Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02597257
Collaborator
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea (Other)
44
1
2
11
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators conducted a randomized, Double blind, and Controlled Study to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Lidocaine HCl
  • Drug: Normal saline
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The investigators expect pain improvement after treatment with 3 mg/kg of lidocaine, continuously infused in normal saline 250 ml.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
44 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain: Randomized, Controlled, Comparative Study
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2016
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline

normal saline total 250 ml once a week 4 times

Drug: Normal saline
Normal saline continuous infusion
Other Names:
  • 228714BIJ, ISOTONIC SODIUM CHLORIDE DAEHAN PHARM. CO., LTD.
  • Active Comparator: Lidocaine HCl

    lidocaine 3 mg/kg mixed in normal saline total 250 ml once a week 4 times

    Drug: Lidocaine HCl
    lidocaine continuous infusion
    Other Names:
  • 183903BIJ, Lidocaine HCl inj. 2% DAEHAN PHARM. CO., LTD.
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. 11-point Numeric Rating Scale [1 week after the end of intervention]

      Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Brief Pain Inventory Short Form [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]

      measurements of pain intensity, functionality, and impact of pain, rated on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain]

    2. Shot Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]

      15 pain descriptors ranked on a 4-stage intensity scale, the Present Pain Intensity index ranked on a 6-stage intensity and VAS (100-mm scale)

    3. Patient Global Impression of Change [at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention]

      7-point scale from very much improved to very much worse

    4. Number of patients with grade 3 through grade 5 adverse events that are related to study drug, graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 [through the study completion (7 weeks)]

      AEs, laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, finding from physical examination The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events v 4.0 on five point scale (grade 1 to 5: mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and Death)

    5. 11-point Numeric Rating Scale [4 weeks after the end of intervention]

      Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy

    • NRS score > 4

    • stable oral medication during the 1 month trial period

    • volunteers with informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • pregnancy, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy

    • pain from causes other than upper 3 indications

    • hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics

    • important disease of heart, kidney, liver or incurable disease that may affect the assessment of adverse effects, or may interfere with the completion of study

    • severe conduction block

    • history of other interventions that may affect the study

    • Enrollment in other clinical trials within 30 days

    • otherwise not suitable to study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Yong Chul Kim Seoul Korea, Republic of

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seoul National University Hospital
    • Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Yong Chul Kim, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Yong Chul Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02597257
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1720150047
    First Posted:
    Nov 5, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 5, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Keywords provided by Yong Chul Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 5, 2015