Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators conducted a randomized, Double blind, and Controlled Study to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic pain.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
The investigators expect pain improvement after treatment with 3 mg/kg of lidocaine, continuously infused in normal saline 250 ml.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline normal saline total 250 ml once a week 4 times |
Drug: Normal saline
Normal saline continuous infusion
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Lidocaine HCl lidocaine 3 mg/kg mixed in normal saline total 250 ml once a week 4 times |
Drug: Lidocaine HCl
lidocaine continuous infusion
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- 11-point Numeric Rating Scale [1 week after the end of intervention]
Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Brief Pain Inventory Short Form [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]
measurements of pain intensity, functionality, and impact of pain, rated on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain]
- Shot Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]
15 pain descriptors ranked on a 4-stage intensity scale, the Present Pain Intensity index ranked on a 6-stage intensity and VAS (100-mm scale)
- Patient Global Impression of Change [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]
7-point scale from very much improved to very much worse
- Number of patients with grade 3 through grade 5 adverse events that are related to study drug, graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 [through the study completion (7 weeks)]
AEs, laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, finding from physical examination The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events v 4.0 on five point scale (grade 1 to 5: mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and Death)
- 11-point Numeric Rating Scale [4 weeks after the end of intervention]
Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy
-
NRS score > 4
-
stable oral medication during the 1 month trial period
-
volunteers with informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
pregnancy, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy
-
pain from causes other than upper 3 indications
-
hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics
-
important disease of heart, kidney, liver or incurable disease that may affect the assessment of adverse effects, or may interfere with the completion of study
-
severe conduction block
-
history of other interventions that may affect the study
-
Enrollment in other clinical trials within 30 days
-
otherwise not suitable to study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yong Chul Kim | Seoul | Korea, Republic of |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yong Chul Kim, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 1720150047