotional clarity. Total scores range from 36 to 180 and higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation.

  20. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation-Positive (DERS-Positive) Score [Week 4 (post-treatment)]

    This is a 15-item self-report measure that assesses emotion dysregulation specifically for positive emotions. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 1 = almost never and 5 = almost always. Total scores range from 15 to 75 and higher scores suggest greater problems with regulating positive emotions.

  21. Change in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Score [Baseline up to Week 4 (post-treatment)]

    The STAI is a 40-item self-report measure that uses a 4-point Likert scale to evaluate both state and trait anxiety. Total scores range from 40 to 160 and items are scored so that a higher total score indicates greater symptoms of anxiety. This is administered at the pre-MRI and post-MRI data collection points for every MRI visit.

  22. Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment)]

    This is a 6-item self-report measure that indicates how intense one is feeling certain emotions using a 10-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater intensity of emotions.

  23. Change in Motivation and Pleasure -Self Report (MAP-SR) Score [Baseline, Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 8 (one month post-treatment)]

    The MAP-SR is an 18-item self-report measure that assesses the motivation and pleasure domain of negative symptoms. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and total scores range from 0 to 72. Certain items are reverse scored so that lower scores indicate greater pathology.

  24. Change in State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) Score [Pre-intervention and post-intervention of each session up to Week 4]

    This is a 21-item self-report measure that uses a 5-point Likert scale to assess one's perceived level of awareness and attention to the present moment and environment within a given frame of time (i.e. the last 10 minutes). This is administered before and after each intervention session. Responses are given on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very well). Total scores range from 21 to 105 and higher scores indicate greater mindfulness.

  25. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) [Week 4 (post-treatment)]

    The CSQ is an 11-item self-report measure to assess how the intervention satisfied the participant's expectations and/or if it helped their daily lives in any way. The questionnaire contains a mix of scaled responses and open ended questions and there is not a summary score for this measurement.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Experience of at least one Criterion A trauma

  • Presence of current symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that are significantly interfering with functioning

  • Multiscale Dissociation Inventory depersonalization score of 7

  • Fulfill at least two of the Clinician Administered PTSD Subscale criteria of clinically significant re-experiencing, avoidance, alterations in mood and cognitions, hyperarousal

  • Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Actively psychotic

  • Cognitively compromised

  • Pregnancy

  • Substance or Alcohol Dependence

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Grady Health System Atlanta Georgia United States 30303
2 Wesley Woods Center Atlanta Georgia United States 30329

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Emory University
  • University of Pittsburgh

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Negar Fani, PhD, Emory University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Negar Fani, Assistant Professor, Emory University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02754557
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB00085711
First Posted:
Apr 28, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by Negar Fani, Assistant Professor, Emory University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 21, 2022