Effect of SVV-guided Fluid Therapy on Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators conduct this randomized assessor-blinded controlled trial to evaluate the effect of SVV-guided fluid therapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality in comparison with conventional fluid therapy after major abdominal surgery. Half of participants will receive GDFT perioperatively, and the others will receive conventional fluid therapy
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Perioperative fluid management has been recognized as an important factor with an impact on postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery. However, the optimal fluid management is difficult to achieve using standard parameters (e.g., heart rate [HR], blood pressure [BP], central venous pressure[CVP], or urine output) that poorly estimate preload and preload responsiveness. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) was proposed by introducing different hemodynamic variables into a dynamic perspective of individual fluid loading with or without vasoactive substances to reach predefined goal of optimal preload and/or oxygen delivery.There have been increasing numbers of studies evaluating the effect of perioperative GDFT on postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery. However, the evidence for the beneficial effect of GDFT on postoperative recovery remains inconsistent.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: goal-directed fluid therapy Stroke Volume variation (SVV)-guided fluid therapy |
Device: the enhanced flow-based hemodynamic parameters of the FloTrac/Vigileo device
Stroke volume variation (SVV)-guided fluid therapy
|
Active Comparator: Conventional fluid therapy Conventional fluid therapy such as CVP, MAP and urine-output guided fluid therapy |
Device: the enhanced flow-based hemodynamic parameters of the FloTrac/Vigileo device
Stroke volume variation (SVV)-guided fluid therapy
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- postoperative morbidity [30 days after surgery]
number of participants with at least one complication
- GI function [30 days after surgery]
number of participants with I-FEED score >6
- length of hospital stay [30 days after surgery]
from the end of surgery to discharge from hospital
Secondary Outcome Measures
- mortality [from the end of surgery to 1 year after surgery]
death after surgery
- postoperative pain score [1 day, 3 days and 5 days after surgery]
VAS for pain :0 no pain and 10 for worst pain
- postoperative recovery quality [1 day, 3 days and 5 days after surgery]
QoR :quality of recovery score : 0 worst recovery quality and 18 for best recovery
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult patients (aged 18 to 80 years)
-
ASA I~III
-
BMI:18~30kg/m2
-
Procedures were considered major if listed for resection of gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and urologic cancer with tumor debulking, staging or reconstruction with a risk for significant surgical blood loss
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients under 18 years,
-
pregnant or lactating woman
-
patients with esophageal or gastric surgical history
-
co-existing congestive heart failure; chronic lung disease; or renal or hepatic dysfunction (creatinine >50 % or liver enzymes >50 % of normal values), and arrhythmias-operative down staging using chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy
-
patients undergoing emergency surgery
-
patients with co-existing congestive heart failure; chronic lung disease; or renal or hepatic dysfunction (creatinine >50 % or liver enzymes >50 % of normal values), and arrhythmias
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Beijing Tongren Hospital | Beijing | Beijing | China | 100730 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Beijing Tongren Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yanxia Sun, M.D., Beijing Tong Ren Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- PX2018007