Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Pain Control Trial

Sponsor
Swedish Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05906134
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
3
45.2
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-ablation plus intercostal nerve blocks, and serratus plane catheter plus intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing esophagectomies with minimally invasive thoracic approaches.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
  • Procedure: Local intercostal nerve block
  • Procedure: Cryo-analgesia and intercostal nerve block
  • Procedure: Serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks
Phase 1/Phase 2

Detailed Description

Pilot study planned to consent 30 patients in total with a projected study timeline of 2-3 years for completion. Participants will be enrolled in the study and randomized in their preoperative clinic visit. On the day of surgery, they will receive the intervention they were randomized to. 10 patients will be randomized to the intercostal block group, 10 patients will be randomized to the cryo-ablation plus intercostal block group, and 10 patients will be randomized to the serratus plane catheter plus intercostal block group. They will be followed throughout their hospital stay until discharge for data collection purposes. Once the patient is discharged from the hospital, post-operative follow-up in the Swedish Thoracic Surgery Clinic will be collected up to 1 year post-operatively.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The randomization method will be sealed opaque envelopes with computer generated numbers inside that will have been created at the start of the study. The envelopes will be kept in the Thoracic Surgery clinic by the research coordinator. At the time of randomization, the envelope will be picked from random for each patient designating which group they will be assigned to. The anesthesia team, the thoracic surgeon performing the surgery, and the thoracic surgery clinical fellows for the study will be made aware of what arm the subject is part of for preoperative planning.The randomization method will be sealed opaque envelopes with computer generated numbers inside that will have been created at the start of the study. The envelopes will be kept in the Thoracic Surgery clinic by the research coordinator. At the time of randomization, the envelope will be picked from random for each patient designating which group they will be assigned to. The anesthesia team, the thoracic surgeon performing the surgery, and the thoracic surgery clinical fellows for the study will be made aware of what arm the subject is part of for preoperative planning.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Local Intercostal Nerve Blocks, Cryo-ablation Plus Intercostal Nerve Blocks, and Serratus Plane Catheter Plus Intercostal Nerve Blocks After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 26, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: local intercostal nerve block

Patients receiving intercostal blocks will receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.

Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
The pain service and thoracic surgery attending physician will assess if the patient's pain is not well-controlled using the pain modality they are randomized to. If additional pain control is needed, this will be added as an adjunct to the study arm and will be noted in the data set. This will likely consist of a thoracic epidural catheter.

Procedure: Local intercostal nerve block
Patients receiving intercostal blocks will receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.

Active Comparator: cryo-ablation plus intercostal nerve block

Patients receiving cryo-analgesia and intercostal blocks, the patient will receive cryo-ablation prior to the intercostal block. The cryo-ablation will occur 2 cm from the sympathetic chain 2 intercostal spaces above and 2 intercostal spaces below the access incision. The patient will also receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.

Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
The pain service and thoracic surgery attending physician will assess if the patient's pain is not well-controlled using the pain modality they are randomized to. If additional pain control is needed, this will be added as an adjunct to the study arm and will be noted in the data set. This will likely consist of a thoracic epidural catheter.

Procedure: Cryo-analgesia and intercostal nerve block
The cryo-ablation will occur 2 cm from the sympathetic chain 2 intercostal spaces above and 2 intercostal spaces below the access incision. The patient will also receive a total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.
Other Names:
  • Cryo-ablation
  • Active Comparator: serratus plane catheter plus intercostal nerve block

    Patients receiving serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks, a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine will be administered. A total of 20 cc of the weight-based calculation will be reserved for the serratus plane catheter. The remaining local anesthetic will be divided into two-thirds for the chest and one-third for the abdomen. Patients with serratus plane catheters will have an ongoing infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml per hour. The serratus plane catheters will also receive a bolus of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine on Post Operative Day (POD) #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by the pain service.

    Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
    The pain service and thoracic surgery attending physician will assess if the patient's pain is not well-controlled using the pain modality they are randomized to. If additional pain control is needed, this will be added as an adjunct to the study arm and will be noted in the data set. This will likely consist of a thoracic epidural catheter.

    Procedure: Serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks
    A total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine will be administered. A total of 20 cc of the weight-based calculation will be reserved for the serratus plane catheter. The remaining local anesthetic will be divided into two-thirds for the chest and one-third for the abdomen. Patients with serratus plane catheters will have an ongoing infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml per hour. The serratus plane catheters will also receive a bolus of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine on POD #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by the pain service.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Post Operative Pain Change Over Time [Baseline (prior to OR) to every 12 hours postoperatively thru Post Operative Day 4.]

      Compare post-operative pain score changes over time between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    2. Post Operative Pain [Baseline (Prior to OR)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    3. Post Operative Pain [Post-Op Time 0]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    4. Post Operative Pain Day 1 (AM) [Post Operative Day 1 (AM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    5. Post Operative Pain Day 1 (PM) [Post Operative Day 1 (PM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    6. Post Operative Pain Day 2 (AM) [Post Operative Day 2 (AM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    7. Post Operative Pain Day 2 (PM) [Post Operative Day 2 (PM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    8. Post Operative Pain Day 3 (AM) [Post Operative Day 3 (AM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    9. Post Operative Pain Day 3 (PM) [Post Operative Day 3 (PM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    10. Post Operative Pain Day 4 (AM) [Post Operative Day 4 (AM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    11. Post Operative Pain Day 4 (PM) [Post Operative Day 4 (PM)]

      Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    All adult individuals who undergo an esophagectomy with an intended minimally invasive approach of the chest at Swedish Medical Center-First Hill. These approaches include:

    • 3-hole with R video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

    • Ivor Lewis R VATS

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Age <18

    • Unable to consent

    • Additional surgical procedures planned

    • Patients with previous thoracic surgery

    • Patient with chronic pain on a daily regimen of narcotics

    • Non-English speaking

    • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (ongoing anticoagulation, anticipated post-operative therapeutic anticoagulation, spinal cord stimulators, anatomic abnormalities preventing epidural placement)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle Washington United States 98104

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Swedish Medical Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Brian Louie, M.D., Swedish Cancer Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Swedish Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05906134
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Rib Block 21181
    First Posted:
    Jun 15, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 15, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2023
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 15, 2023