A Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain

Sponsor
Endo Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00904020
Collaborator
(none)
107
11
1
9.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients with a diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), diabetic neuropathy (DN), or low back pain (LBP) who were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of Lidoderm® administered once daily (q24h) after 14 day in the treatment of PHN, DN, or LBP in patients who had a partial response to a regimen containing gabapentin.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
107 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2002
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2002

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: (1) Lidoderm

(1) Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.

Drug: Lidoderm
Patients participated in a 2-week treatment period. Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine patach 5%
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Average daily pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6) [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain quality using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    2. Investigator and Patient Global Impression of Change [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    3. Extent of numbness at the site of pain using the Numbness Questionnaire [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    4. Patient Global Assessment of Pain Relief [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    5. Safety assessments included Adverse Events (AE), discontinuation due to AEs, physical and neurological examination results, vital signs, clinical laboratory data, sensory testing, numbness testing, and dermal assessments [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    6. QoL: Pain interference (BPI Question 9) [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    7. QoL: Patient Global Assessment of Patch Satisfaction [Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin

    • Had been on a stable dose of gabapentin for at least 14 days (same dose ±10% for 14 days)

    • Had a partial response to a gabapentin-containing analgesic regimen defined as an average daily pain intensity score of >4 on a ) to 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bas as the patients have ever imagined (Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] within 24 hours prior to the screening visit

    • For diabetic patients, had a hemoglobin A1c level <0.13 (normal range, 0.047-0.064)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Had a neurological condition other than that associated with their pain diagnosis that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with their ability to participate in the study

    • Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 14 days prior to study entry

    • Had received trigger point injections within 14 days prior to study entry

    • Had received Botox injections within 3 months prior to study entry

    • Were taking a lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued while receiving Lidoderm

    • Were taking Class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., mexiletine, tocainide)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Birmingham Alabama United States
    2 Phoenix Arizona United States
    3 Plantation Florida United States
    4 Marietta Georgia United States
    5 Burr Ridge Illinois United States
    6 Overland Park Kansas United States
    7 Hackensack New Jersey United States
    8 Altoona Pennsylvania United States
    9 Cudahy Wisconsin United States
    10 Greenfield Wisconsin United States
    11 West Bend Wisconsin United States

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Study Director, Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00904020
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EN3220-008
    First Posted:
    May 19, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2010

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 15, 2010