Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sponsor
Ostfold University College (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05614609
Collaborator
(none)
120
2
10

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Few studies have compared different methods for optimalizing intubation conditions in general anesthesia. This randomized controlled trial will compare two different methods for intubation in general anesthesia in gastro- or gynecological procedures.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Lidocaine topical
N/A

Detailed Description

In general anesthesia, it is neccessary to secure the airways with an endotracheal tube. There is no international consensus on how intubation is most efficiently conducted. A cochrane review compared using muscular relaxing medication versus not using blocks for intubation. Primary outcomes were intubation conditions and discomfort in upper airways. The authors concluded that research is limited, and that further research is needed. No studies have compared local anesthetic spray on the glottis and muscular relaxing medication in intubation, focusing on discomfort in upper airways. The null-hypothesis of this study is that there is no difference in upper airway discomfort when using local anesthetic spray or muscular relaxing medication. The study will have a randomized controlled design, randomizing patients undergoing gastro- or gynecological procedures in general anesthesia to receiving either rocuronium (muscle relaxing medication) intravenous, or lidocain spray on the glottis before intubation. The primary outcome is postoperativ hoarseness two hours after intubation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Block randomization through randomization.com. Proprotion of hoarseness grade-2-or-3 = 30 % in spray and 10 % in rocuronium. 59 patients in each arm. "sig p <= ,05", H0 = 0 + 1,96*√[30(100-30)n + 10(100-10)/n] Gitt "power >= ,80" , HAlt = (30-10) - 0,84*√[30(100-30/n) + 10(100- 10/n)]Block randomization through randomization.com. Proprotion of hoarseness grade-2-or-3 = 30 % in spray and 10 % in rocuronium. 59 patients in each arm. "sig p <= ,05", H0 = 0 + 1,96√[30(100-30)n + 10(100-10)/n] Gitt "power >= ,80" , HAlt = (30-10) - 0,84√[30(100-30/n) + 10(100- 10/n)]
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Masking Description:
A study nurse will prepare sealed envelopes with the study-arm specified inside. Patients fullfilling the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. Patients will be blinded for study arm. Intubation will be performed by trained intubators. However, due to the medications possible risk for rest-curarisation, the anesthesia personnel will possibly be able to detect intervention. However, care personnel collecting data will not know which study arm the patient belongs to.
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Norwegian Hospital
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 15, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Lidocaine spray on the glottis

Lidocaine 20 mgl/ml- 4,4 ml will be sprayed on the glottis. Ventilation for 90 sek, intubation

Drug: Lidocaine topical
Comparing lidocaine spray and muscle relaxing medication
Other Names:
  • Rocurinoum 0.6 mg/kg intravenous
  • Active Comparator: Muscle relaxing medication

    Rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg administered intravenous. Ventilation for 2.5 minutes (150seconds), intubation

    Drug: Lidocaine topical
    Comparing lidocaine spray and muscle relaxing medication
    Other Names:
  • Rocurinoum 0.6 mg/kg intravenous
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Degree of hoarseness 2 hours after extubation [2 hours]

      Scored on a scale : 0=no, 1= self reported hoarseness, 2=observed hoarsness by care personnel, 3=aphonia

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Intubation conditions [Before intubation]

      Cormack & Lehane four degrees

    2. Number of intubation attempts [At intubation]

      Number

    3. Number of patients needing extra equipment for intubating [At intubation]

      bourgie, c-mac, other

    4. Proportion of patients who cough when spraying [At intubation]

      yes/no

    5. Proportion of patients with normal anatomy in upper airways [At intubation]

      yes/no

    6. Blood pressure changes during intubation [at intubation]

      Blood pressure before and 2 minutes after intubation

    7. Heart rate changes during intubation [at intubation]

      Heart rate before and 2 minutes after intubation

    8. Proportion of patients who cough on tube at extubation [At extubation]

      yes/no

    9. Proportion of patients with blood on tube after extubation [At extubation]

      yes/no

    10. Degree of hoarsness 24 and 48 hours after extubation [2-48 hours]

      Scored on a scale : 0=no, 1= self reported hoarseness, 2=observed hoarsness by care personnel, 3=aphonia

    11. Proportion of patients reporting different degrees of sore throat at 2, 24 and 48 hours after extubation [2-48 hours]

      0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate, constant pain when swallowing, 3=severe pain needing analgesia

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • ASA (American Association of Anesthesiologists Classification system for physical status) I-III

    • Understand and can express themselves in Norwegian

    • Able to give informed consent to participate

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Cave lidocain and/or muscle relaxing medication

    • BMI above 40

    • Anticipated difficult intubation

    • Need for ventricular tube

    • Pathology or malformations in upper airways

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Ostfold University College

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ann-Chatrin Leonardsen, Professor, Ostfold Hospital Trust
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05614609
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Sykehuset Østfold
    First Posted:
    Nov 14, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 20, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 20, 2023